FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W286217565> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W286217565 startingPage "1075" @default.
• W286217565 abstract "King Solomon had it made; one threat to dismember a child (which litigants in ancient times apparently took rather seriously) resolved competing parental interests. (1) No doubt today's judges, presiding over relocation disputes, wish their jobs could be that easy. By its very nature, relocation cannot be solved by threats or even negotiation. An unemployed custodial parent New York who finally finds lucrative employment in California cannot be placated with a proposal to live in Chicago just because it is a mid-way point. In a mobile society--with cross-country and even international relocations being prompted by changing economic circumstances, family needs, remarriage, or health concerns--relocation requests are inevitable. We expect our judges to display Solomon-like wisdom in dispensing justice but despite Herculean efforts to serve the best interests of the children inevitably bear the brunt of any forced separation a loving parent. And psychological studies confirm that the younger the child, the more devastating the consequences. (2) A study conducted on 1,619 children between the ages of four and six entering [the] Rochester City School District kindergarten classrooms concluded that separating children from one or both parents before beginning kindergarten can increase the [child's] risk for learning difficulties. (3) The study, led by Sandy Jee, M.D., M.P.H., assistant professor of Pediatrics at the University of Rochester Medical Center's Golisano Children's Hospital, concluded that divorce, illness, violence, and other situations that cause temporary or permanent separations [even one parent are reliable] predictors of which children may require special education interventions. (4) Today, if the relocating parent can establish some lack of interest or involvement by the noncustodial parent, combined with a demonstration that the move is genuinely necessary and will enhance the child's lifestyle in some manner, the courts tend to permit the relocation. (5) For example, in Englese v. Strauss, the Second Department recently permitted a custodial father to relocate to North Carolina with his two children and post-divorce family to open a restaurant with his parents, even though the father made no documentary showing of compelling economic circumstances to support the move. (6) Although the mother's relationship with her older child was strained because he disliked his mother's fiance, the decision was curiously silent as to the impact of the relocation on the younger child. (7) I. THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROTOCOL New York's current relocation decisions reflect guidelines that evolved during the fourteen year period between 1982 and 1996. Prior to 1996, a New York parent seeking to relocate with a child was obliged to demonstrate the existence of 'exceptional circumstances' to justify the proposed move. (8) The 1981 Court of Appeals' decision in Weiss v. Weiss, declaring visitation the joint of the noncustodial parent and the child, made clear that a parent would not be permitted to relocate absent exceptional circumstances, such as those in which it would be inimical to the welfare of the child or where a parent.., forfeited his or her right to such access. (9) In the years following Weiss, a relocating parent bore a heavy burden to prove exceptional circumstances. By and large, permission to relocate was limited to situations in which the custodial parent fled to escape domestic violence (10) or situations in which the noncustodial parent (most often the father) consistently failed to exercise his visitation and/or substantially neglected his obligation to remain current in child support payments. (11) As a general rule, where both parents were caring and fit custodians involved in their children's lives, a request to relocate to join a new spouse or pursue more lucrative employment was denied. (12) In Lavelle v. …" @default.
• W286217565 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W286217565 creator A5006635305 @default.
• W286217565 date "2011-12-22" @default.
• W286217565 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W286217565 title "The Relocation Dilemma: In Search of Best Interests" @default.
• W286217565 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W286217565 type Work @default.
• W286217565 sameAs 286217565 @default.
• W286217565 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W286217565 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W286217565 hasAuthorship W286217565A5006635305 @default.
• W286217565 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W286217565 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W286217565 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W286217565 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W286217565 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W286217565 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W286217565 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W286217565 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W286217565 hasConcept C199776023 @default.
• W286217565 hasConcept C2778496695 @default.
• W286217565 hasConcept C2779019381 @default.
• W286217565 hasConcept C2780687493 @default.
• W286217565 hasConcept C2781216213 @default.
• W286217565 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W286217565 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W286217565 hasConceptScore W286217565C111472728 @default.
• W286217565 hasConceptScore W286217565C138885662 @default.
• W286217565 hasConceptScore W286217565C139621336 @default.
• W286217565 hasConceptScore W286217565C144024400 @default.
• W286217565 hasConceptScore W286217565C15744967 @default.
• W286217565 hasConceptScore W286217565C17744445 @default.
• W286217565 hasConceptScore W286217565C199360897 @default.
• W286217565 hasConceptScore W286217565C199539241 @default.
• W286217565 hasConceptScore W286217565C199776023 @default.
• W286217565 hasConceptScore W286217565C2778496695 @default.
• W286217565 hasConceptScore W286217565C2779019381 @default.
• W286217565 hasConceptScore W286217565C2780687493 @default.
• W286217565 hasConceptScore W286217565C2781216213 @default.
• W286217565 hasConceptScore W286217565C41008148 @default.
• W286217565 hasConceptScore W286217565C73484699 @default.
• W286217565 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W286217565 hasLocation W2862175651 @default.
• W286217565 hasOpenAccess W286217565 @default.
• W286217565 hasPrimaryLocation W2862175651 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W1505034006 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W1505083263 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W201391 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W2035304587 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W2040416882 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W2261521298 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W2264030793 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W2285542880 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W2303668166 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W2344231379 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W2479732859 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W2492291173 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W254293485 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W2993213200 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W3122801180 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W3123760456 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W3124664808 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W397513195 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W84220534 @default.
• W286217565 hasRelatedWork W2768585808 @default.
• W286217565 hasVolume "75" @default.
• W286217565 isParatext "false" @default.
• W286217565 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W286217565 magId "286217565" @default.
• W286217565 workType "article" @default.