FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2806622182> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2806622182 endingPage "1160" @default.
• W2806622182 startingPage "1152" @default.
• W2806622182 abstract "The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) uses a unique approach to Merit Review that includes patients and stakeholders as reviewers with scientists, and includes unique review criteria (patient-centeredness and active engagement of end users in the research). This study assessed the extent to which different reviewer types influence review scores and funding outcomes, the emphasis placed on technical merit compared to other criteria by a multistakeholder panel, and the impact of the in-person discussion on agreement among different reviewer types.Cross-sectional analysis of administrative data from PCORI online and in-person Merit Review (N = 1312 applications from the five funding cycles from November 2013 to August 2015). Linear and logistic regression models were used to analyze the data.For all reviewer types, final review scores were associated with at least one review criterion score from each of the three reviewer types. The strongest predictor of final overall scores for all reviewer types was scientists' prediscussion ratings of technical merit. All reviewers' prediscussion ratings of the potential to improve health care and outcomes, and scientists' ratings of technical merit and patient-centeredness, were associated with funding success. For each reviewer type, overall impact scores from the online scoring were changed on at least half of the applications at the in-person panel discussion. Score agreement across reviewer types was greater after panel discussion.Scientist, patient, and stakeholder views all contribute to PCORI Merit Review of applications for research funding. Technical merit is critical to funding success but patient and stakeholder ratings of other criteria also influence application disposition." @default.
• W2806622182 created "2018-06-13" @default.
• W2806622182 creator A5010530964 @default.
• W2806622182 creator A5013638977 @default.
• W2806622182 creator A5024406367 @default.
• W2806622182 creator A5044448287 @default.
• W2806622182 creator A5054057100 @default.
• W2806622182 creator A5057283825 @default.
• W2806622182 creator A5060127358 @default.
• W2806622182 creator A5081811061 @default.
• W2806622182 date "2018-10-01" @default.
• W2806622182 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2806622182 title "Unique Review Criteria and Patient and Stakeholder Reviewers: Analysis of PCORI’s Approach to Research Funding" @default.
• W2806622182 cites W1498664051 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W1562444029 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W1659029522 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W1968271334 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W1975626251 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2002502156 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2015795623 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2019882009 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2023624428 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2029908886 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2032388524 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2043093666 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2049400161 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2049517506 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2055055087 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2057029201 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2059796825 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2069079727 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2084341220 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2092309740 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2127367027 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2129508295 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2156331812 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2157746101 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2162273749 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2164434252 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2177836738 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2413221400 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W2807949595 @default.
• W2806622182 cites W594356415 @default.
• W2806622182 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2018.03.017" @default.
• W2806622182 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30314615" @default.
• W2806622182 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2806622182 type Work @default.
• W2806622182 sameAs 2806622182 @default.
• W2806622182 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2806622182 countsByYear W28066221822018 @default.
• W2806622182 countsByYear W28066221822019 @default.
• W2806622182 countsByYear W28066221822020 @default.
• W2806622182 countsByYear W28066221822021 @default.
• W2806622182 countsByYear W28066221822022 @default.
• W2806622182 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2806622182 hasAuthorship W2806622182A5010530964 @default.
• W2806622182 hasAuthorship W2806622182A5013638977 @default.
• W2806622182 hasAuthorship W2806622182A5024406367 @default.
• W2806622182 hasAuthorship W2806622182A5044448287 @default.
• W2806622182 hasAuthorship W2806622182A5054057100 @default.
• W2806622182 hasAuthorship W2806622182A5057283825 @default.
• W2806622182 hasAuthorship W2806622182A5060127358 @default.
• W2806622182 hasAuthorship W2806622182A5081811061 @default.
• W2806622182 hasBestOaLocation W28066221821 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConcept C201305675 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConcept C2776814669 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConcept C2778111679 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConcept C2780454255 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConceptScore W2806622182C142724271 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConceptScore W2806622182C15744967 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConceptScore W2806622182C159110408 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConceptScore W2806622182C160735492 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConceptScore W2806622182C17744445 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConceptScore W2806622182C199539241 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConceptScore W2806622182C201305675 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConceptScore W2806622182C204787440 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConceptScore W2806622182C2776814669 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConceptScore W2806622182C2778111679 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConceptScore W2806622182C2779473830 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConceptScore W2806622182C2780454255 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConceptScore W2806622182C39549134 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConceptScore W2806622182C509550671 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConceptScore W2806622182C512399662 @default.
• W2806622182 hasConceptScore W2806622182C71924100 @default.
• W2806622182 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2806622182 hasLocation W28066221821 @default.

• next