FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2806784382> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2806784382 endingPage "989" @default.
• W2806784382 startingPage "984" @default.
• W2806784382 abstract "Background and Aims Duodenoscopes have been implicated in the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Echoendoscopes could potentially transmit infection. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of standard high-level disinfection (HLD) for radial and linear echoendoscopes and to compare it with that of duodenoscopes. Methods We performed a prospective single-center study sampling echoendoscopes immediately before use, from the working channel (radial and linear echoendoscopes) and the transducer (radial echoendoscope) or elevator mechanism and transducer (linear echoendoscope). The primary outcome was the proportion of echoendoscopes with any culture showing ≥1 MDRO; secondary outcomes included bacterial growth >0 colony forming units (CFUs) and ≥10 CFUs on either sampling location. We compared these findings with duodenoscope cultures from the previously published DISINFECTS trial. Results During the study period, 101 echoendoscopes were sampled (n = 50 radial echoendoscopes, n = 51 linear echoendoscopes). No MDROs were recovered. Bacterial growth >0 CFUs was noted in 6% and ≥10 CFUs in 3% of all echoendoscopes. There was no significant difference in growth between radial and linear echoendoscopes (P = .4 for >0 CFU growth; P = .6 for ≥10 CFUs growth). The proportion of transducer and/or elevator mechanism positive for bacterial growth was significantly higher in duodenoscopes as compared with echoendoscopes (P = .02). Conclusions After standard HLD, no echoendoscope showed MDRO growth, 6% showed >0 CFUs, and 3% showed ≥10 CFUs bacterial growth. Bacterial growth was higher in duodenoscopes at the level of the transducer and/or elevator mechanism when compared with echoendoscopes. Duodenoscopes have been implicated in the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Echoendoscopes could potentially transmit infection. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of standard high-level disinfection (HLD) for radial and linear echoendoscopes and to compare it with that of duodenoscopes. We performed a prospective single-center study sampling echoendoscopes immediately before use, from the working channel (radial and linear echoendoscopes) and the transducer (radial echoendoscope) or elevator mechanism and transducer (linear echoendoscope). The primary outcome was the proportion of echoendoscopes with any culture showing ≥1 MDRO; secondary outcomes included bacterial growth >0 colony forming units (CFUs) and ≥10 CFUs on either sampling location. We compared these findings with duodenoscope cultures from the previously published DISINFECTS trial. During the study period, 101 echoendoscopes were sampled (n = 50 radial echoendoscopes, n = 51 linear echoendoscopes). No MDROs were recovered. Bacterial growth >0 CFUs was noted in 6% and ≥10 CFUs in 3% of all echoendoscopes. There was no significant difference in growth between radial and linear echoendoscopes (P = .4 for >0 CFU growth; P = .6 for ≥10 CFUs growth). The proportion of transducer and/or elevator mechanism positive for bacterial growth was significantly higher in duodenoscopes as compared with echoendoscopes (P = .02). After standard HLD, no echoendoscope showed MDRO growth, 6% showed >0 CFUs, and 3% showed ≥10 CFUs bacterial growth. Bacterial growth was higher in duodenoscopes at the level of the transducer and/or elevator mechanism when compared with echoendoscopes." @default.
• W2806784382 created "2018-06-13" @default.
• W2806784382 creator A5005641244 @default.
• W2806784382 creator A5008664284 @default.
• W2806784382 creator A5018255575 @default.
• W2806784382 creator A5028892007 @default.
• W2806784382 creator A5036469612 @default.
• W2806784382 creator A5038543156 @default.
• W2806784382 creator A5041448186 @default.
• W2806784382 creator A5081628537 @default.
• W2806784382 creator A5088236048 @default.
• W2806784382 creator A5091438710 @default.
• W2806784382 date "2019-05-01" @default.
• W2806784382 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2806784382 title "Prospective assessment of the effectiveness of standard high-level disinfection for echoendoscopes" @default.
• W2806784382 cites W1779603033 @default.
• W2806784382 cites W1966662622 @default.
• W2806784382 cites W2015588726 @default.
• W2806784382 cites W2121467306 @default.
• W2806784382 cites W2128855473 @default.
• W2806784382 cites W2155820482 @default.
• W2806784382 cites W2172224640 @default.
• W2806784382 cites W2332139455 @default.
• W2806784382 cites W2341014481 @default.
• W2806784382 cites W2367524034 @default.
• W2806784382 cites W2608451290 @default.
• W2806784382 cites W2727889920 @default.
• W2806784382 cites W2735645812 @default.
• W2806784382 cites W4248650120 @default.
• W2806784382 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.12.024" @default.
• W2806784382 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30653938" @default.
• W2806784382 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2806784382 type Work @default.
• W2806784382 sameAs 2806784382 @default.
• W2806784382 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2806784382 countsByYear W28067843822019 @default.
• W2806784382 countsByYear W28067843822020 @default.
• W2806784382 countsByYear W28067843822021 @default.
• W2806784382 countsByYear W28067843822022 @default.
• W2806784382 countsByYear W28067843822023 @default.
• W2806784382 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2806784382 hasAuthorship W2806784382A5005641244 @default.
• W2806784382 hasAuthorship W2806784382A5008664284 @default.
• W2806784382 hasAuthorship W2806784382A5018255575 @default.
• W2806784382 hasAuthorship W2806784382A5028892007 @default.
• W2806784382 hasAuthorship W2806784382A5036469612 @default.
• W2806784382 hasAuthorship W2806784382A5038543156 @default.
• W2806784382 hasAuthorship W2806784382A5041448186 @default.
• W2806784382 hasAuthorship W2806784382A5081628537 @default.
• W2806784382 hasAuthorship W2806784382A5088236048 @default.
• W2806784382 hasAuthorship W2806784382A5091438710 @default.
• W2806784382 hasConcept C192285135 @default.
• W2806784382 hasConcept C28826006 @default.
• W2806784382 hasConcept C2994463342 @default.
• W2806784382 hasConcept C3017564526 @default.
• W2806784382 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2806784382 hasConcept C523546767 @default.
• W2806784382 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2806784382 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2806784382 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2806784382 hasConceptScore W2806784382C192285135 @default.
• W2806784382 hasConceptScore W2806784382C28826006 @default.
• W2806784382 hasConceptScore W2806784382C2994463342 @default.
• W2806784382 hasConceptScore W2806784382C3017564526 @default.
• W2806784382 hasConceptScore W2806784382C33923547 @default.
• W2806784382 hasConceptScore W2806784382C523546767 @default.
• W2806784382 hasConceptScore W2806784382C54355233 @default.
• W2806784382 hasConceptScore W2806784382C71924100 @default.
• W2806784382 hasConceptScore W2806784382C86803240 @default.
• W2806784382 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2806784382 hasLocation W28067843821 @default.
• W2806784382 hasLocation W28067843822 @default.
• W2806784382 hasOpenAccess W2806784382 @default.
• W2806784382 hasPrimaryLocation W28067843821 @default.
• W2806784382 hasRelatedWork W1499623581 @default.
• W2806784382 hasRelatedWork W1977032455 @default.
• W2806784382 hasRelatedWork W2008255403 @default.
• W2806784382 hasRelatedWork W2085286181 @default.
• W2806784382 hasRelatedWork W2103096499 @default.
• W2806784382 hasRelatedWork W2114248408 @default.
• W2806784382 hasRelatedWork W2258362492 @default.
• W2806784382 hasRelatedWork W3133601917 @default.
• W2806784382 hasRelatedWork W4233794387 @default.
• W2806784382 hasRelatedWork W4313335007 @default.
• W2806784382 hasVolume "89" @default.
• W2806784382 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2806784382 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2806784382 magId "2806784382" @default.
• W2806784382 workType "article" @default.