Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2884567266> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 68 of
68
with 100 items per page.
- W2884567266 endingPage "E149" @default.
- W2884567266 startingPage "E144" @default.
- W2884567266 abstract "In Brief Study Design. An experimental laboratory-based biomechanical study. Objective. The objective of this study was to evaluate, in a synthetic bone model, the difference in primary and revision pull-out strength using pedicle screws of different thread designs. Summary of Background Data. Over the past few decades, there has been a growing interest in optimizing the screw pull-out strength using various screw designs (single-thread, mixed-thread, dual-thread). Although primary pull-out strength has been studied previously, little is known about revision pull-out strength of different pedicle screws. Methods. The pull-out strengths of three different pedicle screw designs (single-thread, mixed-thread, dual-thread) were tested in standardized polyurethane foam in three sequences. Sequence 1: A 6.5 mm screw was inserted into the foam block and the primary pull-out strength measured. Sequence 2: A 6.5 mm screw was inserted, removed, and then reinserted into the same foam block. The revision pull-out strength was then measured. Sequence 3: A 6.5 mm screw was inserted, removed and a 7.5-mm screw of the same thread design was reinserted. The revision pull-out strength was then measured. Results. The primary pull-out strength was similar across screw designs, although dual-thread screws showed higher primary pull-out strength (2628.8 N) compared to single-thread screws (2184.4 N, P < 0.05). For revision pull-out strength, the mixed-thread screws had significant reduction in revision pull-out strength of 18.6% (1890.2 N, P = 0.0173). Revision with a larger diameter screw improved the pull-out strength back to baseline. Single and dual-thread screws showed no significant reduction in revision pull-out strength. Conclusion. The dual-threaded screws provided the strongest primary pull-out strength for spinal fixation. The mixed-thread screws, however, had the poorest revision pull-out strength, decreasing by 18.6% compared to other screw designs. In cases in which mixed-threaded screws have to be revised (at the index or revision surgery), surgeons should consider the use of larger diameter screws to improve the pull-out strength. Level of Evidence: 5 This is a biomechanical study evaluating the primary and revision pull-out strength of three different compliance engineered pedicle screws in a synthetic bone model. We have found that the primary and revision pull-out strength is affected by the screw thread design." @default.
- W2884567266 created "2018-08-03" @default.
- W2884567266 creator A5005695797 @default.
- W2884567266 creator A5010486991 @default.
- W2884567266 creator A5027525421 @default.
- W2884567266 creator A5042734284 @default.
- W2884567266 date "2019-02-01" @default.
- W2884567266 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2884567266 title "Pedicle Screw Designs in Spinal Surgery" @default.
- W2884567266 cites W1571901798 @default.
- W2884567266 cites W2002241924 @default.
- W2884567266 cites W2009299486 @default.
- W2884567266 cites W2039389996 @default.
- W2884567266 cites W2050189398 @default.
- W2884567266 cites W2085324874 @default.
- W2884567266 cites W2160855647 @default.
- W2884567266 cites W2467652267 @default.
- W2884567266 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002789" @default.
- W2884567266 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30005047" @default.
- W2884567266 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2884567266 type Work @default.
- W2884567266 sameAs 2884567266 @default.
- W2884567266 citedByCount "16" @default.
- W2884567266 countsByYear W28845672662019 @default.
- W2884567266 countsByYear W28845672662020 @default.
- W2884567266 countsByYear W28845672662021 @default.
- W2884567266 countsByYear W28845672662022 @default.
- W2884567266 countsByYear W28845672662023 @default.
- W2884567266 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2884567266 hasAuthorship W2884567266A5005695797 @default.
- W2884567266 hasAuthorship W2884567266A5010486991 @default.
- W2884567266 hasAuthorship W2884567266A5027525421 @default.
- W2884567266 hasAuthorship W2884567266A5042734284 @default.
- W2884567266 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2884567266 hasConcept C138101251 @default.
- W2884567266 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2884567266 hasConcept C172644405 @default.
- W2884567266 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
- W2884567266 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2884567266 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
- W2884567266 hasConceptScore W2884567266C127413603 @default.
- W2884567266 hasConceptScore W2884567266C138101251 @default.
- W2884567266 hasConceptScore W2884567266C141071460 @default.
- W2884567266 hasConceptScore W2884567266C172644405 @default.
- W2884567266 hasConceptScore W2884567266C29694066 @default.
- W2884567266 hasConceptScore W2884567266C71924100 @default.
- W2884567266 hasConceptScore W2884567266C78519656 @default.
- W2884567266 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2884567266 hasLocation W28845672661 @default.
- W2884567266 hasOpenAccess W2884567266 @default.
- W2884567266 hasPrimaryLocation W28845672661 @default.
- W2884567266 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
- W2884567266 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
- W2884567266 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
- W2884567266 hasRelatedWork W2323456665 @default.
- W2884567266 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
- W2884567266 hasRelatedWork W2391747851 @default.
- W2884567266 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
- W2884567266 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
- W2884567266 hasRelatedWork W166848560 @default.
- W2884567266 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
- W2884567266 hasVolume "44" @default.
- W2884567266 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2884567266 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2884567266 magId "2884567266" @default.
- W2884567266 workType "article" @default.