FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2811116736> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2811116736 endingPage "536" @default.
• W2811116736 startingPage "530" @default.
• W2811116736 abstract "Statement of problem The use of resin patterns to produce partial coverage restorations is poorly documented. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the marginal and internal fit accuracy of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic inlays obtained from wax or resin patterns and fabricated with digital and conventional techniques. Material and methods A dentoform mandibular first molar was prepared for a mesio-occlusal ceramic inlay. Six groups of 15 inlays were obtained by conventional impression and manual wax (group CICW) or resin patterns (group CICR); conventional impression, laboratory scanning of the stone die, CAD-CAM milled wax (group CIDW), or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) blocks (group CIDR); and scanning of the master preparation with an intraoral scanner, CAD-CAM milled wax (group DSDW), or PMMA blocks (DSDR). The same design was applied to produce the wax and PMMA patterns in the last 4 groups. The replica technique was used to measure marginal and internal fit under stereomicroscopy. Mixed-model ANOVA was applied to assess differences according to the techniques, materials, and discrepancy location (α=.05). Results The results demonstrated significant effects of the technique (P<.001), material (P=.009), and discrepancy location (P<.001) on fit measurements. Marginal discrepancy was only affected by the technique (P<.001), with the digital approaches yielding the smallest marginal discrepancy (23.5 ±3.6 μm), followed by the conventional digital techniques (31.1 ±5.6 μm) and finally by the conventional (42.8 ±7.2 μm) techniques. Internal fit was significantly influenced only by the material with lower discrepancy in wax (75.2 ±9.0 μm) than in resin patterns (84.7 ±15.1 μm). The internal discrepancy was significantly larger than the marginal discrepancy in all groups (P<.001). Conclusions Inlays generated from conventional wax and resin patterns tend to show higher marginal discrepancies than conventional digital and full digital patterns. Wax and resin materials yield similar marginal fit accuracies irrespective of the impression/manufacturing technique. Better internal fit was shown in wax than in resin patterns, regardless of the technique." @default.
• W2811116736 created "2018-07-10" @default.
• W2811116736 creator A5011389522 @default.
• W2811116736 creator A5011692695 @default.
• W2811116736 creator A5026485627 @default.
• W2811116736 creator A5068295456 @default.
• W2811116736 date "2018-10-01" @default.
• W2811116736 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2811116736 title "Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies" @default.
• W2811116736 cites W1904073975 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W1980949141 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W1994363425 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2005594769 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2014308798 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2019871599 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2062470946 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2062750634 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2069894737 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2075611807 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2078297601 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2083349905 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2098366473 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2122453136 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2132697804 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2143307991 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2147800395 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2155958649 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2290108649 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2291383008 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2305080800 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2410780418 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2470883054 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2504236928 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2518583786 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2610042355 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2758855011 @default.
• W2811116736 cites W2767905608 @default.
• W2811116736 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.006" @default.
• W2811116736 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30318049" @default.
• W2811116736 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2811116736 type Work @default.
• W2811116736 sameAs 2811116736 @default.
• W2811116736 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W2811116736 countsByYear W28111167362020 @default.
• W2811116736 countsByYear W28111167362021 @default.
• W2811116736 countsByYear W28111167362022 @default.
• W2811116736 countsByYear W28111167362023 @default.
• W2811116736 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2811116736 hasAuthorship W2811116736A5011389522 @default.
• W2811116736 hasAuthorship W2811116736A5011692695 @default.
• W2811116736 hasAuthorship W2811116736A5026485627 @default.
• W2811116736 hasAuthorship W2811116736A5068295456 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConcept C134132462 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConcept C153033020 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConcept C190719290 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConcept C2776684213 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConcept C2910996203 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConceptScore W2811116736C134132462 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConceptScore W2811116736C136764020 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConceptScore W2811116736C153033020 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConceptScore W2811116736C159985019 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConceptScore W2811116736C190719290 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConceptScore W2811116736C192562407 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConceptScore W2811116736C199343813 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConceptScore W2811116736C2776684213 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConceptScore W2811116736C2910996203 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConceptScore W2811116736C41008148 @default.
• W2811116736 hasConceptScore W2811116736C71924100 @default.
• W2811116736 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2811116736 hasLocation W28111167361 @default.
• W2811116736 hasLocation W28111167362 @default.
• W2811116736 hasOpenAccess W2811116736 @default.
• W2811116736 hasPrimaryLocation W28111167361 @default.
• W2811116736 hasRelatedWork W1658435102 @default.
• W2811116736 hasRelatedWork W2066769440 @default.
• W2811116736 hasRelatedWork W2141867881 @default.
• W2811116736 hasRelatedWork W2263123330 @default.
• W2811116736 hasRelatedWork W2367504662 @default.
• W2811116736 hasRelatedWork W2512199359 @default.
• W2811116736 hasRelatedWork W2977760580 @default.
• W2811116736 hasRelatedWork W2990863651 @default.
• W2811116736 hasRelatedWork W3205332668 @default.
• W2811116736 hasRelatedWork W4285008980 @default.
• W2811116736 hasVolume "120" @default.
• W2811116736 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2811116736 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2811116736 magId "2811116736" @default.
• W2811116736 workType "article" @default.