FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2805278344> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2805278344 endingPage "2624" @default.
• W2805278344 startingPage "2618" @default.
• W2805278344 abstract "Purpose Inferior maxillary repositioning is among the least stable and least predictable orthognathic procedures. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether posterior movement occurred with inferior maxillary repositioning and to analyze potential causes. Materials and Methods This retrospective observational study evaluated all consecutive patients treated at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Odense University Hospital (Odense, Denmark) with inferior maxillary repositioning from 2011 to 2013. The obtained repositioning was compared with the virtual surgical plan to determine surgical accuracy. Measurements were performed at 3 dental reference points. Linear and rotational measurements were performed along and around the right, anterior, and superior axes. Measurements were compared by paired t tests. Internal correlations and confounding variables were analyzed by mixed model regression analysis. Results Twenty patients were included for analysis. On average, the maxilla was positioned 1 mm posterior and 0.4 mm superior to the planned position. The virtual surgically planned reposition was statistically correlated with surgical accuracy. No other confounding variable influenced the outcome. Conclusion The correlation between planned advancement and inferior repositioning suggests that inferior repositioning destabilizes the maxillary position and that a perioperative or early postoperative relapse occurs in response to the advancement. This immediate relapse of 1 mm should be considered in the virtual surgical plan to ensure that the maxilla is placed closer to the desired position. Thus, this procedure could still benefit from increased surgical precision and stability based on technologic advancements, such as positioning guides or printed patient-specific plates. Inferior maxillary repositioning is among the least stable and least predictable orthognathic procedures. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether posterior movement occurred with inferior maxillary repositioning and to analyze potential causes. This retrospective observational study evaluated all consecutive patients treated at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Odense University Hospital (Odense, Denmark) with inferior maxillary repositioning from 2011 to 2013. The obtained repositioning was compared with the virtual surgical plan to determine surgical accuracy. Measurements were performed at 3 dental reference points. Linear and rotational measurements were performed along and around the right, anterior, and superior axes. Measurements were compared by paired t tests. Internal correlations and confounding variables were analyzed by mixed model regression analysis. Twenty patients were included for analysis. On average, the maxilla was positioned 1 mm posterior and 0.4 mm superior to the planned position. The virtual surgically planned reposition was statistically correlated with surgical accuracy. No other confounding variable influenced the outcome. The correlation between planned advancement and inferior repositioning suggests that inferior repositioning destabilizes the maxillary position and that a perioperative or early postoperative relapse occurs in response to the advancement. This immediate relapse of 1 mm should be considered in the virtual surgical plan to ensure that the maxilla is placed closer to the desired position. Thus, this procedure could still benefit from increased surgical precision and stability based on technologic advancements, such as positioning guides or printed patient-specific plates." @default.
• W2805278344 created "2018-06-13" @default.
• W2805278344 creator A5025345926 @default.
• W2805278344 creator A5048904244 @default.
• W2805278344 date "2018-12-01" @default.
• W2805278344 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2805278344 title "Surgical Accuracy in Inferior Maxillary Reposition" @default.
• W2805278344 cites W1112567059 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W1965514940 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W1969240388 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W1974293430 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W1982424300 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W1982498141 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W1982757568 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W1996263605 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W2038396198 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W2068669621 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W2075531707 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W2086154430 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W2090156200 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W2095045911 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W2113974505 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W2127013551 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W2132547768 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W2132832652 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W2168813698 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W2345745222 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W2749933658 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W2761066287 @default.
• W2805278344 cites W2769647206 @default.
• W2805278344 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.05.022" @default.
• W2805278344 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29935179" @default.
• W2805278344 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2805278344 type Work @default.
• W2805278344 sameAs 2805278344 @default.
• W2805278344 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2805278344 countsByYear W28052783442018 @default.
• W2805278344 countsByYear W28052783442019 @default.
• W2805278344 countsByYear W28052783442020 @default.
• W2805278344 countsByYear W28052783442021 @default.
• W2805278344 countsByYear W28052783442022 @default.
• W2805278344 countsByYear W28052783442023 @default.
• W2805278344 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2805278344 hasAuthorship W2805278344A5025345926 @default.
• W2805278344 hasAuthorship W2805278344A5048904244 @default.
• W2805278344 hasConcept C122246415 @default.
• W2805278344 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2805278344 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2805278344 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2805278344 hasConcept C2776347944 @default.
• W2805278344 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2805278344 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W2805278344 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2805278344 hasConcept C77350462 @default.
• W2805278344 hasConceptScore W2805278344C122246415 @default.
• W2805278344 hasConceptScore W2805278344C141071460 @default.
• W2805278344 hasConceptScore W2805278344C142724271 @default.
• W2805278344 hasConceptScore W2805278344C199343813 @default.
• W2805278344 hasConceptScore W2805278344C2776347944 @default.
• W2805278344 hasConceptScore W2805278344C29694066 @default.
• W2805278344 hasConceptScore W2805278344C31174226 @default.
• W2805278344 hasConceptScore W2805278344C71924100 @default.
• W2805278344 hasConceptScore W2805278344C77350462 @default.
• W2805278344 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W2805278344 hasLocation W28052783441 @default.
• W2805278344 hasLocation W28052783442 @default.
• W2805278344 hasOpenAccess W2805278344 @default.
• W2805278344 hasPrimaryLocation W28052783441 @default.
• W2805278344 hasRelatedWork W2057056929 @default.
• W2805278344 hasRelatedWork W2375548108 @default.
• W2805278344 hasRelatedWork W2392978342 @default.
• W2805278344 hasRelatedWork W2409781227 @default.
• W2805278344 hasRelatedWork W2592053735 @default.
• W2805278344 hasRelatedWork W2594627854 @default.
• W2805278344 hasRelatedWork W2946218042 @default.
• W2805278344 hasRelatedWork W3123198999 @default.
• W2805278344 hasRelatedWork W3130690034 @default.
• W2805278344 hasRelatedWork W4220781051 @default.
• W2805278344 hasVolume "76" @default.
• W2805278344 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2805278344 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2805278344 magId "2805278344" @default.
• W2805278344 workType "article" @default.