FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2883132181> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2883132181 endingPage "106" @default.
• W2883132181 startingPage "98" @default.
• W2883132181 abstract "The article investigates individual problematic aspects of representation of the interests of state economic associations by a prosecutor. The special legal status of the State Concern Ukroboronprom is highlighted. Relevant proposals for legislation improvement were put forward. REFERENCES1. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2014), Zakon Ukrayiny: Pro prokuraturu [The Law of Ukraine: On public prosecution:], Ofitsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny, vol. 87, p. 2471.2. Vasyl’yev H. (1997), Predstavnytstvo prokurorom interesiv derzhavy i hospodaryuyuchykh sub«yektiv v arbitrazhi [Representation by a prosecutor of public interests and the interests of economic entities in arbitration], Pravo Ukrayiny, vol. 9, pp. 43-45.3. Stepanova T. (2003), Problemy podannya pozovnykh zayav ta uchasti prokuroriv u hospodars’komu sudochynstvi [Issues related to the filing of actions and involvement of prosecutors in economic legal proceedings], Pid pry yem nytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo, vol. 12, pp. 12-15.4. Drahan O. (2016), Predstavnytstvo interesiv hromadyanyna ta derzhavy v sudi v umovakh yevropeys’koyi intehratsiyi [Courtroom representation of the interests of citizens and of the state in the context of European integration], Naukovyy chasopys Natsional’noyi akademiyi prokuratury Ukrayiny, vol. 1, pp. 19-25.5. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (1991), Arbitrazhnyy protsesual’nyy kodeks Ukrayiny [Arbitration Procedural Code of Ukraine], Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, vol. 6, p. 56.6. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (1991), Pro prokuraturu: Zakon Ukrayiny [On public prosecution: The Law of Ukraine], Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, vol. 53, p. 793.7. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (1997), Pro vnesennya zmin do Arbitrazhnoho protsesual’noho kodeksu Ukrayiny : Zakon Ukrayiny [On the introduction of changes to the Arbitration Procedural Code of Ukraine: The Law of Ukraine],Ofitsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny, vol. 22, p. 3.8. The Constitutional Court of Ukraine (1999), Rishennya Konstytutsiynoho Sudu Ukrayiny u spravi za konstytutsiynymy podannyamy Vyshchoho arbitrazhnoho sudu Ukrayiny ta Heneral’noyi prokuratury Ukrayiny shchodo ofitsiynoho tlumachennya polozhen’ statti 2 Arbitrazhnoho protsesual’noho kodeksu Ukrayiny (sprava pro predstavnytstvo prokuraturoyu Ukrayiny interesiv derzhavy v arbitrazhnomu sudi) [Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case involving the constitutional petition of the High Arbitration Court of Ukraine and the Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine on the official interpretation of Article 2 of the Arbitration Procedural Code of Ukraine (the case involving the representation by the Ukrainian prosecution of public interests in the court of arbitration)], Ofitsijnyj visnyk Ukrainy, vol. 15. p. 35.9. Kyiv economic court (2016), Rishennya Hospodars’koho sudu m. Kyyeva za pozovom zastupnyka Heneral’noho prokurora Ukrayiny v interesakh derzhavy v osobi Ministerstva enerhetyky ta vuhil’noyi promyslovosti Ukrayiny, der zhavnoho kontsernu Yaderne palyvo do Vseukrayins’koyi hromads’koyi orhanizatsiyi Ukrayins’kyy soyuz promyslovtsiv i pidpryyemtsiv pro usunennya pereshkod u korystuvanni maynom [Decision of Economic Court of Kiev city on a claim of a deputy Prosecutor General in the interest of Ministry of Energy and Coal Industry of Ukraine, state concern Nuclear Fuel to All-Ukrainian Civil Or ga nization Ukrainian Union of Manufacturers and Entrepreneurs on clearing the obstacles of property use], available at: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Re view/59414954 (Accessed 2 October 2016).10. Economic Court of Chernyhovskaya oblast (2015), Rishennya Hospodars’koho sudu Chernihivs’koyi oblasti za pozovom zastupnyka prokurora mista Chernihova v interesakh derzhavy v osobi Ministerstva enerhetyky ta vuhi l’noyi promyslovosti Ukrayiny, derzhavnoho kontsernu Ukrtorf do derzhavnoho pidpryyemstva «Chernihivtorf», tovarystva z obmezhenoyu vidpovidal’nistyu Terma Hrup pro vyznannya nediysnym dohovoru ta dodatkovykh uhod do n’oho [Decision of Economic Court of Chernyhovskaya oblast on a claim of deputy Prosecutor of Chernyhov city in the interest of state, on behalf of Ministry of Energy and Coal Industry of Ukraine, state concern Ukrtorf to the state enterprise Chernyhovtorf, LLC Terma Group on invalidation of the contract and its appendixes], available at: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/47624705 (Accessed 2 October 2016).11. European commission for democracy through law (Venice commission) (2013), Vysnovok shchodo proektu Zakonu Ukrayiny Pro prokuraturu [Conclusion on the Draft Law of Ukraine On Public Prosecution], available at: http://www.pravo.org.ua/files/Criminal%20justice/_.pdf (Accessed 2 October 2016).12. Sydorenko A. Okremi nedoliky novoho Zakonu Ukrayiny Pro prokuraturu [Certain drawbacks of a new law of Ukraine On Public Prosecution], Yurydychna hazeta, vol. 14-15 (460-461), available at: http://yur-gazeta.com/dumka-eksperta/okremi-nedoliki-novogo-zakonuukrayini-pro-prokuraturu.html (Accessed 2 October 2016).13. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2012), Zakon Ukrayiny: Pro osoblyvosti upravlinnya ob''yektamy derzhavnoyi vlasnosti v oboronno-promyslovomu kompleksi [The Law of Ukraine: On the management of public entities in defense industry],Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, vol. 4, p. 23.14. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (2010), Postanova: Pro utvorennya Derzhavnoho kontsernu Ukroboronprom [Resolution: On the establishment of the State Concern Ukroboronprom],Ofitsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny, vol. 1. p. 6.15. District administrative court of Ukraine in Kyiv (2015), Postanova Okruzhnoho administratyvnoho sudu Ukrayiny m. Kyyeva za pozovom Shostkyns’koyi ob``yednanoyi derzhavnoyi podatkovoyi inspektsiyi Holovnoho upravlinnya DFS u Sums’kiy oblasti do Derzhavnoho kontsernu Uk roboronprom pro zvernennya styahnennya podatkovoho borhu [Resolution of the District Administrative Court of Ukraine in Kyiv based on the claim of Shostka United State Tax Inspectorate of the Chief Department of the State Fiscal Service in Sumy Region against the State Concern Ukroboronprom involving the collection of the tax debt.], available at: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/44122450 (Accessed 2 October 2016).16. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2003), Hospodars’kyy kodeks Ukrayiny [Economic Code of Ukraine], Ofitsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny, vol. 11. p. 462.17. Dzhuryns’kyy V.O. (2010), Pravove stanovyshche hospodars’kykh ob«yednan’ v Ukrayini [Legal status of economic associations in Ukraine],Yurinkom Inter, Kyiv, Ukraine.18. Kyiv economic court (2015), Ukhvala hospodars’koho sudu m. Kyyeva za pozovom viys’kovoho prokurora Zaporiz’koho harnizonu Pivdennoho rehionu Ukrayiny v interesakh derzhavy v osobi derzhavnoho kontsernu Ukroboronprom, derzhavnoho pidpryyemstva Zaporiz’ke mashynobudivne konstruktors’ke byuro Prohres imeni akademika O.H. Ivchenka do Ministerstva ekonomichnoho rozvytku i torhivli Ukrayiny pro styahnennya 34 000 000,00 hrn. [Judgement of Kyiv Economic Court involving the claim of the military prosecutor of Zaporizhia Garrison of the Southern region of Ukraine in the interests of the state represented by the State Concern Ukroboronprom, State Enterprise Zaporizhia Machine-Building Design Bureau Progress named after Academician O.H. Ivchenko» agai nst the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine on the collection of UAH 34,000,000.00], available at: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/51040084 (Accessed 2 October 2016).19. Kyiv Economic Court of Appeal (2015), Postanova Kyyivs’koho apelyatsiynoho hospodars’koho sudu Ukrayiny za pozovom Viys’kovoho prokurora Zaporiz’koho harnizonu Pivdennoho rehionu Ukrayiny v interesakh derzhavy v osobi derzhavnoho kontsernu Ukroboronprom ta derzhavnoho pidpryyemstva Zaporiz’ke mashynobudivne konstruktors’ke byuro Prohres imeni akademika O.H. Ivchenka do Ministerstva ekonomichnoho rozvytku i torhivli Ukrayiny pro styahnennya 34 000 000,00 hrn. [Resolution of Kyiv Economic Court of Appeal involving the claim of the military prosecutor of Zaporizhia Garrison of the Southern region of Ukraine in the interests of the state represented by the State Concern Ukroboronprom, State Enterprise Zaporizhia Machine-Building Design Bureau Progress named after Academician O.H. Ivchenko against the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine on the collection of UAH 34,000,000.00], available at: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/53206091 (Accessed 2 October 2016).20. Kapustin M.V. (2012), Ponyattya predstavnytstva prokuraturoyu interesiv lyudyny ta derzhavy v sudi [The notion of courtroom representation of the interests of a person and of the state by prosecution], Aktual’ni problemy derzhavy i prava, vol. 68, pp. 517-524.21. Stefanchuk M.M. (2015), Napryamy vdoskonalennya protsesual’noho statusu prokurora yak sub«yektu realizatsiyi funktsiyi predstavnytstva interesiv hromadyanyna abo derzhavy v sudi [Lines of improving the procedural status of the prosecutor as a subject executing the function of courtroom representation of the interests of citizens or of the state], Naukovyy visnyk Uzhhorods’koho natsional’noho universytetu, vol. 34, pp. 115-121.22. Selivanov M.V. (2016), Uchast’ prokurora v hospodars’komu protsesi [Role of the prosecutor in the economic process], Yurydychna hazeta, vol. 3-4 (501-502), available at: http://arbitis.com/Selivanov-M-V-Uchast-prokurora-ugospodars-komu-procesi-pershi-pidsumki-pislya-zminu-zakonodavstvi-/ (Accessed 2 October 2016).23. Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine (2016), Pro deyaki pytannya zastosuvannya polozhen’ Zakonu Ukrayiny Pro prokuraturu shchodo predstavnytstva prokuraturoyu interesiv derzhavy v hospodars’komu sudi : Informatsiynyy Lyst [On certain issues of the implementation of the Law of Ukraine On Public Prosecution regarding the repre sentation by the prosecution of public interests in the economic court: Information sheet], available at: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0348600-16 (Accessed 2 October 2016).24. Natrus O.P., Turlova Yu.A., Kazak O.A. and other (2016), Predstavnytstvo prokurorom u sudi zakonnykh interesiv derzhavy [Courtroom representation of public interests by the prosecutor], Natsional’na akademiya prokuratury Ukrayiny, Kyiv, Ukraine.25. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (2007), Postanova: Pro utvorennya Derzhavnoho kontsernu Ukrtorf [Resolution: On the establishment of the State Concern Ukrtorf], Ofitsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny, vol. 33. p. 1335.26. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2006), Zakon Ukrayiny: Pro upravlinnya ob''yektamy derzhavnoyi vlasnosti [The Law of Ukraine: On the management of state-owned entities], Ofitsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny, vol. 41, p. 2726." @default.
• W2883132181 created "2018-08-03" @default.
• W2883132181 creator A5001425341 @default.
• W2883132181 date "2016-12-12" @default.
• W2883132181 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2883132181 title "REPRESENTATION OF THE INTERESTS OF STATE ECONOMIC ASSOCIATIONS BY A PROSECUTOR" @default.
• W2883132181 doi "https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2016.03.098" @default.
• W2883132181 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2883132181 type Work @default.
• W2883132181 sameAs 2883132181 @default.
• W2883132181 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2883132181 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2883132181 hasAuthorship W2883132181A5001425341 @default.
• W2883132181 hasBestOaLocation W28831321811 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConcept C2776359362 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConceptScore W2883132181C11413529 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConceptScore W2883132181C144024400 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConceptScore W2883132181C15744967 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConceptScore W2883132181C17744445 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConceptScore W2883132181C190253527 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConceptScore W2883132181C199539241 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConceptScore W2883132181C2776359362 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConceptScore W2883132181C41008148 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConceptScore W2883132181C48103436 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConceptScore W2883132181C73484699 @default.
• W2883132181 hasConceptScore W2883132181C94625758 @default.
• W2883132181 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2883132181 hasLocation W28831321811 @default.
• W2883132181 hasOpenAccess W2883132181 @default.
• W2883132181 hasPrimaryLocation W28831321811 @default.
• W2883132181 hasRelatedWork W2016717044 @default.
• W2883132181 hasRelatedWork W2125078748 @default.
• W2883132181 hasRelatedWork W2164326195 @default.
• W2883132181 hasRelatedWork W2553722051 @default.
• W2883132181 hasRelatedWork W2761907329 @default.
• W2883132181 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2883132181 hasRelatedWork W2977987044 @default.
• W2883132181 hasRelatedWork W3122525960 @default.
• W2883132181 hasRelatedWork W4230525343 @default.
• W2883132181 hasRelatedWork W4234480004 @default.
• W2883132181 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2883132181 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2883132181 magId "2883132181" @default.
• W2883132181 workType "article" @default.