FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2810419195> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2810419195 endingPage "E3" @default.
• W2810419195 startingPage "E3" @default.
• W2810419195 abstract "OBJECTIVE Walter E. Dandy described for the first time the anatomical course of the superior petrosal vein (SPV) and its significance during surgery for trigeminal neuralgia. The patient’s safety after sacrifice of this vein is a challenging question, with conflicting views in current literature. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the current surgical considerations regarding Dandy’s vein, as well as provide a concise review of the complications after its obliteration. METHODS A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A thorough literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane database; articles were selected systematically based on the PRISMA protocol and reviewed completely, and then relevant data were summarized and discussed. RESULTS A total of 35 publications pertaining to the SPV were included and reviewed. Although certain studies report almost negligible complications of SPV sectioning, there are reports demonstrating the deleterious effects of SPV obliteration when achieving adequate exposure in surgical pathologies like trigeminal neuralgia, vestibular schwannoma, and petroclival meningioma. The incidence of complications after SPV sacrifice (32/50 cases in the authors’ series) is 2/32 (6.2%), and that reported in various case series varies from 0.01% to 31%. It includes hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic venous infarction of the cerebellum, sigmoid thrombosis, cerebellar hemorrhage, midbrain and pontine infarct, intracerebral hematoma, cerebellar and brainstem edema, acute hydrocephalus, peduncular hallucinosis, hearing loss, facial nerve palsy, coma, and even death. In many studies, the difference in incidence of complications between the SPV-sacrificed group and the SPV-preserved group was significant. CONCLUSIONS The preservation of Dandy’s vein is a neurosurgical dilemma. Literature review and experiences from large series suggest that obliterating the vein of Dandy while approaching the superior cerebellopontine angle corridor may be associated with negligible complications. However, the counterview cannot be neglected in light of some series showing an up to 30% complication rate from SPV sacrifice. This review provides the insight that although the incidence of complications due to SPV obliteration is low, they can happen, and the sequelae might be worse than the natural history of the existing pathology. Therefore, SPV preservation should be attempted to optimize patient outcome." @default.
• W2810419195 created "2018-07-10" @default.
• W2810419195 creator A5018218427 @default.
• W2810419195 creator A5019640792 @default.
• W2810419195 creator A5025711516 @default.
• W2810419195 creator A5079615525 @default.
• W2810419195 creator A5088352236 @default.
• W2810419195 creator A5088626058 @default.
• W2810419195 creator A5091423572 @default.
• W2810419195 date "2018-07-01" @default.
• W2810419195 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2810419195 title "Safety profile of superior petrosal vein (the vein of Dandy) sacrifice in neurosurgical procedures: a systematic review" @default.
• W2810419195 cites W1665459988 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W1975988533 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W1979307596 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W1981166604 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W1992712601 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W1999630665 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2007838624 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2018728768 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2027152989 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2035781489 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2039614150 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2044494869 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2047067596 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2056586432 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2064166452 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2066108731 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2067091400 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2069113778 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2083124067 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2086848124 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2092735877 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2102395971 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2128095485 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2156633304 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2385842500 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2419750417 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2546945240 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2548291854 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2597656085 @default.
• W2810419195 cites W2618594616 @default.
• W2810419195 doi "https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.4.focus18133" @default.
• W2810419195 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29961377" @default.
• W2810419195 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2810419195 type Work @default.
• W2810419195 sameAs 2810419195 @default.
• W2810419195 citedByCount "45" @default.
• W2810419195 countsByYear W28104191952019 @default.
• W2810419195 countsByYear W28104191952020 @default.
• W2810419195 countsByYear W28104191952021 @default.
• W2810419195 countsByYear W28104191952022 @default.
• W2810419195 countsByYear W28104191952023 @default.
• W2810419195 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2810419195 hasAuthorship W2810419195A5018218427 @default.
• W2810419195 hasAuthorship W2810419195A5019640792 @default.
• W2810419195 hasAuthorship W2810419195A5025711516 @default.
• W2810419195 hasAuthorship W2810419195A5079615525 @default.
• W2810419195 hasAuthorship W2810419195A5088352236 @default.
• W2810419195 hasAuthorship W2810419195A5088626058 @default.
• W2810419195 hasAuthorship W2810419195A5091423572 @default.
• W2810419195 hasBestOaLocation W28104191951 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConcept C12770488 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConcept C2778134817 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConcept C2778379562 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConcept C2779662492 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConcept C2780355897 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConcept C2780868729 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConceptScore W2810419195C12770488 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConceptScore W2810419195C141071460 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConceptScore W2810419195C17744445 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConceptScore W2810419195C189708586 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConceptScore W2810419195C199539241 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConceptScore W2810419195C2778134817 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConceptScore W2810419195C2778379562 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConceptScore W2810419195C2779473830 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConceptScore W2810419195C2779662492 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConceptScore W2810419195C2780355897 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConceptScore W2810419195C2780868729 @default.
• W2810419195 hasConceptScore W2810419195C71924100 @default.
• W2810419195 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2810419195 hasLocation W28104191951 @default.
• W2810419195 hasLocation W28104191952 @default.
• W2810419195 hasOpenAccess W2810419195 @default.
• W2810419195 hasPrimaryLocation W28104191951 @default.
• W2810419195 hasRelatedWork W1791428387 @default.
• W2810419195 hasRelatedWork W2044291524 @default.
• W2810419195 hasRelatedWork W2068704557 @default.
• W2810419195 hasRelatedWork W2131661565 @default.
• W2810419195 hasRelatedWork W2392047177 @default.
• W2810419195 hasRelatedWork W3028869772 @default.
• W2810419195 hasRelatedWork W3030433494 @default.

• next