Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2804241367> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2804241367 abstract "Leaf biochemical composition corresponds to traits related to the plant state and its functioning. This study puts the emphasis on the main leaf absorbers: chlorophyll a and b ([Formula: see text]), carotenoids ([Formula: see text]), water ([Formula: see text]) and dry mater ([Formula: see text]) contents. Two main approaches were used to estimate [[Formula: see text] [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]] in a non-destructive way using spectral measurements. The first one consists in building empirical relationships from experimental datasets using either the raw reflectances or their combination into vegetation indices (VI). The second one relies on the inversion of physically based models of leaf optical properties. Although the first approach is commonly used, the calibration of the empirical relationships is generally conducted over a limited dataset. Consequently, poor predictions may be observed when applying them on cases that are not represented in the training dataset, i.e. when dealing with different species, genotypes or under contrasted environmental conditions. The retrieval performances of the selected VIs were thus compared to the ones of four PROSPECT model versions based on reflectance data acquired at two phenological stages, over six wheat genotypes grown under three different nitrogen fertilizations and two sowing density modalities. Leaf reflectance was measured in the lab with a spectrophotometer equipped with an integrating sphere, the leaf being placed in front of a white Teflon background to increase the sensitivity to leaf biochemical composition. Destructive measurements of [[Formula: see text] [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]] were performed concurrently.The destructive measurements demonstrated that the carotenoid, [Formula: see text], and chlorophyll, [Formula: see text], contents were strongly correlated (r2 = 0.91). The sum of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], i.e. the total chlorophyllian pigment content, [Formula: see text], was therefore used in this study. When inverting the PROSPECT model, accounting for the brown pigment content, [Formula: see text], was necessary when leaves started to senesce. The values of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] were well estimated (r2 = 0.81 and r2 = 0.88 respectively) while the dry matter content, [Formula: see text], was poorly estimated (r2 = 0.00). Retrieval of [Formula: see text] from PROSPECT versions was only slightly biased, while substantial overestimation of [Formula: see text] was observed. The ranking between estimated values of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] from the several PROSPECT versions and that derived using the VIs were similar to the ranking observed over the destructively measured values of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text].PROSPECT model inversion and empirical VI approach provide similar retrieval performances and are useful methods to estimate leaf biochemical composition from spectral measurements. However, the PROSPECT model inversion gives potential access to additional traits on surface reflectivity and leaf internal structure. This study suggests that non-destructive estimation of leaf chlorophyll and water contents is a relevant method to provide leaf traits with relatively high throughput." @default.
- W2804241367 created "2018-06-01" @default.
- W2804241367 creator A5007289023 @default.
- W2804241367 creator A5011582896 @default.
- W2804241367 creator A5041664995 @default.
- W2804241367 creator A5045314681 @default.
- W2804241367 creator A5060038338 @default.
- W2804241367 creator A5091763450 @default.
- W2804241367 date "2018-03-20" @default.
- W2804241367 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2804241367 title "Estimation of leaf traits from reflectance measurements: comparison between methods based on vegetation indices and several versions of the PROSPECT model" @default.
- W2804241367 cites W1533738650 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W178779460 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W188908432 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W1944729816 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W1965283081 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W1966281492 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W1974110440 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W1975324425 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W1976049210 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W1978692093 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W1980023994 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W1987622292 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W1988233512 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W1997131471 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W1999512103 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2009059928 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2009172243 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2013328968 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2013527928 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2015320045 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2015799298 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2028428309 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2028766141 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2031699093 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2035524116 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2038412351 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2041684917 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2043035644 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2043040083 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2046514208 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2049398443 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2051128904 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2058923136 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2059354705 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2065191898 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2066612219 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2067140368 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2071504269 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2086314176 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2086330580 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2100223768 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2103184761 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2109006150 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2111584934 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2116772317 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2118791227 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2121025745 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2121102297 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2124937378 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2125045489 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2125230412 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2129719999 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2151088241 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2151968140 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2158755893 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2159961845 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2163701694 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2165157871 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2212839633 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2261659740 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2418464274 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2577355655 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2596051487 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2616754845 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W2626613115 @default.
- W2804241367 cites W4253980303 @default.
- W2804241367 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-018-0291-x" @default.
- W2804241367 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5861673" @default.
- W2804241367 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29581726" @default.
- W2804241367 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2804241367 type Work @default.
- W2804241367 sameAs 2804241367 @default.
- W2804241367 citedByCount "35" @default.
- W2804241367 countsByYear W28042413672018 @default.
- W2804241367 countsByYear W28042413672019 @default.
- W2804241367 countsByYear W28042413672020 @default.
- W2804241367 countsByYear W28042413672021 @default.
- W2804241367 countsByYear W28042413672022 @default.
- W2804241367 countsByYear W28042413672023 @default.
- W2804241367 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2804241367 hasAuthorship W2804241367A5007289023 @default.
- W2804241367 hasAuthorship W2804241367A5011582896 @default.
- W2804241367 hasAuthorship W2804241367A5041664995 @default.
- W2804241367 hasAuthorship W2804241367A5045314681 @default.
- W2804241367 hasAuthorship W2804241367A5060038338 @default.
- W2804241367 hasAuthorship W2804241367A5091763450 @default.
- W2804241367 hasBestOaLocation W28042413671 @default.
- W2804241367 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2804241367 hasConcept C108597893 @default.