Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2807855873> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2807855873 endingPage "232596711877904" @default.
- W2807855873 startingPage "232596711877904" @default.
- W2807855873 abstract "There are limited data comparing the outcomes of all-inside versus inside-out meniscal repair techniques.To assess failure rates and clinical outcomes after the surgical repair of bucket-handle meniscal tears utilizing either an all-inside or inside-out technique.Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Patients with bucket-handle meniscal tears undergoing all-inside or inside-out repair at a single institution between 2003 and 2013 were analyzed. A total of 28 mensici repaired utilizing second-generation all-inside suturing devices and 42 menisci repaired using an inside-out technique were eligible for inclusion. Rigorous propensity matching was performed on the basis of age, sex, tear laterality, rim width, and concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), resulting in a total of 40 patients equally distributed between the 2 repair techniques for comparison. Retear-free survival as well as preoperative and postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Tegner scores and physical examination findings were subsequently analyzed.Twenty patients who underwent all-inside repair (14 male; mean age, 23.7 ± 6.7 years) were successfully propensity matched to 20 patients who underwent inside-out meniscal repair (15 male; mean age, 22.5 ± 7.6 years), with a mean retear-free follow-up of 4.4 years (range, 2.5-7.4 years). Four (20%) all-inside repairs and 4 (20%) inside-out repairs failed over the course of follow-up (P > .999), with a mean time to failure of 2.7 years (range, 1.3-4.4 years) and 5.0 years (range, 0.8-7.5 years), respectively (P = .25). Increasing patient age trended toward a decreased clinical retear rate, independent of the repair technique (hazard ratio, 0.86; P = .056). There were no significant differences in the Tegner scores, IKDC scores, or range of motion between the groups as a whole or when subcategorizing by age, sex, body mass index, tear complexity, rim width, isolated versus concomitant ACLR, or medial- versus lateral-sided repair. There were no complications in the all-inside group, while there was a 10% rate of minor complications in the inside-out group (P = .49).Overall, satisfactory clinical outcomes are achievable at short-term to midterm follow-up with both inside-out and all-inside repair techniques of bucket-handle meniscal tears in rigorously matched patients with similar meniscal tear patterns." @default.
- W2807855873 created "2018-06-21" @default.
- W2807855873 creator A5005881084 @default.
- W2807855873 creator A5006975097 @default.
- W2807855873 creator A5010764812 @default.
- W2807855873 creator A5029451985 @default.
- W2807855873 creator A5037385720 @default.
- W2807855873 creator A5047816429 @default.
- W2807855873 creator A5066472954 @default.
- W2807855873 date "2018-06-01" @default.
- W2807855873 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2807855873 title "Comparative Outcomes of All-Inside Versus Inside-Out Repair of Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears: A Propensity-Matched Analysis" @default.
- W2807855873 cites W1716794597 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W1891913464 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W1931673841 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W1949599896 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W1969552102 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W1971184014 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W1977106770 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W1978333392 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W1981453244 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W1988213753 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W1990855490 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W1994574175 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W1994955160 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2010085227 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2010211119 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2012398701 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2017295907 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2026484716 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2030835954 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2035956183 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2036193982 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2046506746 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2054969894 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2055556990 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2060484561 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2062367942 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2070470498 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2072197166 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2072500831 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2072876024 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2079965732 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2088286825 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2100375466 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2111635289 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2124469075 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2132039549 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2142885247 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2151924814 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2158685362 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2163326691 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2166206077 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2170772498 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2198474910 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2244474460 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2261237464 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2331949586 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2408816119 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2413597759 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2418304044 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2466845279 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2616479420 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2737597862 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W2746541693 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W4239884874 @default.
- W2807855873 cites W4300583872 @default.
- W2807855873 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118779045" @default.
- W2807855873 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6024537" @default.
- W2807855873 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29977943" @default.
- W2807855873 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
- W2807855873 type Work @default.
- W2807855873 sameAs 2807855873 @default.
- W2807855873 citedByCount "33" @default.
- W2807855873 countsByYear W28078558732019 @default.
- W2807855873 countsByYear W28078558732020 @default.
- W2807855873 countsByYear W28078558732021 @default.
- W2807855873 countsByYear W28078558732022 @default.
- W2807855873 countsByYear W28078558732023 @default.
- W2807855873 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2807855873 hasAuthorship W2807855873A5005881084 @default.
- W2807855873 hasAuthorship W2807855873A5006975097 @default.
- W2807855873 hasAuthorship W2807855873A5010764812 @default.
- W2807855873 hasAuthorship W2807855873A5029451985 @default.
- W2807855873 hasAuthorship W2807855873A5037385720 @default.
- W2807855873 hasAuthorship W2807855873A5047816429 @default.
- W2807855873 hasAuthorship W2807855873A5066472954 @default.
- W2807855873 hasBestOaLocation W28078558731 @default.
- W2807855873 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
- W2807855873 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2807855873 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2807855873 hasConcept C17923572 @default.
- W2807855873 hasConcept C189178095 @default.
- W2807855873 hasConcept C2778275304 @default.
- W2807855873 hasConcept C2778434673 @default.
- W2807855873 hasConcept C2779384505 @default.
- W2807855873 hasConcept C2780887989 @default.
- W2807855873 hasConcept C61511704 @default.