FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2806263170> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2806263170 endingPage "27" @default.
• W2806263170 startingPage "20" @default.
• W2806263170 abstract "In Brief OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of salpingectomy compared with standard bilateral tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery in women with undesired fertility. METHODS: We included women at 35 weeks of gestation or greater desiring permanent sterilization at the time of cesarean delivery. Patients were randomized after skin incision to bilateral salpingectomy or bilateral tubal ligation by a computer-generated scheme. If salpingectomy could not be completed on one or both sides, bilateral tubal ligation was attempted. Primary feasibility outcomes were total operative time and bilateral completion of the randomized procedure. Secondary outcomes included clinically estimated blood loss and surgical complications up to 6 weeks postpartum. We estimated that 80 patients (40 per group) would provide greater than 80% power to identify a 10-minute difference in the primary outcome (time) with a SD of 15 minutes and a two-sided α of 0.05. Analysis was by intent to treat. RESULTS: Of 221 women screened from June 2015 to April 2017, 115 (52%) consented to the study; 80 were randomized—40 to salpingectomy and 40 to bilateral tubal ligation. Groups were similar at baseline. A total of 27 bilateral salpingectomies were successfully completed compared with 38 bilateral tubal ligations (68% compared with 95%, P=.002). Total operative time was on average 15 minutes longer for salpingectomies (75.4±29.1 compared with 60.0±23.3 minutes, P=.004). No adverse outcomes directly related to the sterilization procedure were noted in either group. Although estimated blood loss of only the sterilization procedure (surgeon estimate) was greater for the salpingectomy group (median 10 [interquartile range 5–25] compared with 5 [interquartile range 5–10] cc, P<.001), total estimated blood loss and safety outcomes were similar for both groups. CONCLUSION: Adding 15 minutes to total operative times, salpingectomy can be successfully completed in approximately two thirds of women desiring permanent contraception with cesarean delivery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02374827. Complete salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery adds an additional 15 minutes to operative times and is feasible in approximately two thirds of women." @default.
• W2806263170 created "2018-06-13" @default.
• W2806263170 creator A5004502545 @default.
• W2806263170 creator A5006402876 @default.
• W2806263170 creator A5010910235 @default.
• W2806263170 creator A5018998777 @default.
• W2806263170 creator A5040565358 @default.
• W2806263170 creator A5069544141 @default.
• W2806263170 creator A5076400654 @default.
• W2806263170 date "2018-07-01" @default.
• W2806263170 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2806263170 title "Feasibility of Complete Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Postpartum Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery" @default.
• W2806263170 cites W1523215342 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W1982855497 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W1984325076 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W1991762059 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W2030076350 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W2033070867 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W2056739417 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W2070369494 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W2095085832 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W2104600384 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W2106247280 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W2132828003 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W2149834266 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W2394929452 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W2469743348 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W2520704285 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W2547328490 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W2594150790 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W2607545526 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W2620679600 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W2751498084 @default.
• W2806263170 cites W4237170096 @default.
• W2806263170 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002646" @default.
• W2806263170 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6019146" @default.
• W2806263170 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29889762" @default.
• W2806263170 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2806263170 type Work @default.
• W2806263170 sameAs 2806263170 @default.
• W2806263170 citedByCount "40" @default.
• W2806263170 countsByYear W28062631702018 @default.
• W2806263170 countsByYear W28062631702019 @default.
• W2806263170 countsByYear W28062631702020 @default.
• W2806263170 countsByYear W28062631702021 @default.
• W2806263170 countsByYear W28062631702022 @default.
• W2806263170 countsByYear W28062631702023 @default.
• W2806263170 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2806263170 hasAuthorship W2806263170A5004502545 @default.
• W2806263170 hasAuthorship W2806263170A5006402876 @default.
• W2806263170 hasAuthorship W2806263170A5010910235 @default.
• W2806263170 hasAuthorship W2806263170A5018998777 @default.
• W2806263170 hasAuthorship W2806263170A5040565358 @default.
• W2806263170 hasAuthorship W2806263170A5069544141 @default.
• W2806263170 hasAuthorship W2806263170A5076400654 @default.
• W2806263170 hasBestOaLocation W28062631702 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C148761745 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C179437574 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C204243189 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C2776018949 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C2779065011 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C2779076696 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C2780164438 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C2983132609 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C2986817661 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C2991743468 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C3020128735 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C46973012 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C536366893 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C556758197 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConceptScore W2806263170C131872663 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConceptScore W2806263170C141071460 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConceptScore W2806263170C148761745 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConceptScore W2806263170C162324750 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConceptScore W2806263170C168563851 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConceptScore W2806263170C179437574 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConceptScore W2806263170C204243189 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConceptScore W2806263170C2776018949 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConceptScore W2806263170C2779065011 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConceptScore W2806263170C2779076696 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConceptScore W2806263170C2779234561 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConceptScore W2806263170C2780164438 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConceptScore W2806263170C2908647359 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConceptScore W2806263170C2983132609 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConceptScore W2806263170C2986817661 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConceptScore W2806263170C2991743468 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConceptScore W2806263170C3020128735 @default.
• W2806263170 hasConceptScore W2806263170C46973012 @default.

• next