FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2811268052> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2811268052 endingPage "683" @default.
• W2811268052 startingPage "679" @default.
• W2811268052 abstract "As it is mentioned in the literature, rates of complications and revision are higher in the obese compared to non-obese patients, although obesity does not a contraindication for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and successful outcomes are achieved. However, there is not any study in the literature comparing the outcomes of fixed and mobile unicompartmental prostheses which are applied in the obese patients. Objective of this study was to compare outcomes of our obese patients who we applied fixed or mobile unicompartmental arthroplasty and followed up for 8 years and over. Of 293 patients in whom we performed unicompartmental knee prosthesis due to medial gonarthrosis between 2003 and 2014, 239 patients who were regularly followed-up at least for 18 months were included in this study. Total 248 knees with 193 (77.8%) fixed including bilateral prosthesis in 9 patients and 55 (22.2%) mobile prostheses were retrospectively assessed. The study included 57 patients having BMI >30 kg/ m2 who were regularly followed-up. In the final controls; mean flexion was found as 107° (100-128°)(p<0.05), mean extension as 3° (0-5°) and mean tibio femoral angle as 4° (1-5°) (p<0.05) valgus. Postoperative mean WOMAC value was found as 91.23 ± 3.02 (92-96) (p<0.05) and mean KSS score as 88.3 ± 3.94 (85-100) (p<0.05). In the final controls, respective knee flexions were seen to be 105° (100- 125°) and 108°(105-128°) in the fixed and mobile insert subgroups (p>0.05). Unicompartmental knee prosthesis is a good treatment option which can be applied also in obese patients and has high survival rates. No significant difference was found between the prostheses with fixed and mobile insert in terms of function and knee scores. However, fixed unicompartmental prosthesis should primarily be preferred in obese patients because of the challenging surgical technique, difficult learning curve and insert dislocation that we encounter with mobile prostheses." @default.
• W2811268052 created "2018-07-10" @default.
• W2811268052 creator A5025605951 @default.
• W2811268052 creator A5032366398 @default.
• W2811268052 creator A5062502256 @default.
• W2811268052 creator A5071856557 @default.
• W2811268052 creator A5084413150 @default.
• W2811268052 date "2017-12-01" @default.
• W2811268052 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2811268052 title "Which Unicondylar Prosthesis Is Better In The Mid-Term In Obese Patients : Fixed Or Mobile?" @default.
• W2811268052 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30840566" @default.
• W2811268052 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2811268052 type Work @default.
• W2811268052 sameAs 2811268052 @default.
• W2811268052 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2811268052 countsByYear W28112680522022 @default.
• W2811268052 countsByYear W28112680522023 @default.
• W2811268052 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2811268052 hasAuthorship W2811268052A5025605951 @default.
• W2811268052 hasAuthorship W2811268052A5032366398 @default.
• W2811268052 hasAuthorship W2811268052A5062502256 @default.
• W2811268052 hasAuthorship W2811268052A5071856557 @default.
• W2811268052 hasAuthorship W2811268052A5084413150 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConcept C2776164576 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConcept C2776494729 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConcept C2778715743 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConcept C2778829800 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConcept C2779286237 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConcept C2781017183 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConceptScore W2811268052C141071460 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConceptScore W2811268052C142724271 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConceptScore W2811268052C204787440 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConceptScore W2811268052C2776164576 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConceptScore W2811268052C2776494729 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConceptScore W2811268052C2778715743 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConceptScore W2811268052C2778829800 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConceptScore W2811268052C2779286237 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConceptScore W2811268052C2781017183 @default.
• W2811268052 hasConceptScore W2811268052C71924100 @default.
• W2811268052 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2811268052 hasLocation W28112680521 @default.
• W2811268052 hasOpenAccess W2811268052 @default.
• W2811268052 hasPrimaryLocation W28112680521 @default.
• W2811268052 hasRelatedWork W1970503174 @default.
• W2811268052 hasRelatedWork W1993640358 @default.
• W2811268052 hasRelatedWork W2090579755 @default.
• W2811268052 hasRelatedWork W2403396587 @default.
• W2811268052 hasRelatedWork W2436819476 @default.
• W2811268052 hasRelatedWork W2553369514 @default.
• W2811268052 hasRelatedWork W2799435176 @default.
• W2811268052 hasRelatedWork W2811268052 @default.
• W2811268052 hasRelatedWork W2997180610 @default.
• W2811268052 hasRelatedWork W3032639619 @default.
• W2811268052 hasVolume "83" @default.
• W2811268052 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2811268052 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2811268052 magId "2811268052" @default.
• W2811268052 workType "article" @default.