FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2884350024> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2884350024 endingPage "e0201010" @default.
• W2884350024 startingPage "e0201010" @default.
• W2884350024 abstract "Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling during primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) prevents the formation of postoperative macular epiretinal membrane (ERM). However, studies that compared vitrectomy with and without ILM peeling for RRD, have reported controversial outcomes.To assess the efficacy of ILM peeling versus non-ILM peeling during vitrectomy for RRD by a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies.PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Embase databases, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to April 2018 to identify studies that compared primary vitrectomy with and without ILM peeling for RRD with at least six months follow-up. Primary outcomes were the rate of postoperative ERM formation and mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change after vitrectomy. Rate of recurrence of retinal detachment (RD) was assessed as secondary outcome. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) expressed pooled results for rate of ERM formation and rate of RD recurrence in ILM peeling and non-ILM peeling groups. Pooled results for BCVA change in the two groups were expressed as Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) with 95% CIs.Nine studies, one of which was a randomized controlled trial (RCT), with a total number of 404 eyes in the ILM peeling group and 365 eyes in the non-ILM peeling group, were included. The analysis from pooled data indicated a significant lower rate of postoperative ERM formation in the ILM peeling group compared to the non-ILM peeling group (9 studies, 769 eyes, RR = 0.14; CI: 0.07 to 0.28; P < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in mean BCVA change (9 studies, 769 eyes, WMD = 0.02; CI: -0.11 to 0.16; P = 0.75). Rate of recurrence of RD was lower in the ILM peeling group (6 studies, 603 eyes, RR = 0.32; CI = 0.17 to 0.61; P< 0.001).ILM peeling during vitrectomy for RRD prevents the formation of macular epiretinal membrane postoperatively and reduces the incidence of RD recurrence, but better visual outcome was not found compared to non-ILM peeling vitrectomy." @default.
• W2884350024 created "2018-08-03" @default.
• W2884350024 creator A5004087638 @default.
• W2884350024 creator A5025992002 @default.
• W2884350024 creator A5041028484 @default.
• W2884350024 creator A5041881911 @default.
• W2884350024 creator A5057481978 @default.
• W2884350024 creator A5070063314 @default.
• W2884350024 creator A5080069172 @default.
• W2884350024 creator A5087414533 @default.
• W2884350024 creator A5090000646 @default.
• W2884350024 date "2018-07-19" @default.
• W2884350024 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2884350024 title "Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling during primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A systematic review and meta-analysis" @default.
• W2884350024 cites W1968458596 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W1996183587 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2008807399 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2025187912 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2025634542 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2032209720 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2038395000 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2042626411 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2072452212 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2092848460 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2098923148 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2116475791 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2117705296 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2122857558 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2126262673 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2134833483 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2157823046 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2163166732 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2344215512 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2508630435 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2588681363 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2591015134 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2626189127 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2738247878 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2782015858 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2789707698 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2793520922 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2795767923 @default.
• W2884350024 cites W2793613236 @default.
• W2884350024 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201010" @default.
• W2884350024 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6053210" @default.
• W2884350024 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30024983" @default.
• W2884350024 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2884350024 type Work @default.
• W2884350024 sameAs 2884350024 @default.
• W2884350024 citedByCount "31" @default.
• W2884350024 countsByYear W28843500242019 @default.
• W2884350024 countsByYear W28843500242020 @default.
• W2884350024 countsByYear W28843500242021 @default.
• W2884350024 countsByYear W28843500242022 @default.
• W2884350024 countsByYear W28843500242023 @default.
• W2884350024 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2884350024 hasAuthorship W2884350024A5004087638 @default.
• W2884350024 hasAuthorship W2884350024A5025992002 @default.
• W2884350024 hasAuthorship W2884350024A5041028484 @default.
• W2884350024 hasAuthorship W2884350024A5041881911 @default.
• W2884350024 hasAuthorship W2884350024A5057481978 @default.
• W2884350024 hasAuthorship W2884350024A5070063314 @default.
• W2884350024 hasAuthorship W2884350024A5080069172 @default.
• W2884350024 hasAuthorship W2884350024A5087414533 @default.
• W2884350024 hasAuthorship W2884350024A5090000646 @default.
• W2884350024 hasBestOaLocation W28843500241 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConcept C2777344775 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConcept C2780428090 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConcept C2780827179 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConcept C2781242345 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConcept C2781325737 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConceptScore W2884350024C118487528 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConceptScore W2884350024C126322002 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConceptScore W2884350024C141071460 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConceptScore W2884350024C168563851 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConceptScore W2884350024C2776478404 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConceptScore W2884350024C2777344775 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConceptScore W2884350024C2778257484 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConceptScore W2884350024C2780428090 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConceptScore W2884350024C2780827179 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConceptScore W2884350024C2781242345 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConceptScore W2884350024C2781325737 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConceptScore W2884350024C44249647 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConceptScore W2884350024C71924100 @default.
• W2884350024 hasConceptScore W2884350024C95190672 @default.
• W2884350024 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2884350024 hasLocation W28843500241 @default.
• W2884350024 hasLocation W28843500242 @default.
• W2884350024 hasLocation W28843500243 @default.

• next