FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2806644997> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2806644997 abstract "Journal clubs (JC) may increase clinicians' evidence-based practice (EBP) skills and facilitate evidence uptake in clinical practice, however there is a lack of research into their effectiveness in allied health. We investigated the effectiveness of a structured JC that is Tailored According to Research Evidence And Theory (TREAT) in improving EBP skills and practice compared to a standard JC format for allied health professionals. Concurrently, we explored the feasibility of implementing TREAT JCs in a healthcare setting, by evaluating participating clinicians' perceptions and satisfaction.We conducted an explanatory mixed methods study involving a cluster randomised controlled trial with a nested focus group for the intervention participants. Nine JCs with 126 allied health participants were randomly allocated to receive either the TREAT or standard JC format for 1 h/month for 6 months. We conducted pre-post measures of EBP skills and attitudes using the EBP questionnaire and Assessing Competence in Evidence-Based Medicine tool and a tailored satisfaction and practice change questionnaire. Post-intervention, we also conducted a focus group with TREAT participants to explore their perceptions of the format.There were no significant differences between JC formats in EBP skills, knowledge or attitudes or influence on clinical practice, with participants maintaining intermediate level skills across time points. Participants reported significantly greater satisfaction with the organisation of the TREAT format. Participants in both groups reported positive changes to clinical practice. Perceived outcomes to the TREAT format and facilitating mechanisms were identified including the use of an academic facilitator, group appraisal approach and consistent appraisal tools which assisted skill development and engagement.It is feasible to implement an evidence-based JC for allied health clinicians. While clinicians were more satisfied with the TREAT format, it did not significantly improve their EBP skills, attitudes, knowledge and/or practice, when compared to the standard format. The use of an academic facilitator, group based critical appraisal, and the consistent use of appraisal tools were perceived as useful components of the JC format. A structured JC may maintain EBP skills in allied health clinicians and facilitate engagement, however additional training may be required to further enhance EBP skills.ACTRN12616000811404 Retrospectively registered 21 June 2016." @default.
• W2806644997 created "2018-06-13" @default.
• W2806644997 creator A5018651575 @default.
• W2806644997 creator A5035788226 @default.
• W2806644997 creator A5077993862 @default.
• W2806644997 creator A5080672561 @default.
• W2806644997 date "2018-05-09" @default.
• W2806644997 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2806644997 title "The effectiveness and feasibility of TREAT (Tailoring Research Evidence and Theory) journal clubs in allied health: a randomised controlled trial" @default.
• W2806644997 cites W1967584956 @default.
• W2806644997 cites W1970330286 @default.
• W2806644997 cites W1971347470 @default.
• W2806644997 cites W1972659246 @default.
• W2806644997 cites W1978377270 @default.
• W2806644997 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W2806644997 cites W1984126279 @default.
• W2806644997 cites W1989393454 @default.
• W2806644997 cites W1993985880 @default.
• W2806644997 cites W1997318649 @default.
• W2806644997 cites W2052789777 @default.
• W2806644997 cites W2060112300 @default.
• W2806644997 cites W2062191786 @default.
• W2806644997 cites W2106276795 @default.
• W2806644997 cites W2127957032 @default.
• W2806644997 cites W2129311921 @default.
• W2806644997 cites W2135354639 @default.
• W2806644997 cites W2154529039 @default.
• W2806644997 cites W2162875057 @default.
• W2806644997 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1198-y" @default.
• W2806644997 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5944169" @default.
• W2806644997 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29743051" @default.
• W2806644997 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2806644997 type Work @default.
• W2806644997 sameAs 2806644997 @default.
• W2806644997 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W2806644997 countsByYear W28066449972019 @default.
• W2806644997 countsByYear W28066449972020 @default.
• W2806644997 countsByYear W28066449972021 @default.
• W2806644997 countsByYear W28066449972022 @default.
• W2806644997 countsByYear W28066449972023 @default.
• W2806644997 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2806644997 hasAuthorship W2806644997A5018651575 @default.
• W2806644997 hasAuthorship W2806644997A5035788226 @default.
• W2806644997 hasAuthorship W2806644997A5077993862 @default.
• W2806644997 hasAuthorship W2806644997A5080672561 @default.
• W2806644997 hasBestOaLocation W28066449971 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C100521375 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C141330323 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C152541439 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C2776831358 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C100521375 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C141071460 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C141330323 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C142724271 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C144133560 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C152541439 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C15744967 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C159110408 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C160735492 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C162324750 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C162853370 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C168563851 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C204787440 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C27415008 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C2776831358 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C50522688 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C509550671 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C512399662 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C56995899 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C71924100 @default.
• W2806644997 hasConceptScore W2806644997C77805123 @default.
• W2806644997 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2806644997 hasLocation W28066449971 @default.
• W2806644997 hasLocation W28066449972 @default.
• W2806644997 hasLocation W28066449973 @default.
• W2806644997 hasLocation W28066449974 @default.
• W2806644997 hasLocation W28066449975 @default.
• W2806644997 hasLocation W28066449976 @default.
• W2806644997 hasLocation W28066449977 @default.
• W2806644997 hasOpenAccess W2806644997 @default.
• W2806644997 hasPrimaryLocation W28066449971 @default.
• W2806644997 hasRelatedWork W1541789344 @default.
• W2806644997 hasRelatedWork W1996174694 @default.

• next