FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W284096102> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W284096102 startingPage "459" @default.
• W284096102 abstract "the face of economic espionage by our competitors, and with a large and effective American intelligence apparatus available, some are pondering the previously unthinkable: spying on our friends and allies for the sake of U.S. industry.(1) Intelligence officials the United States estimate that at least twenty foreign nations are currently engaged intelligence activities detrimental to our economic interests. . .(2) Some of thes nations are historic enemies of the United States, some are friends, and still others are members of America's inner circle of world allies.(3) The White House Office on Science and Technology estimates losses to U.S. businesses from foreign economic espionage at nearly one hundred billion dollars per year.(4) In this lucrative covert war on American business, many of our friends and most trusted allies are literally robbing us blind.(5) In the United States, economic espionage has become in some ways the hottest current topic intelligence policy issues.(6) After nearly five decades of guarding the United States against Soviet aggression and the spread of world communism, America's victory the Cold War has spawned hard times for the U.S. intelligence community. Facing the prospect of drastic budget cuts(7) and fending off calls for disbanding or drastically downsizing the CIA,(8) many believe the CIA and other U.S. intelligence organizations must find a new role. A Bush Administration national security review highlighting the increased importance of international economic affairs(9) has helped to spark the current debate surrounding the use of the CIA and other intelligence organizations for economic and this debate recently has grown more urgent. Some influential politicians, including Senator Dennis DeConcini, former Senator David Boren, former Congressman Dan Glickman, and former CIA, Director Stansfield Turner, among others, believe that the intelligence community should assume at least some economic espionage functions to help secure the nation's global power.(10) However, many American business executives oppose government intervention, arguing that they do not need the assistance of the intelligence community to remain competitive.(11) Still other business leaders and senior CIA, officials believe that governmental assistance to U.S. businesses should be limited to increased counterintelligence efforts.(12) While all sides jockey for power, James Woolsey, who recently stepped down as Director of the CIA, retained as official CIA policy the position advocated by his predecessor, Robert Gates: the United States does not, should not, and will not engage industrial espionage.(13) While senior intelligence officials support giving businesses information on economic trends and providing stronger counterintelligence to help targeted U.S. companies, at least publicly they are extremely reluctant to get the CIA into the business of industrial espionage, which Woolsey warned is fraught with complexities, legal difficulties [and] foreign policy difficulties.(14) The reluctance of those within the intelligence community to undertake economic espionage is best illustrated by the statement of one former National Security Council (NSC) staffer: I will break and enter for my country, but I'm not going to do it for Kmart or Citicorp.(15) While support within the intelligence community for economic espionage is weak, pressure from influential politicians on Capitol Hill has led the Clinton Administration to conduct a thorough review of the CIA's economic intelligence policy.(16) Part II of this Note will analyze the legal complexities surrounding the use of government intelligence organizations for economic espionage activities benefiting U.S. businesses. Part III will explore some detail the economic espionage activities allegedly perpetrated by some of the United States' closest economic and military allies against U.S. businesses. …" @default.
• W284096102 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W284096102 creator A5017311302 @default.
• W284096102 date "1995-01-01" @default.
• W284096102 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W284096102 title "From Goldfinger to Butterfinger: The Legal and Policy Issues Surrounding Proposals to Use the CIA for Economic Espionage" @default.
• W284096102 hasPublicationYear "1995" @default.
• W284096102 type Work @default.
• W284096102 sameAs 284096102 @default.
• W284096102 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W284096102 countsByYear W2840961022014 @default.
• W284096102 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W284096102 hasAuthorship W284096102A5017311302 @default.
• W284096102 hasConcept C138921699 @default.
• W284096102 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W284096102 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W284096102 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W284096102 hasConcept C2779220109 @default.
• W284096102 hasConcept C528167355 @default.
• W284096102 hasConcept C542948173 @default.
• W284096102 hasConcept C558872910 @default.
• W284096102 hasConcept C93377909 @default.
• W284096102 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W284096102 hasConcept C99712631 @default.
• W284096102 hasConceptScore W284096102C138921699 @default.
• W284096102 hasConceptScore W284096102C162324750 @default.
• W284096102 hasConceptScore W284096102C17744445 @default.
• W284096102 hasConceptScore W284096102C199539241 @default.
• W284096102 hasConceptScore W284096102C2779220109 @default.
• W284096102 hasConceptScore W284096102C528167355 @default.
• W284096102 hasConceptScore W284096102C542948173 @default.
• W284096102 hasConceptScore W284096102C558872910 @default.
• W284096102 hasConceptScore W284096102C93377909 @default.
• W284096102 hasConceptScore W284096102C94625758 @default.
• W284096102 hasConceptScore W284096102C99712631 @default.
• W284096102 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W284096102 hasLocation W2840961021 @default.
• W284096102 hasOpenAccess W284096102 @default.
• W284096102 hasPrimaryLocation W2840961021 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W142490849 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W1500597594 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W1509454901 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W1698389600 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W190561823 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W1996955541 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W201975697 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W2039682337 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W2135650187 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W2505503145 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W2625109480 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W2911571378 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W295600841 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W2992964020 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W299858034 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W426000302 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W644169283 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W65956103 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W213056225 @default.
• W284096102 hasRelatedWork W36087827 @default.
• W284096102 hasVolume "26" @default.
• W284096102 isParatext "false" @default.
• W284096102 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W284096102 magId "284096102" @default.
• W284096102 workType "article" @default.