FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2811189936> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2811189936 abstract "AIM : The aim of this cross-sectional study was to compare the prevalence of apical periodontitis and endodontic treatment between patients with type 2 diabetes and those without diabetes.MATERIALS AND METHODS : 40 diabetics and 80 non diabetics (age and sex matched), with ages ranging from 40 to 65 years, who were attending the oral medicine department for routine dental care, were included in the study. All the subjects in both the groups, underwent a digital panoramic radiograph of the jaws to evaluate the periapical and endodontic status. Grossly decayed teeth were considered as absent, patients with total number of teeth less than 14 were excluded and the third molars were also excluded. Periapical index (PAI) score was used to assess the periapical status. A score greater than 2 (PAI ≥3) was considered to be a sign of periapical pathology. Four observers who were blinded, assessed the radiographs independently and the true mean score was calculated. The prevalence of apical periodontitis in root canal treated and untreated teeth, between both the groups were compared and tabulated. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were measured in diabetics to assess their glycemic control. An attempt was made to find out if the level of glycemic control had any effect on the prevalence of apical periodontitis. Random blood sugar (RBS) levels were measured for the non diabetic group, to pick up undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. Data were statistically analyzed to evaluate the significance in the differences between both the groups. Wilcoxon signed rank test and Mc Nemar tests were used when the individual was the unit of analysis, whereas the chi – square test with Yates correction was used when the tooth was the unit of analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered as significant.RESULTS : There was a higher prevalence of apical periodontitis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetics also had a higher prevalence of apical periodontitis in the root canal treated teeth. Diabetics with good glycemic control had a lesser incidence of acquiring apical periodontitis.CONCLUSION : Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that apical periodontitis was significantly more prevalent in teeth from type 2 diabetic individuals. Diabetics also have a higher chance of apical periodontitis in root canal treated teeth. Diabetics with good glycemic control have a lower risk of acquiring apical periodontitis." @default.
• W2811189936 created "2018-07-10" @default.
• W2811189936 creator A5068433567 @default.
• W2811189936 date "2016-04-01" @default.
• W2811189936 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2811189936 title "Comparison of Periapical Status and Endodontic Treatment between Type 2 Diabetic and Non Diabetic Individuals: An In Vivo study" @default.
• W2811189936 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2811189936 type Work @default.
• W2811189936 sameAs 2811189936 @default.
• W2811189936 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2811189936 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W2811189936 hasAuthorship W2811189936A5068433567 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConcept C2777109110 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConcept C2777180221 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConcept C2777538456 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConcept C2779747767 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConcept C2779847468 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConcept C2780385504 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConcept C2780473172 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConcept C555293320 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConceptScore W2811189936C134018914 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConceptScore W2811189936C199343813 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConceptScore W2811189936C202271784 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConceptScore W2811189936C2777109110 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConceptScore W2811189936C2777180221 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConceptScore W2811189936C2777538456 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConceptScore W2811189936C2779747767 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConceptScore W2811189936C2779847468 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConceptScore W2811189936C2780385504 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConceptScore W2811189936C2780473172 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConceptScore W2811189936C555293320 @default.
• W2811189936 hasConceptScore W2811189936C71924100 @default.
• W2811189936 hasLocation W28111899361 @default.
• W2811189936 hasOpenAccess W2811189936 @default.
• W2811189936 hasPrimaryLocation W28111899361 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W1998673468 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W2048156663 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W2053778528 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W2061549422 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W2070079664 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W2081322220 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W2107025726 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W2109294976 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W2169684278 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W2377737072 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W2599348538 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W2743341142 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W2936245299 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W2964422468 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W2992831587 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W3008492007 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W3010602756 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W3091512914 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W3200184004 @default.
• W2811189936 hasRelatedWork W75030611 @default.
• W2811189936 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2811189936 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2811189936 magId "2811189936" @default.
• W2811189936 workType "dissertation" @default.