FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2807072904> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2807072904 endingPage "88" @default.
• W2807072904 startingPage "84" @default.
• W2807072904 abstract "Cervical spondylosis affects a huge proportion of the middle-aged population. Degenerative changes can occur in multiple regions of the cervical spine typically affecting the joints, intervertebral discs and endplates. These changes lead to compression of adjacent nervous structures, which results in radiculopathic and myelopathic pain. Various treatment modalities are currently available with non-surgical approaches the initial go to if there is no symptomatic cord compression. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, or arthroplasty are the two common surgical approaches if non-surgical treatments fail to relieve symptoms of the patients or there are signs of central cord compression. However, studies have shown that there is an increased risk of adjacent segment disease related to fusion. Cervical disc arthroplasty aims to restore normal range of motion (ROM) in patients with pain and disability due to degenerative disc disease resistant to conservative care. Two common disc prostheses used include M6-C and Mobi-C. Both prostheses comprise a mobile polymer segment sandwiched between two metal endplates with mechanisms resembling an actual intervertebral disc. This study aims to compare the kinematics associated with these prostheses, against the normal range of motion in the non-degenerative population.Patients who underwent M6-C or Mobi-C disc replacements by the senior author from 2012 to 2015 were identified at a single tertiary institution. Routine 3-month postoperative lateral radiographs were analyzed for flexion and extension ROM angles at the involved vertebral level by two independent authors. Data was compared to previous published studies investigating cervical spine ROM of asymptomatic patients.There was no statistical significance in the difference of overall flexion range between M6-C and Mobi-C prostheses. However, overall range of extension of Mobi-C was greater compared to M6-C (P = 0.028). At C5-6 , the range of flexion for both implants were similar but lesser compared to asymptomatic patients (P < 0.001). Range of extension was greater in the Mobi-C group (14.2° ± 5.1°) compared to the M6-C (7.3° ± 4.6°) (P = 0.0009). At C6-7 , there were no statistical differences in both range of flexion and extension between the two prostheses and asymptomatic patients (P > 0.05).The early results regarding restoration of ROM following cervical arthroplasty using either M6-C or Mobi-C prosthesis are encouraging. Long-term follow-up studies are necessary to observe the change in ROM over time with physiological loading and wear patterns." @default.
• W2807072904 created "2018-06-13" @default.
• W2807072904 creator A5017351355 @default.
• W2807072904 creator A5019470174 @default.
• W2807072904 creator A5043238417 @default.
• W2807072904 creator A5074437349 @default.
• W2807072904 date "2018-05-01" @default.
• W2807072904 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2807072904 title "Comparative Study Between M6-C and Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement: Biomechanical Outcomes and Comparison with Normative Data" @default.
• W2807072904 cites W1967709558 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W1978870882 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W1984251971 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W1988006551 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W1989127270 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W1999265529 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2002045499 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2002238228 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2006340675 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2012693175 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2013548093 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2020323361 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2031286844 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2042194155 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2044611322 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2050930565 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2058645377 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2064604882 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2086417779 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2091594307 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2092241379 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2096667967 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2114336772 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2134497792 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2171464552 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2367336449 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2466479892 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2469359254 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W24938532 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2508484360 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2524771751 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2753629539 @default.
• W2807072904 cites W2789795796 @default.
• W2807072904 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12376" @default.
• W2807072904 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6594480" @default.
• W2807072904 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29878713" @default.
• W2807072904 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2807072904 type Work @default.
• W2807072904 sameAs 2807072904 @default.
• W2807072904 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W2807072904 countsByYear W28070729042019 @default.
• W2807072904 countsByYear W28070729042020 @default.
• W2807072904 countsByYear W28070729042021 @default.
• W2807072904 countsByYear W28070729042022 @default.
• W2807072904 countsByYear W28070729042023 @default.
• W2807072904 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2807072904 hasAuthorship W2807072904A5017351355 @default.
• W2807072904 hasAuthorship W2807072904A5019470174 @default.
• W2807072904 hasAuthorship W2807072904A5043238417 @default.
• W2807072904 hasAuthorship W2807072904A5074437349 @default.
• W2807072904 hasBestOaLocation W28070729041 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConcept C2776008035 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConcept C2777755357 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConcept C2778051963 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConcept C2781430139 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConcept C2985379065 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConceptScore W2807072904C141071460 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConceptScore W2807072904C2776008035 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConceptScore W2807072904C2777755357 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConceptScore W2807072904C2778051963 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConceptScore W2807072904C2778336525 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConceptScore W2807072904C2781430139 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConceptScore W2807072904C2908647359 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConceptScore W2807072904C2985379065 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConceptScore W2807072904C36454342 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConceptScore W2807072904C44575665 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConceptScore W2807072904C60465272 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConceptScore W2807072904C71924100 @default.
• W2807072904 hasConceptScore W2807072904C99454951 @default.
• W2807072904 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2807072904 hasLocation W28070729041 @default.
• W2807072904 hasLocation W28070729042 @default.
• W2807072904 hasLocation W28070729043 @default.
• W2807072904 hasLocation W28070729044 @default.
• W2807072904 hasOpenAccess W2807072904 @default.
• W2807072904 hasPrimaryLocation W28070729041 @default.
• W2807072904 hasRelatedWork W133884974 @default.
• W2807072904 hasRelatedWork W1989707575 @default.
• W2807072904 hasRelatedWork W2016539136 @default.
• W2807072904 hasRelatedWork W2043065269 @default.
• W2807072904 hasRelatedWork W2058178697 @default.

• next