Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W286287624> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W286287624 startingPage "103" @default.
- W286287624 abstract "Background: This review aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) as compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). Methods: A literature search for studies comparing the feasibility and safety of SILC with CLC was performed. Perioperative complications, postoperative pain, cosmetic satisfaction, conversion rates operative time, length of stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), total incision length, time to return to work / normal activity, and cost of stay were extracted. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Results: Forty-three studies, including 2291 cases for SILC and 2281 cases for CLC, were included. Our analysis showed that compared with CLC, SILC was associated with significantly reduced postoperative pain on the day of surgery (WMD, -0.47; p = 0.005), lower rate of analgesic use (26.5% vs. 36.1%; p = 0.004), better cosmetic satisfaction scores (WMD, 0.84; p = 0.0006), shorter LOS (WMD, -0.18d; p = 0.03), and shorter incision length (WMD, -9.67 mm; p = 0.004). However, SILC was associated with significantly longer operative time compared to CLC (WMD, 13.65min; p < 0.00001). No significant differences were observed in perioperative complications, analgesic requirement, conversions to open surgery, EBL, time to return to work / normal activity, or cost of stay. Conclusions: In this analysis, which included the largest number of patients thus far, SILC appeared to be feasible and safe. Whether SILC benefits LOS over CLC remains to be further investigated, as well as cost of stay." @default.
- W286287624 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W286287624 creator A5000732066 @default.
- W286287624 creator A5035236967 @default.
- W286287624 creator A5063913041 @default.
- W286287624 creator A5071884187 @default.
- W286287624 date "2015-01-10" @default.
- W286287624 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W286287624 title "Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" @default.
- W286287624 cites W1542725137 @default.
- W286287624 cites W1554040650 @default.
- W286287624 cites W1602150054 @default.
- W286287624 cites W1963519264 @default.
- W286287624 cites W1964783387 @default.
- W286287624 cites W1965192868 @default.
- W286287624 cites W1969275316 @default.
- W286287624 cites W1973504769 @default.
- W286287624 cites W1974146743 @default.
- W286287624 cites W1979423827 @default.
- W286287624 cites W1982460452 @default.
- W286287624 cites W1984116497 @default.
- W286287624 cites W1984170705 @default.
- W286287624 cites W1986196772 @default.
- W286287624 cites W1986927960 @default.
- W286287624 cites W1991608059 @default.
- W286287624 cites W1997046957 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2005102903 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2005274073 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2008689310 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2010895977 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2012442214 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2014088723 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2023565058 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2024565972 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2025620857 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2025915672 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2028140324 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2032285960 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2038886222 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2039304135 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2045399480 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2047696954 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2049248749 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2051115323 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2057894527 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2058141716 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2063350236 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2070193915 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2072301656 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2080856119 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2085419146 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2094074026 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2095810597 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2096390720 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2096998881 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2099814728 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2099885370 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2112555728 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2113711463 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2125435699 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2130065192 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2132061889 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2143092022 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2147028357 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2166344992 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2167327238 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2319812870 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2323090980 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2327754527 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2327933472 @default.
- W286287624 cites W235306527 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2405624411 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2412115787 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2461469146 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2612891587 @default.
- W286287624 cites W2991792334 @default.
- W286287624 cites W86996277 @default.
- W286287624 cites W95099686 @default.
- W286287624 cites W1922605380 @default.
- W286287624 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W286287624 type Work @default.
- W286287624 sameAs 286287624 @default.
- W286287624 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W286287624 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W286287624 hasAuthorship W286287624A5000732066 @default.
- W286287624 hasAuthorship W286287624A5035236967 @default.
- W286287624 hasAuthorship W286287624A5063913041 @default.
- W286287624 hasAuthorship W286287624A5071884187 @default.
- W286287624 hasConcept C120398109 @default.
- W286287624 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W286287624 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W286287624 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W286287624 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
- W286287624 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
- W286287624 hasConcept C2776641081 @default.
- W286287624 hasConcept C2780820201 @default.
- W286287624 hasConcept C2987287001 @default.
- W286287624 hasConcept C2991743468 @default.
- W286287624 hasConcept C2994102832 @default.