Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2802947536> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 88 of
88
with 100 items per page.
- W2802947536 endingPage "413" @default.
- W2802947536 startingPage "407" @default.
- W2802947536 abstract "This study examined the power production differences between weightlifting derivatives through a comparison of power-time (P-t) curves. Thirteen resistance-trained males performed hang power clean (HPC), jump shrug (JS), and hang high pull (HHP) repetitions at relative loads of 30%, 45%, 65%, and 80% of their one repetition maximum (1RM) HPC. Relative peak power (PPRel), work (WRel), and P-t curves were compared. The JS produced greater PPRel than the HPC (p < 0.001, d = 2.53) and the HHP (p < 0.001, d = 2.14). In addition, the HHP PPRel was statistically greater than the HPC (p = 0.008, d = 0.80). Similarly, the JS produced greater WRel compared to the HPC (p < 0.001, d = 1.89) and HHP (p < 0.001, d = 1.42). Furthermore, HHP WRel was statistically greater than the HPC (p = 0.003, d = 0.73). The P-t profiles of each exercise were similar during the first 80-85% of the movement; however, during the final 15-20% of the movement the P-t profile of the JS was found to be greater than the HPC and HHP. The JS produced greater PPRel and WRel compared to the HPC and HHP with large effect size differences. The HHP produced greater PPRel and WRel than the HPC with moderate effect size differences. The JS and HHP produced markedly different P-t profiles in the final 15-20% of the movement compared to the HPC. Thus, these exercises may be superior methods of training to enhance PPRel. The greatest differences in PPRel between the JS and HHP and the HPC occurred at lighter loads, suggesting that loads of 30-45% 1RM HPC may provide the best training stimulus when using the JS and HHP. In contrast, loads ranging 65-80% 1RM HPC may provide an optimal stimulus for power production during the HPC." @default.
- W2802947536 created "2018-05-17" @default.
- W2802947536 creator A5001109548 @default.
- W2802947536 creator A5063973075 @default.
- W2802947536 date "2017-09-01" @default.
- W2802947536 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2802947536 title "Power-Time Curve Comparison between Weightlifting Derivatives." @default.
- W2802947536 cites W1533971941 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W1599995533 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W1973032525 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W1973823882 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W1978554981 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W1980879812 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W1992778947 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W1995300959 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W1996101753 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2022364059 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2023921022 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2031790898 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2037674758 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2059770094 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2061897444 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2065217573 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2086462169 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2086812916 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2112766429 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2114509402 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2114850647 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2130481676 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2166673993 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2170512079 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2212978976 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2258576900 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2324022334 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2523097353 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W2644667709 @default.
- W2802947536 cites W591805224 @default.
- W2802947536 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5592293" @default.
- W2802947536 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28912659" @default.
- W2802947536 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2802947536 type Work @default.
- W2802947536 sameAs 2802947536 @default.
- W2802947536 citedByCount "10" @default.
- W2802947536 countsByYear W28029475362018 @default.
- W2802947536 countsByYear W28029475362019 @default.
- W2802947536 countsByYear W28029475362021 @default.
- W2802947536 countsByYear W28029475362022 @default.
- W2802947536 countsByYear W28029475362023 @default.
- W2802947536 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2802947536 hasAuthorship W2802947536A5001109548 @default.
- W2802947536 hasAuthorship W2802947536A5063973075 @default.
- W2802947536 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2802947536 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
- W2802947536 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W2802947536 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W2802947536 hasConcept C3019424981 @default.
- W2802947536 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2802947536 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2802947536 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2802947536 hasConceptScore W2802947536C126322002 @default.
- W2802947536 hasConceptScore W2802947536C140793950 @default.
- W2802947536 hasConceptScore W2802947536C185592680 @default.
- W2802947536 hasConceptScore W2802947536C192562407 @default.
- W2802947536 hasConceptScore W2802947536C3019424981 @default.
- W2802947536 hasConceptScore W2802947536C33923547 @default.
- W2802947536 hasConceptScore W2802947536C71924100 @default.
- W2802947536 hasConceptScore W2802947536C86803240 @default.
- W2802947536 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2802947536 hasLocation W28029475361 @default.
- W2802947536 hasOpenAccess W2802947536 @default.
- W2802947536 hasPrimaryLocation W28029475361 @default.
- W2802947536 hasRelatedWork W2042127053 @default.
- W2802947536 hasRelatedWork W2187256922 @default.
- W2802947536 hasRelatedWork W2313400459 @default.
- W2802947536 hasRelatedWork W2328380595 @default.
- W2802947536 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2802947536 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2802947536 hasRelatedWork W2913765211 @default.
- W2802947536 hasRelatedWork W2979413114 @default.
- W2802947536 hasRelatedWork W3130631319 @default.
- W2802947536 hasRelatedWork W4244379845 @default.
- W2802947536 hasVolume "16" @default.
- W2802947536 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2802947536 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2802947536 magId "2802947536" @default.
- W2802947536 workType "article" @default.