FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2802899222> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2802899222 endingPage "617" @default.
• W2802899222 startingPage "609" @default.
• W2802899222 abstract "BackgroundDespite the slow adoption of minimally invasive lobectomy (MIL), it is now a preferred approach for early lung cancer. Nevertheless, ongoing concerns about MIL oncologic effectiveness has led to calls for prospective, randomized trials.MethodsRetrospective analysis of on-line databases, collected readings, and other scholarly experiences of the experienced authors were used to construct this review. All available reports that contained long-term survival comparisons for open versus MIL were tabulated.ResultsThe preponderance of limited randomized and numerous large propensity-matched database analyses indicate equivalent or improved long-term MIL survival for early-stage disease. MIL lymph node dissection quality has been challenged; however, this was attributed to MIL avoidance of central tumors in early reports. Although technical inadequacies for MIL should be amplified for advanced cancer resections, early reports show no such concern. In fact, for special populations such as older, frail patients, evidence is much stronger that MIL confers a survival advantage.ConclusionsMIL is an oncologically equivalent operation with substantially less morbidity, especially in frail populations. It is reasonable to suggest that MIL should be the technique of choice, even a quality indicator, for lobectomy. Despite the slow adoption of minimally invasive lobectomy (MIL), it is now a preferred approach for early lung cancer. Nevertheless, ongoing concerns about MIL oncologic effectiveness has led to calls for prospective, randomized trials. Retrospective analysis of on-line databases, collected readings, and other scholarly experiences of the experienced authors were used to construct this review. All available reports that contained long-term survival comparisons for open versus MIL were tabulated. The preponderance of limited randomized and numerous large propensity-matched database analyses indicate equivalent or improved long-term MIL survival for early-stage disease. MIL lymph node dissection quality has been challenged; however, this was attributed to MIL avoidance of central tumors in early reports. Although technical inadequacies for MIL should be amplified for advanced cancer resections, early reports show no such concern. In fact, for special populations such as older, frail patients, evidence is much stronger that MIL confers a survival advantage. MIL is an oncologically equivalent operation with substantially less morbidity, especially in frail populations. It is reasonable to suggest that MIL should be the technique of choice, even a quality indicator, for lobectomy." @default.
• W2802899222 created "2018-05-17" @default.
• W2802899222 creator A5008183139 @default.
• W2802899222 creator A5056277456 @default.
• W2802899222 creator A5062024912 @default.
• W2802899222 creator A5066732415 @default.
• W2802899222 date "2018-08-01" @default.
• W2802899222 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2802899222 title "Oncologic Equivalence of Minimally Invasive Lobectomy: The Scientific and Practical Arguments" @default.
• W2802899222 cites W1515202340 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W1600591475 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W1773370762 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W1791330533 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W1970198289 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W1976598652 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W1983394428 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W1988755958 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W1990024555 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W1998370167 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W1999605433 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W1999753319 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2000348375 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2000675948 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2001835106 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2008635401 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2013333053 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2025833593 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2026912021 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2026930421 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2027786292 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2030597214 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2038294554 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2056665691 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2057604474 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2057986790 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2059110513 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2073694979 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2079468140 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2082502286 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2086857297 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2087772093 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2089180842 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2089870975 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2093704154 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2093939980 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2098949852 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2101297437 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2105696810 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2111997326 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2127857879 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2128251743 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2143575591 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2145196793 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2148456386 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2151209059 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2159399461 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2165585290 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2171673968 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2187027297 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2213858202 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2256330273 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2260989095 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2262063493 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2285650463 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2300351269 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2513192885 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2519788535 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2527109371 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2527252700 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2531702976 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2533533031 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2539475601 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2546902459 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2565540152 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2571805601 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W2585136193 @default.
• W2802899222 cites W784703211 @default.
• W2802899222 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.089" @default.
• W2802899222 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29678519" @default.
• W2802899222 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2802899222 type Work @default.
• W2802899222 sameAs 2802899222 @default.
• W2802899222 citedByCount "25" @default.
• W2802899222 countsByYear W28028992222018 @default.
• W2802899222 countsByYear W28028992222019 @default.
• W2802899222 countsByYear W28028992222020 @default.
• W2802899222 countsByYear W28028992222021 @default.
• W2802899222 countsByYear W28028992222022 @default.
• W2802899222 countsByYear W28028992222023 @default.
• W2802899222 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2802899222 hasAuthorship W2802899222A5008183139 @default.
• W2802899222 hasAuthorship W2802899222A5056277456 @default.
• W2802899222 hasAuthorship W2802899222A5062024912 @default.
• W2802899222 hasAuthorship W2802899222A5066732415 @default.
• W2802899222 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2802899222 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2802899222 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
• W2802899222 hasConcept C151730666 @default.

• next