FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2884396972> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2884396972 endingPage "288" @default.
• W2884396972 startingPage "276" @default.
• W2884396972 abstract "Purpose The ongoing challenge for hospitality firms is not to avoid service failures completely but rather to find effective ways of recovering from them. The purpose of this paper is to adopt conjoint analysis to examine guest preferences for service recovery actions that are taken simultaneously and the effect of such actions in the context of hotels in order to seek answers to the following research questions: what type of compensation bundle is most preferred by guests? and How effective are compensations in terms of recovery satisfaction, especially with regard to subsequent behavioral intentions? Design/methodology/approach In order to study guest preferences for compensation, choice-based conjoint (CBC) experiments were used. The CBC survey method involves presenting respondents with several hypothetical scenarios that include numerous combinations of compensation attributes. The survey sample was recruited through web-based panels run by a marketing firm. The online survey was designed and built in the Sawtooth Software platform. Conjoint analysis was carried out. Findings The conjoint analysis results show that among the different compensation attributes, consumers preferred discounts the most, followed by corrective actions and loyalty points. Among the discount levels, consumers favored “free one night certificate for a future stay” over “100 percent off one night’s room bill.” Regarding loyalty points, consumers desire more points than fewer points. In terms of correction levels, consumers appear to desire an “upgrade to a suite” over just moving to another room or having the original room cleaned. Moreover, consumers prefer that service recovery be handled by upper-level management. Research limitations/implications Several limitations should be discussed. For example, the type of service failure studied was limited to a booked room not being clean upon check-in. Different types and magnitudes of service failures may result in a different set of preferences for compensation bundles. In addition, the compensation attributes and levels were limited in scope even though they were obtained from interviews with managers at midsize hotels. Other attributes and attribute levels can be included in future studies. Originality/value Although an abundant number of studies have been done regarding service failure and recovery, the extent to which service recovery needs to be carried out before it translates into actual recovery remains unanswered. Using conjoint analysis, the study identified exactly which bundle of compensation items was most preferred by guests." @default.
• W2884396972 created "2018-08-03" @default.
• W2884396972 creator A5055980173 @default.
• W2884396972 date "2018-07-17" @default.
• W2884396972 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2884396972 title "Guest preferences for service recovery procedures: conjoint analysis" @default.
• W2884396972 cites W1963804871 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W1971107992 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W1974788803 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W1977044208 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W1983851608 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W1999609852 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2006154058 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2011529020 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2022720617 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2025266568 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2025908688 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2030999202 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2031564884 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2040384293 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2043471081 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2059441062 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2060034681 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2061492065 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2062193161 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2063305741 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2064198781 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2075271355 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2078666525 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2086642814 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2087661106 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2095576256 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2113012605 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2118269528 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2130988245 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2135888648 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2143632657 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2153088094 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2158476549 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2164361990 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2259978233 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2304011664 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W2471646394 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W3121977573 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W3123043178 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W4231536446 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W4233457423 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W4233898295 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W4246909570 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W4255659084 @default.
• W2884396972 cites W4362222420 @default.
• W2884396972 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/jhti-01-2018-0008" @default.
• W2884396972 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2884396972 type Work @default.
• W2884396972 sameAs 2884396972 @default.
• W2884396972 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W2884396972 countsByYear W28843969722018 @default.
• W2884396972 countsByYear W28843969722019 @default.
• W2884396972 countsByYear W28843969722020 @default.
• W2884396972 countsByYear W28843969722021 @default.
• W2884396972 countsByYear W28843969722022 @default.
• W2884396972 countsByYear W28843969722023 @default.
• W2884396972 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2884396972 hasAuthorship W2884396972A5055980173 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C107482638 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C18918823 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C2776967331 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C2778054375 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C2780023022 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C2780378061 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C2781249084 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C525551149 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConceptScore W2884396972C10138342 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConceptScore W2884396972C107482638 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConceptScore W2884396972C144133560 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConceptScore W2884396972C151730666 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConceptScore W2884396972C15744967 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConceptScore W2884396972C162324750 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConceptScore W2884396972C162853370 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConceptScore W2884396972C175444787 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConceptScore W2884396972C17744445 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConceptScore W2884396972C182306322 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConceptScore W2884396972C18918823 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConceptScore W2884396972C199539241 @default.
• W2884396972 hasConceptScore W2884396972C2776967331 @default.

• next