FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2808069815> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2808069815 endingPage "e1690" @default.
• W2808069815 startingPage "e1689" @default.
• W2808069815 abstract "Thank you for the opportunity to respond to Hu and Gifford's comments (Hu & Gifford, 2018). We appreciated their acknowledgement of our findings about the factors influencing the successful implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP). The authors described leadership behaviours as having a significant role in implementing evidence-based practice. Although we did not specifically discuss leadership in the previous paper (Cheng, Broome, Feng, & Hu, 2017a), we agree and acknowledge the importance of leadership during evidence implementation. It was interesting to read about Hu and Gifford's work in progress related to the study of leadership behaviours in EBP. In subsequent papers, we have further explicated the role of leaders in EBP and therefore wish to offer further insights in this commentary. Hu and Gifford (2018) described two measures (i.e., O-MILe and ILS) that have been developed and validated to assess leadership in the EBP context based on the literature. These measures will be very important to scholars of EBP implementation. In our work, three questions arose related to leadership in this context and go beyond just the behaviours evidenced by leaders: (a) Who are the leaders for evidence implementation; (b) what is essential preparation for the leaders; and (c) how do the leaders manifest their roles during the implementation. By reviewing the 24 implementation projects, we found many formal leaders, for example, nurse managers, staff nurses and faculty members. Their leadership is exemplified and differentiated by the implementation approaches they take, for example, top-down, bottom-up and outsider-in (Cheng, Broome, Feng, & Hu, 2017b). Meanwhile, informal leader that might complement the formal project leaders’ role during evidence implementation was also evident. For instance, staff nurse champions emerged in some projects to assist the leaders in educating colleagues, auditing actual performance and solving problems. Some staff nurses who were informal leaders also expressed their wiliness to become a formal leader to fill a new “gap” which became evident during implementation. This pattern of formal and informal leadership intertwined together to make the evidence “take root” in nursing practice. Thus, there is a need to prepare evidence implementation leadership at all levels of the health system. Although there had not been any formal requirements, we did find some common characteristics among those “successful/effective” formal and informal leaders. First, the leaders had a passion about looking for the latest evidence to solve patient care problems in nursing practice. They were aware of the needs of clinical settings and knew exactly what the gaps were. Second, they shared and exchanged their views with stakeholders across disciplines, for example, administrators, medicine, nursing, pharmacy, physiotherapy, logistics and information systems. Sometimes, they took on the informal role of “knowledge broker” as part of the leadership role, by identifying key attributes of the evidence that might be used and analysed the context and achieve the census among the stakeholders on implementation plans. Third, during the implementation, the leaders wisely allocated resources and struck a common ground where each stakeholder would be able to understand and achieve their own goal. In order to move the projects forward, they had to keep alert constantly to align the overlapping goals between person and system. Finally, leaders were able to foresee the proximal and long-term outcomes, as well as tangible and intangible impacts from evidence implementation. This vision lay behind their every act (even sacrificing personal time) and kept them persisting on this evidence implementation leadership journey. We realise that some of these behaviours are measured in Ottawa Model of Implementation Leadership (Gifford, Graham, Ehrhart, Davies, & Aarons, 2017). However, the qualitative approach that we took enabled us to paint a better picture of the “process of leadership” versus just the isolated behaviours evidenced by leaders as measured by quantitative scales. We found that leaders were often formally appointed by the hospitals, while other times they naturally took the lead. However, in either situation, they engaged in a variety of behaviours designed to keep “the projects moving.” For example, they responded to a particular clinical context, worked in a collective manner, engaged in strategic planning and functional management, exhibiting multifaceted behaviours at multiple levels. Support from higher administration was critical for the leaders fully play out their roles, especially for the bottom-up and outsider leaders. In a more recently published paper in the Journal of Nursing Management (Cheng, Feng, Hu, & Broome, 2018), we further analysed data from the previous study and provided exemplars for a better understanding of the nurse managers’ leadership role during evidence implementation. We found it important to consider “hierarchy and obedience” as important concepts in the mainstream culture of the Chinese existing health care system, and suggest enhancing managerial support with recognition of their efforts and preparation of the leaders as facilitators to integration of the best available evidence into nurses’ workflow. As Hu and Gifford pointed out in their commentary, leadership is much more than a role, position or status. Their work, as well as ours and others, has begun to build a more comprehensive picture of leadership and provide a deeper and broader understanding of how evidence-based practice can be achieved. However, the leadership for evidence implementation needs further exploration from the perspectives of staff nurse leaders, outsider leaders as well as the informal nursing leaders in various levels that assisted in compensating the formal leadership of nursing managers. None. None to declare." @default.
• W2808069815 created "2018-06-21" @default.
• W2808069815 creator A5036167691 @default.
• W2808069815 creator A5082033852 @default.
• W2808069815 creator A5086630158 @default.
• W2808069815 creator A5090869564 @default.
• W2808069815 date "2018-07-26" @default.
• W2808069815 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2808069815 title "Response to Commentary on Cheng, Broome, Feng, and Hu (2017) Leadership behaviours play a significant role in implementing evidence-based practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2018;27:e1684-e1685" @default.
• W2808069815 cites W2605202949 @default.
• W2808069815 cites W2741291978 @default.
• W2808069815 cites W2747293783 @default.
• W2808069815 cites W2792592000 @default.
• W2808069815 cites W2792657079 @default.
• W2808069815 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14547" @default.
• W2808069815 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29893004" @default.
• W2808069815 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2808069815 type Work @default.
• W2808069815 sameAs 2808069815 @default.
• W2808069815 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2808069815 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2808069815 hasAuthorship W2808069815A5036167691 @default.
• W2808069815 hasAuthorship W2808069815A5082033852 @default.
• W2808069815 hasAuthorship W2808069815A5086630158 @default.
• W2808069815 hasAuthorship W2808069815A5090869564 @default.
• W2808069815 hasBestOaLocation W28080698151 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C141330323 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C197386563 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C2777880217 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C2780271678 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C3018282236 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C38775462 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C141330323 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C142724271 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C151730666 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C15744967 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C162324750 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C17744445 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C187736073 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C197386563 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C204787440 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C2777880217 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C2779343474 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C2780271678 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C3018282236 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C38652104 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C38775462 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C39549134 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C41008148 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C509550671 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C71924100 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C77805123 @default.
• W2808069815 hasConceptScore W2808069815C86803240 @default.
• W2808069815 hasIssue "23-24" @default.
• W2808069815 hasLocation W28080698151 @default.
• W2808069815 hasLocation W28080698152 @default.
• W2808069815 hasOpenAccess W2808069815 @default.
• W2808069815 hasPrimaryLocation W28080698151 @default.
• W2808069815 hasRelatedWork W112411758 @default.
• W2808069815 hasRelatedWork W187271181 @default.
• W2808069815 hasRelatedWork W2022058158 @default.
• W2808069815 hasRelatedWork W2094020058 @default.
• W2808069815 hasRelatedWork W2133445591 @default.
• W2808069815 hasRelatedWork W2217266829 @default.
• W2808069815 hasRelatedWork W2591512215 @default.
• W2808069815 hasRelatedWork W2769699065 @default.
• W2808069815 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2808069815 hasRelatedWork W3182157933 @default.
• W2808069815 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W2808069815 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2808069815 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2808069815 magId "2808069815" @default.
• W2808069815 workType "article" @default.