FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2810830103> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2810830103 endingPage "395.e11" @default.
• W2810830103 startingPage "395.e1" @default.
• W2810830103 abstract "Background Competency-based education requires educators to use simulation training for the purposes of education and assessment of resident trainees. Research demonstrates that improvement in surgical skills acquired in a simulated environment is transferrable to the operative environment. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection, opening the retroperitoneal space and identifying the ureter, is a fundamental skill for gynecologists. Integrating simulation models into a formal and comprehensive curriculum for teaching ureterolysis could translate to increased surgical competency. Objective Our goal was to validate a comprehensive curriculum for laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection for the purpose of identification of the ureter by evaluating intraoperative performance. Study Design A comprehensive curriculum, encompassing didactic and technical skills components and using a previously developed pelvic model, was designed to teach laparoscopic ureterolysis. Novice surgeons (postgraduate years 3–5) were recruited. Participants completed precurriculum and postcurriculum multiple-choice questionnaires to evaluate a didactic component. Preperformance and postperformance on the model was video-recorded. As part of the technical component, participants received constructive feedback from expert surgeons on how to perform laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection using the simulation model. Participants were then video-recorded performing laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection in the operating room within 3 months of the curriculum. All videos were blindly assessed by an expert using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills tool. At the conclusion of the study, participants completed a course evaluation. Results Thirty novice gynecologic surgeons were recruited. High baseline knowledge of ureteric anatomy and injury (multiple-choice question score median and interquartile range) still significantly increased from 7 (5–7.25) precurriculum to 8 (7–9) postcurriculum (P < .001). The median (interquartile range) technical Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills score increased significantly from 24.5 (23–28.25) precurriculum to 30 (29.75–32) postcurriculum (P < .001). Video-recordings were completed for 23 participants performing laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection in the operating room. Intraoperative Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills scores (median of 29 [interquartile range 27–32]) correlated with postcurriculum Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills scores on the model (r = 0.53, P = .01). The ureter was identified intraoperatively by 91% (n = 21/23) of participants. The majority of residents (81%, n = 21/26) were more comfortable completing a supervised retroperitoneal dissection as a result of participating in the curriculum. Residents believed that this model would be useful to enhance skills acquisition prior to performing the skill in the operating room (65%, n = 17/26). Conclusion A comprehensive retroperitoneal dissection curriculum showed improvement in cognitive knowledge and technical skills, which also translated to competent performance in the operating room. In addition to the objective measures, residents believed that their skills acquisition was improved following course completion. Competency-based education requires educators to use simulation training for the purposes of education and assessment of resident trainees. Research demonstrates that improvement in surgical skills acquired in a simulated environment is transferrable to the operative environment. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection, opening the retroperitoneal space and identifying the ureter, is a fundamental skill for gynecologists. Integrating simulation models into a formal and comprehensive curriculum for teaching ureterolysis could translate to increased surgical competency. Our goal was to validate a comprehensive curriculum for laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection for the purpose of identification of the ureter by evaluating intraoperative performance. A comprehensive curriculum, encompassing didactic and technical skills components and using a previously developed pelvic model, was designed to teach laparoscopic ureterolysis. Novice surgeons (postgraduate years 3–5) were recruited. Participants completed precurriculum and postcurriculum multiple-choice questionnaires to evaluate a didactic component. Preperformance and postperformance on the model was video-recorded. As part of the technical component, participants received constructive feedback from expert surgeons on how to perform laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection using the simulation model. Participants were then video-recorded performing laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection in the operating room within 3 months of the curriculum. All videos were blindly assessed by an expert using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills tool. At the conclusion of the study, participants completed a course evaluation. Thirty novice gynecologic surgeons were recruited. High baseline knowledge of ureteric anatomy and injury (multiple-choice question score median and interquartile range) still significantly increased from 7 (5–7.25) precurriculum to 8 (7–9) postcurriculum (P < .001). The median (interquartile range) technical Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills score increased significantly from 24.5 (23–28.25) precurriculum to 30 (29.75–32) postcurriculum (P < .001). Video-recordings were completed for 23 participants performing laparoscopic retroperitoneal dissection in the operating room. Intraoperative Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills scores (median of 29 [interquartile range 27–32]) correlated with postcurriculum Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills scores on the model (r = 0.53, P = .01). The ureter was identified intraoperatively by 91% (n = 21/23) of participants. The majority of residents (81%, n = 21/26) were more comfortable completing a supervised retroperitoneal dissection as a result of participating in the curriculum. Residents believed that this model would be useful to enhance skills acquisition prior to performing the skill in the operating room (65%, n = 17/26). A comprehensive retroperitoneal dissection curriculum showed improvement in cognitive knowledge and technical skills, which also translated to competent performance in the operating room. In addition to the objective measures, residents believed that their skills acquisition was improved following course completion." @default.
• W2810830103 created "2018-07-10" @default.
• W2810830103 creator A5011738377 @default.
• W2810830103 creator A5024334233 @default.
• W2810830103 creator A5042977318 @default.
• W2810830103 creator A5065986022 @default.
• W2810830103 date "2018-10-01" @default.
• W2810830103 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2810830103 title "Implementation and validation of a retroperitoneal dissection curriculum" @default.
• W2810830103 cites W1511289422 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W1511889812 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W1977982031 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W2002422769 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W2005426419 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W2034723308 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W2036488918 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W2036619716 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W2059959577 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W2061776473 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W2078193881 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W2081503431 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W2089549988 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W2129299277 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W2157949837 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W2291902983 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W2315264017 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W2335144705 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W2344882701 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W2345135521 @default.
• W2810830103 cites W2729907919 @default.
• W2810830103 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.06.021" @default.
• W2810830103 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30278879" @default.
• W2810830103 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2810830103 type Work @default.
• W2810830103 sameAs 2810830103 @default.
• W2810830103 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2810830103 countsByYear W28108301032020 @default.
• W2810830103 countsByYear W28108301032021 @default.
• W2810830103 countsByYear W28108301032022 @default.
• W2810830103 countsByYear W28108301032023 @default.
• W2810830103 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2810830103 hasAuthorship W2810830103A5011738377 @default.
• W2810830103 hasAuthorship W2810830103A5024334233 @default.
• W2810830103 hasAuthorship W2810830103A5042977318 @default.
• W2810830103 hasAuthorship W2810830103A5065986022 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConcept C2775862295 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConcept C2776664737 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConcept C2780639846 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConcept C2781040948 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConcept C77411442 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConceptScore W2810830103C126322002 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConceptScore W2810830103C141071460 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConceptScore W2810830103C15744967 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConceptScore W2810830103C19417346 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConceptScore W2810830103C19527891 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConceptScore W2810830103C2775862295 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConceptScore W2810830103C2776664737 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConceptScore W2810830103C2780047204 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConceptScore W2810830103C2780639846 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConceptScore W2810830103C2781040948 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConceptScore W2810830103C47177190 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConceptScore W2810830103C509550671 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConceptScore W2810830103C61434518 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConceptScore W2810830103C71924100 @default.
• W2810830103 hasConceptScore W2810830103C77411442 @default.
• W2810830103 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2810830103 hasLocation W28108301031 @default.
• W2810830103 hasLocation W28108301032 @default.
• W2810830103 hasOpenAccess W2810830103 @default.
• W2810830103 hasPrimaryLocation W28108301031 @default.
• W2810830103 hasRelatedWork W2191920272 @default.
• W2810830103 hasRelatedWork W2409663871 @default.
• W2810830103 hasRelatedWork W2415242886 @default.
• W2810830103 hasRelatedWork W2416098052 @default.
• W2810830103 hasRelatedWork W2416850164 @default.
• W2810830103 hasRelatedWork W2418510523 @default.
• W2810830103 hasRelatedWork W2462406275 @default.
• W2810830103 hasRelatedWork W2901117610 @default.
• W2810830103 hasRelatedWork W2981089756 @default.
• W2810830103 hasRelatedWork W4289768521 @default.
• W2810830103 hasVolume "219" @default.
• W2810830103 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2810830103 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2810830103 magId "2810830103" @default.
• W2810830103 workType "article" @default.