FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2804894927> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2804894927 endingPage "2040" @default.
• W2804894927 startingPage "2032" @default.
• W2804894927 abstract "To analyze graft and fixation (screw and EndoButton) positioning after the arthroscopic Latarjet technique with 2-dimensional computed tomography (CT) and to compare it with the open technique.We performed a retrospective multicenter study (March 2013 to June 2014). The inclusion criteria included patients with recurrent anterior instability treated with the Latarjet procedure. The exclusion criterion was the absence of a postoperative CT scan. The positions of the hardware, the positions of the grafts in the axial and sagittal planes, and the dispersion of values (variability) were compared.The study included 208 patients (79 treated with open technique, 87 treated with arthroscopic Latarjet technique with screw fixation [arthro-screw], and 42 treated with arthroscopic Latarjet technique with EndoButton fixation [arthro-EndoButton]). The angulation of the screws was different in the open group versus the arthro-screw group (superior, 10.3° ± 0.7° vs 16.9° ± 1.0° [P < .001]; inferior, 10.3° ± 0.8° vs 15.7° ± 0.9° [P < .0001]). The angulation of the EndoButtons was 5.7° ± 0.5°; this was different from that of open inferior screws (P = .003). In the axial plane (level of equator), the arthroscopic techniques resulted in lateral positions (arthro-screw, 1.5 ± 0.3 mm lateral [P < .001]; arthro-EndoButton, 0 ± 0.3 mm lateral [P < .0001]) versus the open technique (0.9 ± 0.2 mm medial). At the level of 25% of the glenoid height, the arthroscopic techniques resulted in lateral positions (arthro-screw, 0.3 ± 0.3 mm lateral [P < .001]); (arthro-EndoButton, 0.7 ± 0.3 mm lateral [P < .0001]) versus the open technique (1.0 ± 0.2 mm medial). Higher variability was observed in the arthro-screw group. In the sagittal plane, the arthro-screw technique resulted in higher positions (55% ± 3% of graft below equator) and the arthro-EndoButton technique resulted in lower positions (82% ± 3%, P < .0001) versus the open technique (71% ± 2%). Variability was not different.This study shows that the position of the fixation devices and position of the bone graft with the arthroscopic techniques are statistically significantly different from those with the open technique with 2-dimensional CT assessment. In the sagittal plane, the arthro-screw technique provides the highest positions, and the arthro-EndoButton technique, the lowest. Overall, the mean position of the bone block with the open Latarjet technique in the axial plane is slightly medial to the joint line, as recommended. Conversely, with the arthroscopic techniques, the bone grafts are more lateral with a slight overhang. The main differences are observed in the dispersion of the values (more extreme positions) with the arthro-screw technique, given the acknowledged limitations. Despite the statistical significance, the clinical significance of these differences is yet unknown.Level III, retrospective comparative study." @default.
• W2804894927 created "2018-06-01" @default.
• W2804894927 creator A5011016293 @default.
• W2804894927 creator A5011861738 @default.
• W2804894927 creator A5026433626 @default.
• W2804894927 creator A5037712172 @default.
• W2804894927 creator A5038952993 @default.
• W2804894927 creator A5050092854 @default.
• W2804894927 creator A5073764524 @default.
• W2804894927 date "2018-07-01" @default.
• W2804894927 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2804894927 title "Arthroscopic Latarjet Techniques: Graft and Fixation Positioning Assessed With 2-Dimensional Computed Tomography Is Not Equivalent With Standard Open Technique" @default.
• W2804894927 cites W1186606699 @default.
• W2804894927 cites W1431027972 @default.
• W2804894927 cites W1978367590 @default.
• W2804894927 cites W1990058452 @default.
• W2804894927 cites W2012550236 @default.
• W2804894927 cites W2056972351 @default.
• W2804894927 cites W2078332935 @default.
• W2804894927 cites W2080979790 @default.
• W2804894927 cites W2083352175 @default.
• W2804894927 cites W2104102338 @default.
• W2804894927 cites W2117498332 @default.
• W2804894927 cites W2197981504 @default.
• W2804894927 cites W2519144399 @default.
• W2804894927 cites W2529030464 @default.
• W2804894927 cites W2597510702 @default.
• W2804894927 cites W2603389142 @default.
• W2804894927 cites W2739514331 @default.
• W2804894927 cites W2766979074 @default.
• W2804894927 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.054" @default.
• W2804894927 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29789246" @default.
• W2804894927 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2804894927 type Work @default.
• W2804894927 sameAs 2804894927 @default.
• W2804894927 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W2804894927 countsByYear W28048949272018 @default.
• W2804894927 countsByYear W28048949272019 @default.
• W2804894927 countsByYear W28048949272020 @default.
• W2804894927 countsByYear W28048949272021 @default.
• W2804894927 countsByYear W28048949272022 @default.
• W2804894927 countsByYear W28048949272023 @default.
• W2804894927 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2804894927 hasAuthorship W2804894927A5011016293 @default.
• W2804894927 hasAuthorship W2804894927A5011861738 @default.
• W2804894927 hasAuthorship W2804894927A5026433626 @default.
• W2804894927 hasAuthorship W2804894927A5037712172 @default.
• W2804894927 hasAuthorship W2804894927A5038952993 @default.
• W2804894927 hasAuthorship W2804894927A5050092854 @default.
• W2804894927 hasAuthorship W2804894927A5073764524 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConcept C178910020 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConcept C2777307732 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConcept C2778436160 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConceptScore W2804894927C105702510 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConceptScore W2804894927C141071460 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConceptScore W2804894927C146249460 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConceptScore W2804894927C178910020 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConceptScore W2804894927C2777307732 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConceptScore W2804894927C2778436160 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConceptScore W2804894927C2779162959 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConceptScore W2804894927C2908647359 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConceptScore W2804894927C29694066 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConceptScore W2804894927C2989005 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConceptScore W2804894927C544519230 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConceptScore W2804894927C71924100 @default.
• W2804894927 hasConceptScore W2804894927C99454951 @default.
• W2804894927 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2804894927 hasLocation W28048949271 @default.
• W2804894927 hasLocation W28048949272 @default.
• W2804894927 hasOpenAccess W2804894927 @default.
• W2804894927 hasPrimaryLocation W28048949271 @default.
• W2804894927 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2804894927 hasRelatedWork W2006886392 @default.
• W2804894927 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2804894927 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2804894927 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W2804894927 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W2804894927 hasRelatedWork W2416622510 @default.
• W2804894927 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2804894927 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W2804894927 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2804894927 hasVolume "34" @default.
• W2804894927 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2804894927 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2804894927 magId "2804894927" @default.
• W2804894927 workType "article" @default.