FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W287775889> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W287775889 endingPage "251" @default.
• W287775889 startingPage "227" @default.
• W287775889 abstract "I. Introduction 228II. Protective Orders in Texas 228A. Summary of Texas Statutes 2291. Types of Protective Orders 2292. The Protective Order Process 232B. Enforcing Protective Orders 233III. Bond Conditions 234A. General Bond Conditions 235B. Offense-Specific Bond Conditions 235C. Enforcing Bond Conditions 236IV. Why Protective Orders Should be Used: Process Matters 236A. Dynamics of Family Violence 237B. How Protective Orders Alter the Dynamics of Abusive Relationships 238C. Bond Conditions and the Dynamics of Family or Intimate Partner Violence 2431. Bond Conditions Alone Do Not Address the Dynamics of Family Violence 2442. Enforcement of Bond Conditions Offers Inadequate Protection 2453. Protective Order Hearings Do Not Compromise Trial Strategy 247V. The Legislature Intended that Courts Issue Protective Orders 249VI. Conclusion 250I. IntroductionA law is only as good as the system that delivers on its promises ...The justice system's goal for victims of domestic violence is to protect the community by ending the violence. In Texas, there is a mechanism for the system to deliver on the promised goal for victims of domestic violence: protective orders. However, in most Texas counties, victims are unable to obtain protective orders. In many of those counties, officials choose instead to incorporate no contact provisions into an accused abuser's bond conditions. This practice is problematic and should be avoided because bond conditions are an ineffective substitute for protective orders. A combination of bond conditions and a protective order may provide protection to victims; however, Texas courts should cease issuing bond conditions in lieu of protective orders. This Article explores the differences between protective orders and bond conditions and explains why protective orders provide better protection to victims than bond conditions alone.Courts that issue bond conditions, high bond amounts, or both as a substitute for protective orders base the practice on three faulty premises: (1) that protective orders and bond conditions accomplish the same goal, (2) that bond conditions promote judicial efficiency by avoiding an unnecessary evidentiary hearing, and (3) that a protective order hearing gives the alleged abuser an advantage in criminal proceedings by allowing defense counsel to hear the victim's pretrial testimony. These underlying premises are flawed. Part II of this Article explores the statutory framework and scheme of protective orders in Texas. Part III explores bond conditions, highlighting the reasons why prosecutors and judges prefer entering bond conditions to protective orders. Part IV compares and contrasts the effectiveness of protective orders and bond conditions in protecting victims.II. Protective Orders in TexasFor decades, violence and sexual assault among family members or intimate partners were viewed as private matters not meant to be dealt with by the judicial system.2 Slowly, society has begun to view such violence as unacceptable-a shift that has been accompanied by an increase in political will to intervene in such situations.3 Accordingly, all fifty states have enacted protection order statutes to offer relief to victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.4 In recent years, protection has been afforded to victims of other violent crimes that carry an increased risk of revictimization. …" @default.
• W287775889 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W287775889 creator A5073704272 @default.
• W287775889 creator A5077171300 @default.
• W287775889 date "2013-07-01" @default.
• W287775889 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W287775889 title "No Contest: Why Protective Orders Provide Victims Superior Protection to Bond Conditions" @default.
• W287775889 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W287775889 type Work @default.
• W287775889 sameAs 287775889 @default.
• W287775889 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W287775889 countsByYear W2877758892015 @default.
• W287775889 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W287775889 hasAuthorship W287775889A5073704272 @default.
• W287775889 hasAuthorship W287775889A5077171300 @default.
• W287775889 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W287775889 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W287775889 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
• W287775889 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W287775889 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W287775889 hasConcept C2777582232 @default.
• W287775889 hasConcept C2779777834 @default.
• W287775889 hasConcept C2780262971 @default.
• W287775889 hasConcept C69738904 @default.
• W287775889 hasConcept C83009810 @default.
• W287775889 hasConceptScore W287775889C10138342 @default.
• W287775889 hasConceptScore W287775889C144133560 @default.
• W287775889 hasConceptScore W287775889C17319257 @default.
• W287775889 hasConceptScore W287775889C17744445 @default.
• W287775889 hasConceptScore W287775889C199539241 @default.
• W287775889 hasConceptScore W287775889C2777582232 @default.
• W287775889 hasConceptScore W287775889C2779777834 @default.
• W287775889 hasConceptScore W287775889C2780262971 @default.
• W287775889 hasConceptScore W287775889C69738904 @default.
• W287775889 hasConceptScore W287775889C83009810 @default.
• W287775889 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W287775889 hasLocation W2877758891 @default.
• W287775889 hasOpenAccess W287775889 @default.
• W287775889 hasPrimaryLocation W2877758891 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W115525986 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W1482453147 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W1484673341 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W159703132 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W161416468 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W1811640268 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W1975256982 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W2110667269 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W2284111641 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W2767003740 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W2890803015 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W2946423157 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W3038770792 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W3091791374 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W3121623206 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W3121745156 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W3122145232 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W3125082596 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W3125736061 @default.
• W287775889 hasRelatedWork W75973908 @default.
• W287775889 hasVolume "40" @default.
• W287775889 isParatext "false" @default.
• W287775889 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W287775889 magId "287775889" @default.
• W287775889 workType "article" @default.