Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W286111377> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 84 of
84
with 100 items per page.
- W286111377 startingPage "296" @default.
- W286111377 abstract "WITH THE advent over the past quarter century of global settlements of mass torts, the rule American Bar Association Model Rule of Professional Conduct 1.8(g)--has come to play an increasingly central role in the calculus of counsel for plaintiff's and defendants alike. (1) Oddly, however, the term aggregate settlement has never been defined in the rule, its predecessors or its accompanying comments. The absence of a definition is not merely academic. Because ABA Model Rule 1.8(g) and its state cotinterparts (2) impose very strict disclosure obligations, failure to follow the rule raises the specter that the involved will be unenforceable and creates the risk of a wide variety of other serious consequences to claimants' counsel that may effectively impede their willingness to entertain collective resolutions. (3) Given the severity of the rule's obligations and the attendant consequences if unmet, the absence of a definition creates significant practical uncertainty about when the rule does and does not apply. This definitional uncertainty becomes very real in an era when 'group conferences and multi-case mediations frequently put more than one case on the proverbial negotiating table at the same time. This article will examine three facets of the rule. First, the rule and attempts at an accompanying definition are surveyed. Second, the practical effects of the lack of a definition are discussed. Third, practical solutions from the defense perspective are offered to address the uncertainty arising from the absence of a clear definition. I. The Aggregate Settlement Role and Attempts at a Definition ABA Model Rule 1.8(g) currently reads: A lawyer who represents two or more clients shall not participate in making an of the claims of or against the clients, or in a criminal case an aggregated agreement as to guilty or nolo contendere pleas, unless each client gives informed consent, in a writing signed by the client. The lawyer's disclosure shall include the existence and nature of all the claims or pleas involved and of the participation of each person in the settlement. The rule reached its present form as a part of the general Ethics 2000 amendments to the ABA Model Rules adopted by the ABA House of Delegates in 2002. (4) A comment addressing the rule was added to Model Rule 1.8 at that same time: Aggregate Settlements [13] Differences in willingness to make or accept an offer of are among the risks of common representation of multiple clients by a single lawyer. Under Rule 1.7, this is one of the risks that should be discussed before undertaking the representation, as part of the process of obtaining the clients' informed consent. In addition, Rule 1.2(a) protects each client's right to have the final say in deciding whether to accept or reject an offer of and in deciding whether to enter a guilty or nolo contendere plea in a criminal case. The rule stated in this paragraph is a corollary of both these Rules and provides that, before any offer or plea bargain is made or accepted on behalf of multiple clients, the lawyer must inform each of them about all the material terms of the settlement, including what the other clients will receive or pay if the or plea offer is accepted. See also Rule 1.0(e) (definition of informed consent). Lawyers representing a class of plaintiffs or defendants, or those proceeding derivatively, may not have a full client-lawyer relationship with each member of the class; nevertheless, such lawyers must comply with applicable rules regulating notification of class members and other procedural requirements designed to ensure adequate protection of the entire class. …" @default.
- W286111377 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W286111377 creator A5085953783 @default.
- W286111377 date "2011-07-01" @default.
- W286111377 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W286111377 title "The Aggregate Settlement Rule: A Rule in Search of a Definition" @default.
- W286111377 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
- W286111377 type Work @default.
- W286111377 sameAs 286111377 @default.
- W286111377 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W286111377 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W286111377 hasAuthorship W286111377A5085953783 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C136197465 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C145097563 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C16678853 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C199776023 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C2776805699 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C2776847301 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C2777063073 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C80964368 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W286111377 hasConcept C97460637 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C10138342 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C136197465 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C144024400 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C145097563 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C154945302 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C162324750 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C16678853 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C166957645 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C17744445 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C190253527 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C199539241 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C199776023 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C2776805699 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C2776847301 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C2777063073 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C2778272461 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C41008148 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C80964368 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C94625758 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C95457728 @default.
- W286111377 hasConceptScore W286111377C97460637 @default.
- W286111377 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W286111377 hasLocation W2861113771 @default.
- W286111377 hasOpenAccess W286111377 @default.
- W286111377 hasPrimaryLocation W2861113771 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W144445456 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W1495228596 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W1509027228 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W2067398779 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W2172442054 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W2208429673 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W2260815974 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W2261541206 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W249832399 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W2512638185 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W258597523 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W2912103245 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W3121628088 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W3122027555 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W312387252 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W3126035145 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W49810601 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W85644190 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W192850271 @default.
- W286111377 hasRelatedWork W2741340292 @default.
- W286111377 hasVolume "78" @default.
- W286111377 isParatext "false" @default.
- W286111377 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W286111377 magId "286111377" @default.
- W286111377 workType "article" @default.