FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W285340554> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W285340554 endingPage "24" @default.
• W285340554 startingPage "22" @default.
• W285340554 abstract "One of the continual challenges of college teaching and learning is that students must adapt to academic demands that differ from high school. Students say: studied hard, but didn't get it! and professors grumble: Why don't they get it! This study compared the learning and study strategies college students used in a course with the learning and study strategies their professors believe to be most important for success in the course. The learning strategies investigated here derive from an extensive body of cognitive research that indicates different ways in which students learn affect the quality of their learning and long-term intellectual growth. There are different types of learning demands upon college students. Some academic tasks require recall of specific terms or facts. Rehearsal is a study strategy for learning discrete information. Elaboration helps students build connections between ideas by stressing connections between the ideas already known and their currently learning experience. Organization accomplishes this through study strategies such as clustering, outlining, and distinguishing between the main ideas and supporting ideas in a text or lecture. Two additional learning strategies identified and assessed in the current study were peer learning and seeking help. The study was conducted after fall midterms, with 501 freshman and upper class undergraduates from a private university with a total enrollment of 1500 students. Gender was approximately balanced within each class. Freshman responded to the Motivated Strategies for Learning (MSLQ) questionnaire in freshman seminar courses that deal with diverse topics (but share some common learning objectives). Upper class courses also represented a wide range of academic disciplines. The MSLQ is a self-report instrument that has been used extensively in previous research that investigated college student motivation and learning strategies (Pintrich, McKeachie and Smith, 1989; Pintrich, 1988, 1989; Pintfich & Garcia, 1991; and Pintrich and DeGroot, 1990). Students respond to a seven-point scale with the extremes marked by not at all true of me or very true of me. For example, one item is: When I become confused about something for this class, I go back and try to figure it out. All of the items direct the respondent to the course in which they receive the survey. The MSLQ is scored as separate scales, each sensitive to different aspects of motivation, learning strategies or resource management. A survey asked faculty to rate the extent to which rehearsal, elaboration, organization, critical thinking, peer learning, and help seeking were required to do well in their course. The results clearly indicated considerable discrepancies between the learning strategies faculty believe as important in their courses and the strategies that students report using in the course. Combining freshman and upper level student scores showed the students believed rehearsal to be more important than what faculty judged as important. However, faculty judged elaboration, organization, critical thinking, peer helping, and seeking help more important for success in their courses than the students. The discrepancy was greatest for the cognitive strategies associated with deeper processing: elaboration, organization and critical thinking. Comparisons within either the freshman class or the upper class students showed a similar pattern, with freshman having a greater underestimation of the need for critical thinking and seeking help with their peers than their more experienced peers. …" @default.
• W285340554 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W285340554 creator A5038997437 @default.
• W285340554 date "2007-03-01" @default.
• W285340554 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W285340554 title "I've Studied so Hard for This Course, but Don't Get It! Differences between Student and Faculty Perceptions." @default.
• W285340554 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W285340554 type Work @default.
• W285340554 sameAs 285340554 @default.
• W285340554 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W285340554 countsByYear W2853405542012 @default.
• W285340554 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W285340554 hasAuthorship W285340554A5038997437 @default.
• W285340554 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W285340554 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W285340554 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W285340554 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W285340554 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W285340554 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W285340554 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W285340554 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W285340554 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W285340554 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W285340554 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W285340554 hasConcept C2777212361 @default.
• W285340554 hasConcept C2777776026 @default.
• W285340554 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W285340554 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W285340554 hasConcept C51672120 @default.
• W285340554 hasConcept C77967617 @default.
• W285340554 hasConcept C88610354 @default.
• W285340554 hasConceptScore W285340554C111472728 @default.
• W285340554 hasConceptScore W285340554C120912362 @default.
• W285340554 hasConceptScore W285340554C138885662 @default.
• W285340554 hasConceptScore W285340554C145420912 @default.
• W285340554 hasConceptScore W285340554C154945302 @default.
• W285340554 hasConceptScore W285340554C15744967 @default.
• W285340554 hasConceptScore W285340554C169760540 @default.
• W285340554 hasConceptScore W285340554C17744445 @default.
• W285340554 hasConceptScore W285340554C19417346 @default.
• W285340554 hasConceptScore W285340554C199539241 @default.
• W285340554 hasConceptScore W285340554C26760741 @default.
• W285340554 hasConceptScore W285340554C2777212361 @default.
• W285340554 hasConceptScore W285340554C2777776026 @default.
• W285340554 hasConceptScore W285340554C2779530757 @default.
• W285340554 hasConceptScore W285340554C41008148 @default.
• W285340554 hasConceptScore W285340554C51672120 @default.
• W285340554 hasConceptScore W285340554C77967617 @default.
• W285340554 hasConceptScore W285340554C88610354 @default.
• W285340554 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W285340554 hasLocation W2853405541 @default.
• W285340554 hasOpenAccess W285340554 @default.
• W285340554 hasPrimaryLocation W2853405541 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W104013224 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W111722801 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W112993819 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W15372373 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W1550506019 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W1581844246 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W1600541183 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W2014656810 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W2052708513 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W2054838465 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W2124343331 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W2598677783 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W2993898242 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W2994109260 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W41214611 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W59640634 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W7139202 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W807943793 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W848266979 @default.
• W285340554 hasRelatedWork W86890775 @default.
• W285340554 hasVolume "41" @default.
• W285340554 isParatext "false" @default.
• W285340554 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W285340554 magId "285340554" @default.
• W285340554 workType "article" @default.