FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2807760941> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2807760941 endingPage "S90" @default.
• W2807760941 startingPage "S90" @default.
• W2807760941 abstract "PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to compare agility, power and strength values as tested for NCAA Division III male basketball, baseball and football athletes to published NCAA Division I percentile rank values. METHODS: NCAA Division III (DIII) male basketball (BKB), baseball (BSB) and football (FB) subjects were tested in the pro agility [PRO: BKB (n = 19), BSB (n = 136), FB (n = 143)]; vertical jump [VJ: BKB (n = 46), BSB (n = 138), FB (n = 235)]; back squat [BS: BKB (n = 69), BSB (n = 275), FB (n = 140)]; and bench press [BP: BKB (n = 75), BSB (n = 172), FB (n = 268)]. Percentile rank (PR) comparisons were then made to NCAA Division I (DI) counterparts. Pearson product moment correlation coefficients were also computed for all DIII athlete measures. RESULTS: The following mean values were found for the DIII athletes with the closest corresponding DI athlete PR: · PRO BKB (4.35s ± 0.16; 70%); PRO BSB (4.52 ± 0.20; 20%); PRO FB (4.78 ± 0.30; 20%) · VJ BKB (25.8in ± 2.8; 30%); VJ BSB (24.61 ± 2.42; 50%) VJ FB (26.59 ± 3.55; 40%) · BS BKB (276.8lbs ± 48.1; 60%); BS BSB (275.0 ± 53,5; 50%) BS FB (357.0 ± 66.84; 20%) · BP BKB (200.6lbs ± 41.5; 30%); BP BSB (214.0 ± 52.2; 40%) BP FB (268.6 ± 48.68; 10%) A significant correlation (r = −0.744; p<0.001) was found for FB between PRO and VJ. No correlations were found at or above r = .60 for any of the other measures examined for each team. Examination of the BP and BS results indicated BP to BS ratios of 72.5%, 77.8% and 75% for BKB, BSB and FB respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DIII BKB athletes were at or above the 50th percentile as compared to DI BKB athletes in the PRO and BS tests (1). DIII BSB athletes were at or above the 50th percentile as compared to DI BSB athletes in the VJ and BS tests (1). DIII FB athletes were not above the 40th percentile in any measure (1). There are several factors which could have an effect on these comparisons. 1.) Depending on their preferred style of play coaches may recruit different types of athletes. For example a basketball coach that plays more of a perimeter style may want a smaller more agile athlete than a coach with a style focused more on an inside game. A football coach using a triple option offense may recruit smaller more mobile players. 2.) Strength and conditioning program design varies from institution to institution. Some institutions may put more of an emphasis on upper body or lower body strength than others. 3.) DI athletes are often more genetically or physically gifted than DIII athletes. The BP to BS ratios found were slightly lower for BKB and BSB and similar for FB to previously published values (2). Practical Applications: There is not much published performance measure data for DIII athletes. Strength and conditioning professionals working at the DIII level need normative data to help gauge the effectiveness of their programs focusing on agility, power and speed development." @default.
• W2807760941 created "2018-06-21" @default.
• W2807760941 creator A5042905744 @default.
• W2807760941 creator A5051986821 @default.
• W2807760941 date "2011-03-01" @default.
• W2807760941 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2807760941 title "Comparison of Agility, Power and Strength Values Between NCAA Division III and NCAA Division I Male Basketball, Baseball and Football Athletes" @default.
• W2807760941 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jsc.0000395722.91869.96" @default.
• W2807760941 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2807760941 type Work @default.
• W2807760941 sameAs 2807760941 @default.
• W2807760941 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2807760941 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2807760941 hasAuthorship W2807760941A5042905744 @default.
• W2807760941 hasAuthorship W2807760941A5051986821 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConcept C103189561 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConcept C122048520 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConcept C2778444522 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConcept C2781054738 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConceptScore W2807760941C103189561 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConceptScore W2807760941C105795698 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConceptScore W2807760941C122048520 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConceptScore W2807760941C15744967 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConceptScore W2807760941C166957645 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConceptScore W2807760941C1862650 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConceptScore W2807760941C205649164 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConceptScore W2807760941C2778444522 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConceptScore W2807760941C2781054738 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConceptScore W2807760941C33923547 @default.
• W2807760941 hasConceptScore W2807760941C71924100 @default.
• W2807760941 hasLocation W28077609411 @default.
• W2807760941 hasOpenAccess W2807760941 @default.
• W2807760941 hasPrimaryLocation W28077609411 @default.
• W2807760941 hasRelatedWork W1997506940 @default.
• W2807760941 hasRelatedWork W2350775915 @default.
• W2807760941 hasRelatedWork W2357151527 @default.
• W2807760941 hasRelatedWork W2362227174 @default.
• W2807760941 hasRelatedWork W2369236739 @default.
• W2807760941 hasRelatedWork W2803966683 @default.
• W2807760941 hasRelatedWork W2954695573 @default.
• W2807760941 hasRelatedWork W3041726547 @default.
• W2807760941 hasRelatedWork W3083844390 @default.
• W2807760941 hasRelatedWork W4234982215 @default.
• W2807760941 hasVolume "25" @default.
• W2807760941 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2807760941 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2807760941 magId "2807760941" @default.
• W2807760941 workType "article" @default.