FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2806730783> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2806730783 endingPage "307" @default.
• W2806730783 startingPage "301" @default.
• W2806730783 abstract "A comparison between WHODAS 2.0 and Modified Barthel Index: which tool is more suitable for assessing the disability and the recovery rate in orthopedic rehabilitation? Tiziana Galli,1 Paolo Mirata,2 Emanuela Foglia,3 Davide Croce,3,4 Emanuele Porazzi,3 Lucrezia Ferrario,3 Elena Ricci,5 Elisabetta Garagiola,3 Roberta Pagani,3 Giuseppe Banfi6,7 1Department of Functional Recovery and Re-education, Hospital of Saronno, Hospital Authority “ASST Valle Olona”, Saronno, Italy; 2Department of Functional Recovery and Re-education, Hospital of Busto Arsizio, Hospital Authority “ASST Valle Olona”, Busto Arsizio, Italy; 3Centre for Research on Health Economics Social and Health Care Management (CREMS), LIUC - Università Cattaneo, Castellanza, Italy; 4School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; 5Department of Infectious Diseases, Fatebenefratelli Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy; 6Orthopaedics Institute, IRCCS Galeazzi, Milan, Italy; 7San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy Purpose: The aim of the present study was to compare 2 clinical assessment tools, the Modified Barthel Index (currently administered to patients admitted into inpatient rehabilitation units after elective hip or knee arthroplasty) with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 scale, in order to identify which tool is more suitable for assessing the disability and the “recovery rate”.Patients and methods: A perspective multicenter observational study was developed, involving 2 hospital authorities in Italy. Eighty consecutive cases of inpatients were enrolled. Patient’s disability was evaluated using both of the aforementioned tools, before and after the rehabilitation program.Results: The WHODAS 2.0 score was, on average, 12.21% higher than the Modified Barthel Index, before the surgical intervention. Modified Barthel Index measures could be considered as a determinant and a predictor of length of stay.Conclusion: The Modified Barthel Index is limited, since it does not consider a patient’s perspective. The WHODAS 2.0 scale fully considers a patient’s perception of disability. Therefore, both assessment scales should be administered in clinical practice, in order to provide integration of clinical information with a patient’s reported outcome measures. Keywords: disability, Modified Barthel Index, WHODAS 2.0, orthopedics, rehabilitation" @default.
• W2806730783 created "2018-06-13" @default.
• W2806730783 creator A5004542698 @default.
• W2806730783 creator A5011312618 @default.
• W2806730783 creator A5015393193 @default.
• W2806730783 creator A5056828553 @default.
• W2806730783 creator A5058299942 @default.
• W2806730783 creator A5059620963 @default.
• W2806730783 creator A5059918094 @default.
• W2806730783 creator A5068255264 @default.
• W2806730783 creator A5077495376 @default.
• W2806730783 creator A5081790956 @default.
• W2806730783 date "2018-06-01" @default.
• W2806730783 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2806730783 title "A comparison between WHODAS 2.0 and Modified Barthel Index: which tool is more suitable for assessing the disability and the recovery rate in orthopedic rehabilitation?" @default.
• W2806730783 cites W1993890137 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2001455348 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2025910522 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2041560892 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2049465834 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2059764556 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2060547038 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2060708107 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2063296091 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2089012910 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2101508023 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2103298675 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2110899946 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2114168309 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2116810060 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2120398202 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2139190310 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2146473798 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2149025975 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2328835897 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2338837901 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W2768689142 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W4239301040 @default.
• W2806730783 cites W4247126921 @default.
• W2806730783 doi "https://doi.org/10.2147/ceor.s150526" @default.
• W2806730783 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5993025" @default.
• W2806730783 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29892201" @default.
• W2806730783 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2806730783 type Work @default.
• W2806730783 sameAs 2806730783 @default.
• W2806730783 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2806730783 countsByYear W28067307832019 @default.
• W2806730783 countsByYear W28067307832021 @default.
• W2806730783 countsByYear W28067307832022 @default.
• W2806730783 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2806730783 hasAuthorship W2806730783A5004542698 @default.
• W2806730783 hasAuthorship W2806730783A5011312618 @default.
• W2806730783 hasAuthorship W2806730783A5015393193 @default.
• W2806730783 hasAuthorship W2806730783A5056828553 @default.
• W2806730783 hasAuthorship W2806730783A5058299942 @default.
• W2806730783 hasAuthorship W2806730783A5059620963 @default.
• W2806730783 hasAuthorship W2806730783A5059918094 @default.
• W2806730783 hasAuthorship W2806730783A5068255264 @default.
• W2806730783 hasAuthorship W2806730783A5077495376 @default.
• W2806730783 hasAuthorship W2806730783A5081790956 @default.
• W2806730783 hasBestOaLocation W28067307831 @default.
• W2806730783 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2806730783 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2806730783 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2806730783 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W2806730783 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W2806730783 hasConcept C2991681754 @default.
• W2806730783 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W2806730783 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2806730783 hasConceptScore W2806730783C118552586 @default.
• W2806730783 hasConceptScore W2806730783C126322002 @default.
• W2806730783 hasConceptScore W2806730783C1862650 @default.
• W2806730783 hasConceptScore W2806730783C23131810 @default.
• W2806730783 hasConceptScore W2806730783C2778818304 @default.
• W2806730783 hasConceptScore W2806730783C2991681754 @default.
• W2806730783 hasConceptScore W2806730783C68312169 @default.
• W2806730783 hasConceptScore W2806730783C71924100 @default.
• W2806730783 hasLocation W28067307831 @default.
• W2806730783 hasLocation W28067307832 @default.
• W2806730783 hasLocation W28067307833 @default.
• W2806730783 hasLocation W28067307834 @default.
• W2806730783 hasLocation W28067307835 @default.
• W2806730783 hasLocation W28067307836 @default.
• W2806730783 hasOpenAccess W2806730783 @default.
• W2806730783 hasPrimaryLocation W28067307831 @default.
• W2806730783 hasRelatedWork W2098887317 @default.
• W2806730783 hasRelatedWork W2139006891 @default.
• W2806730783 hasRelatedWork W214433981 @default.
• W2806730783 hasRelatedWork W2165322183 @default.
• W2806730783 hasRelatedWork W2347676427 @default.
• W2806730783 hasRelatedWork W2387387737 @default.
• W2806730783 hasRelatedWork W2963580927 @default.
• W2806730783 hasRelatedWork W3031602125 @default.
• W2806730783 hasRelatedWork W4285188650 @default.
• W2806730783 hasRelatedWork W4313257811 @default.
• W2806730783 hasVolume "Volume 10" @default.
• W2806730783 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2806730783 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next