FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2883142302> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2883142302 endingPage "301" @default.
• W2883142302 startingPage "286" @default.
• W2883142302 abstract "Purpose The purpose of this paper is to compare real fabric drape images and virtual fabric drape images created by a commercial software. To achieve an in-depth comparison, actual and virtual drape shape properties were considered under three categories: drape area, number of nodes and shape of folds. The results of this research are expected to be useful to improve the reality and accuracy of fabric and garment. Design/methodology/approach Five different fabrics were selected for this study. Fabrics’ mechanical properties were tested by fabric assurance for simple testing method, while drape properties were measured by a Cusick drape meter. A commercial garment simulation was used to generate virtual fabric drapes. Real fabric drape images and virtual fabric drape images were analyzed by an image analysis software and results were used to calculate drape properties. Regression analysis was performed to compare real fabric drape and virtual fabric drape properties. Findings Differences between real fabric drape and virtual fabric drape were stated clearly. Simulation software was found to be insufficient to reflect drape area. However, simulations were quite successful corresponding to the number of nodes. Only one simulation had +2 nodes than its actual counterpart. This study showed that area and node shape representations of simulation software should be improved while node numbers are sufficiently represented. Research limitations/implications There are alternative 3D garment simulation software available to the fashion business. All these companies are working on to improve their simulation reality and accuracy. Some of them are also offering various equipment to measure the fabric properties. In this study, Optitex 3D Suite was selected as the simulation software due to several reasons as explained in this paper. However, other simulation programs might also be employed to perform virtual fabric drapes. Furthermore, in this study, the drape images of five woven fabrics were compared. The fabric selection was done according to a pre-test and consequently similar fabrics were determined to be the subject of the study. However, the more the number of the fabrics, the better the comparison and eventually the better the assessment of simulation success. Therefore, it is prospected to test more fabrics with versatile fabric properties for further studies. Originality/value Drape shape was observed from three perspectives: drape area, node numbers, and node shapes. Dealing the problem from these perspectives provided an in-depth comparison of real and virtual drapes. In this study, standard deviation of peak angles was used to explain node distribution that is new to the literature to the authors’ knowledge." @default.
• W2883142302 created "2018-08-03" @default.
• W2883142302 creator A5021104437 @default.
• W2883142302 creator A5027504097 @default.
• W2883142302 creator A5051307251 @default.
• W2883142302 date "2018-06-04" @default.
• W2883142302 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W2883142302 title "Comparative analysis of drape characteristics of actually and virtually draped fabrics" @default.
• W2883142302 cites W1489843851 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W1547878825 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W1972698533 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W1974454209 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W1986195864 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W1994415241 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W1997692266 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W1997735725 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2029784168 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2034549475 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2048766932 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2053692010 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2054149642 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2067005955 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2074968321 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2076718969 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2088303766 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2091904480 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2098074291 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2099540110 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2102107100 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2112645639 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2117307048 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2135130076 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2222246464 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2336373142 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2426409821 @default.
• W2883142302 cites W2492332157 @default.
• W2883142302 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcst-06-2017-0085" @default.
• W2883142302 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2883142302 type Work @default.
• W2883142302 sameAs 2883142302 @default.
• W2883142302 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2883142302 countsByYear W28831423022020 @default.
• W2883142302 countsByYear W28831423022021 @default.
• W2883142302 countsByYear W28831423022023 @default.
• W2883142302 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2883142302 hasAuthorship W2883142302A5021104437 @default.
• W2883142302 hasAuthorship W2883142302A5027504097 @default.
• W2883142302 hasAuthorship W2883142302A5051307251 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConcept C121684516 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConcept C194969405 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConcept C199639397 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConcept C2777904410 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConcept C62611344 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConceptScore W2883142302C121684516 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConceptScore W2883142302C127413603 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConceptScore W2883142302C154945302 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConceptScore W2883142302C194969405 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConceptScore W2883142302C199360897 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConceptScore W2883142302C199639397 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConceptScore W2883142302C2777904410 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConceptScore W2883142302C41008148 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConceptScore W2883142302C62611344 @default.
• W2883142302 hasConceptScore W2883142302C66938386 @default.
• W2883142302 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2883142302 hasLocation W28831423021 @default.
• W2883142302 hasOpenAccess W2883142302 @default.
• W2883142302 hasPrimaryLocation W28831423021 @default.
• W2883142302 hasRelatedWork W1485627940 @default.
• W2883142302 hasRelatedWork W1975674005 @default.
• W2883142302 hasRelatedWork W2068185143 @default.
• W2883142302 hasRelatedWork W2347688850 @default.
• W2883142302 hasRelatedWork W2376240513 @default.
• W2883142302 hasRelatedWork W2383650581 @default.
• W2883142302 hasRelatedWork W2385977855 @default.
• W2883142302 hasRelatedWork W2405379563 @default.
• W2883142302 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2883142302 hasRelatedWork W3013959128 @default.
• W2883142302 hasVolume "30" @default.
• W2883142302 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2883142302 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2883142302 magId "2883142302" @default.
• W2883142302 workType "article" @default.