FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2805116498> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2805116498 endingPage "211" @default.
• W2805116498 startingPage "201" @default.
• W2805116498 abstract "BACKGROUND The use of wearable accelerometers in conjunction with Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) may provide additional useful information about maximum performance in workers and enhance the validity of functional testing. However, little research has been conducted to compare accelerometer output with performance during FCE. OBJECTIVE The objectives of this study were to: (1) Determine the magnitude and direction of correlation between participant performance on five FCE tasks and scores from Actigraph activity monitors; and (2) Compare the results of two different placements of Actigraph devices. METHOD We used a cross-sectional design and convenience sampling to collect data from 46 healthy participants. Each participant completed 5 functional tasks selected from the WorkWell FCE protocol while wearing 2 Actigraph devices, 1 on the dominant side waist and 1 on the non-dominant wrist. The FCE tasks included 5-repetition maximum lifting (floor-to-waist, waist to crown and front carry), a sustained overhead work endurance task, and the 6-minute walk test. Analysis included calculating Pearson regression coefficients between maximum FCE item performance and Actigraph vector magnitudes (VM) along with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) to compare VM activity counts derived from the Actigraphs on the waist and wrist. RESULTS Thirty-Nine (84.8%) participants had complete data and were included in analysis. Findings indicate Actigraph VM data from the device worn on the waist correlated positively with maximum lift performance (r = 0.39-0.64, p < 0.001 to 0.08) and 6-minute walk distance (r = 0.66, p < 0.001). Actigraph data from wrist placement were not significantly correlated with FCE performance on any of the functional tasks, except when comparing average VM data and waist to crown lift (r = 0.44, p < 0.001). There was no significant correlation in either Actigraph placement for VM and overhead work time. ICCs between the two Actigraph placements ranged from poor to acceptable agreement (ICC = 0.24-0.70, p < 0.001 to 0.19). CONCLUSIONS Actigraph device output correlated moderately with maximum performance on FCE lift and ambulation tests. Waist placement appears more suitable than wrist during performance-based tests." @default.
• W2805116498 created "2018-06-13" @default.
• W2805116498 creator A5023132409 @default.
• W2805116498 creator A5024875364 @default.
• W2805116498 creator A5025572518 @default.
• W2805116498 creator A5057188917 @default.
• W2805116498 date "2020-06-04" @default.
• W2805116498 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2805116498 title "Do wearable fitness devices correlate with performance-based tests of work-related functional capacity?" @default.
• W2805116498 cites W135005531 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W1826417490 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W1995252122 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W1995946538 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W2001223706 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W2002566365 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W2017282728 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W2034757894 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W2035855116 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W2056045481 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W2065983469 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W2079954077 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W2086199715 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W2088945744 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W2095561638 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W2117289625 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W2129732698 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W2148048965 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W2152991169 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W2163319330 @default.
• W2805116498 cites W2329483624 @default.
• W2805116498 doi "https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-203164" @default.
• W2805116498 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32417827" @default.
• W2805116498 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2805116498 type Work @default.
• W2805116498 sameAs 2805116498 @default.
• W2805116498 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2805116498 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2805116498 hasAuthorship W2805116498A5023132409 @default.
• W2805116498 hasAuthorship W2805116498A5024875364 @default.
• W2805116498 hasAuthorship W2805116498A5025572518 @default.
• W2805116498 hasAuthorship W2805116498A5057188917 @default.
• W2805116498 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2805116498 hasConcept C149635348 @default.
• W2805116498 hasConcept C150594956 @default.
• W2805116498 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W2805116498 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2805116498 hasConcept C54290928 @default.
• W2805116498 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2805116498 hasConceptScore W2805116498C127413603 @default.
• W2805116498 hasConceptScore W2805116498C149635348 @default.
• W2805116498 hasConceptScore W2805116498C150594956 @default.
• W2805116498 hasConceptScore W2805116498C18762648 @default.
• W2805116498 hasConceptScore W2805116498C41008148 @default.
• W2805116498 hasConceptScore W2805116498C54290928 @default.
• W2805116498 hasConceptScore W2805116498C78519656 @default.
• W2805116498 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2805116498 hasLocation W28051164981 @default.
• W2805116498 hasOpenAccess W2805116498 @default.
• W2805116498 hasPrimaryLocation W28051164981 @default.
• W2805116498 hasRelatedWork W2095299560 @default.
• W2805116498 hasRelatedWork W2907667791 @default.
• W2805116498 hasRelatedWork W2943851981 @default.
• W2805116498 hasRelatedWork W2999645641 @default.
• W2805116498 hasRelatedWork W3083225868 @default.
• W2805116498 hasRelatedWork W3090300519 @default.
• W2805116498 hasRelatedWork W3091457675 @default.
• W2805116498 hasRelatedWork W3126390843 @default.
• W2805116498 hasRelatedWork W4250401876 @default.
• W2805116498 hasRelatedWork W4312415459 @default.
• W2805116498 hasVolume "66" @default.
• W2805116498 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2805116498 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2805116498 magId "2805116498" @default.
• W2805116498 workType "article" @default.