FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2807348857> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2807348857 abstract "Systematic reviews (SRs) in the field of neuropathic pain (NeuP) are increasingly important for decision-making. However, methodological flaws in SRs can reduce the validity of conclusions. Hence, it is important to assess the methodological quality of NeuP SRs critically. Additionally, it remains unclear which assessment tool should be used. We studied the methodological quality of SRs published in the field of NeuP and compared two assessment tools. We systematically searched 5 electronic databases to identify SRs of randomized controlled trials of interventions for NeuP available up to March 2015. Two independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality of the studies using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and the revised AMSTAR (R-AMSTAR) tools. The scores were converted to percentiles and ranked into 4 grades to allow comparison between the two checklists. Gwet’s AC1 coefficient was used for interrater reliability assessment. The 97 included SRs had a wide range of methodological quality scores (AMSTAR median (IQR): 6 (5–8) vs. R-AMSTAR median (IQR): 30 (26–35)). The overall agreement score between the 2 raters was 0.62 (95% CI 0.39–0.86) for AMSTAR and 0.62 (95% CI 0.53–0.70) for R-AMSTAR. The 31 Cochrane systematic reviews (CSRs) were consistently ranked higher than the 66 non-Cochrane systematic reviews (NCSRs). The analysis of individual domains showed the best compliance in a comprehensive literature search (item 3) on both checklists. The results for the domain that was the least compliant differed: conflict of interest (item 11) was the item most poorly reported on AMSTAR vs. publication bias assessment (item 10) on R-AMSTAR. A high positive correlation between the total AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR scores for all SRs, as well as for CSRs and NCSRs, was observed. The methodological quality of analyzed SRs in the field of NeuP was not optimal, and CSRs had a higher quality than NCSRs. Both AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR tools produced comparable quality ratings. Our results point out to weaknesses in the methodology of existing SRs on interventions for the management NeuP and call for future improvement by better adherence to analyzed quality checklists, either AMSTAR or R-AMSTAR." @default.
• W2807348857 created "2018-06-13" @default.
• W2807348857 creator A5006600606 @default.
• W2807348857 creator A5008533614 @default.
• W2807348857 creator A5029603443 @default.
• W2807348857 creator A5036816561 @default.
• W2807348857 creator A5049985810 @default.
• W2807348857 creator A5090310491 @default.
• W2807348857 date "2018-05-08" @default.
• W2807348857 modified "2023-10-08" @default.
• W2807348857 title "Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR" @default.
• W2807348857 cites W1990014844 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W1992367258 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W1996445490 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2016474170 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2048005380 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2053619173 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2057967161 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2061572570 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2066896354 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2073644162 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2086026610 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2088600148 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2104818454 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2112824763 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2112864885 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2119790985 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2127894556 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2128412489 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2132643178 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2144840614 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2164777277 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2169649768 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2206489433 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2281318332 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2374521480 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2396846174 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2508652664 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2509245295 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2576387052 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2598591445 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2606656816 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2608873675 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2624852015 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2733992163 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W2734668096 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W57036315 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W600840809 @default.
• W2807348857 cites W753033265 @default.
• W2807348857 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0493-y" @default.
• W2807348857 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5941595" @default.
• W2807348857 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29739339" @default.
• W2807348857 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2807348857 type Work @default.
• W2807348857 sameAs 2807348857 @default.
• W2807348857 citedByCount "24" @default.
• W2807348857 countsByYear W28073488572018 @default.
• W2807348857 countsByYear W28073488572019 @default.
• W2807348857 countsByYear W28073488572020 @default.
• W2807348857 countsByYear W28073488572021 @default.
• W2807348857 countsByYear W28073488572022 @default.
• W2807348857 countsByYear W28073488572023 @default.
• W2807348857 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2807348857 hasAuthorship W2807348857A5006600606 @default.
• W2807348857 hasAuthorship W2807348857A5008533614 @default.
• W2807348857 hasAuthorship W2807348857A5029603443 @default.
• W2807348857 hasAuthorship W2807348857A5036816561 @default.
• W2807348857 hasAuthorship W2807348857A5049985810 @default.
• W2807348857 hasAuthorship W2807348857A5090310491 @default.
• W2807348857 hasBestOaLocation W28073488571 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConcept C61863361 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConceptScore W2807348857C105795698 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConceptScore W2807348857C17744445 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConceptScore W2807348857C1862650 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConceptScore W2807348857C189708586 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConceptScore W2807348857C199539241 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConceptScore W2807348857C2779473830 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConceptScore W2807348857C33923547 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConceptScore W2807348857C61863361 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConceptScore W2807348857C71924100 @default.
• W2807348857 hasConceptScore W2807348857C83849319 @default.
• W2807348857 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2807348857 hasLocation W28073488571 @default.
• W2807348857 hasLocation W28073488572 @default.
• W2807348857 hasLocation W28073488573 @default.
• W2807348857 hasLocation W28073488574 @default.
• W2807348857 hasLocation W28073488575 @default.
• W2807348857 hasOpenAccess W2807348857 @default.
• W2807348857 hasPrimaryLocation W28073488571 @default.
• W2807348857 hasRelatedWork W1978924334 @default.
• W2807348857 hasRelatedWork W2055553778 @default.

• next