FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2884715511> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2884715511 endingPage "75" @default.
• W2884715511 startingPage "69" @default.
• W2884715511 abstract "Statement of problem Clinical trials are needed to evaluate digital and conventional technologies for providing fixed partial dentures. Purpose The purpose of the first part of this clinical study was to test whether complete-arch digital scans were similar to or better than complete-arch conventional impressions regarding time efficiency and participant and clinician perceptions. Material and Methods Ten participants in need of a posterior tooth-supported 3-unit fixed partial denture were included. Three intraoral digital scanners and subsequent workflows (Lava C.O.S.; 3M [Lava], iTero; Align Technology Inc [iTero], Cerec Bluecam; Dentsply Sirona [Cerec]) were compared with the conventional impression method using polyether (Permadyne; 3M) and the conventional workflow. A computer-generated randomization list was used to determine the sequence of the tested impression procedures for each participant. The time needed for the impression procedures, including the occlusal registration, was assessed. In addition, the participant and clinician perceptions of the comfort and difficulty of the impression were rated by means of visual analog scales. Data were analyzed with the nonparametric paired Wilcoxon test together with an appropriate Bonferroni correction to detect differences among the impression systems (α=.05). Results The total time for the complete-arch impressions, including the preparation (powdering) and the occlusal registration, was shorter for the conventional impression than for the digital scans (Lava 1091 ±523 seconds, iTero 1313 ±418 seconds, Cerec 1702 ±558 seconds, conventional 658 ±181 seconds). The difference was statistically significant for 2 of the 3 digital scanners (iTero P=.001, Cerec P<.001). The clinicians preferred the conventional impression to the digital scans. Of the scanning systems, the system without the need for powdering was preferred to the systems with powdering. No impression method was clearly preferred over others by the participants. Conclusions For complete-arch impressions, the conventional impression procedures were objectively less time consuming and subjectively preferred by both clinicians and participants over digital scan procedures." @default.
• W2884715511 created "2018-08-03" @default.
• W2884715511 creator A5016244767 @default.
• W2884715511 creator A5031198733 @default.
• W2884715511 creator A5052953612 @default.
• W2884715511 creator A5068615747 @default.
• W2884715511 creator A5086180904 @default.
• W2884715511 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W2884715511 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2884715511 title "Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part I: Time efficiency of complete-arch digital scans versus conventional impressions" @default.
• W2884715511 cites W1491750767 @default.
• W2884715511 cites W1971717191 @default.
• W2884715511 cites W2006738848 @default.
• W2884715511 cites W2064027196 @default.
• W2884715511 cites W2107142492 @default.
• W2884715511 cites W2125247977 @default.
• W2884715511 cites W2401016195 @default.
• W2884715511 cites W2487760717 @default.
• W2884715511 cites W2523526721 @default.
• W2884715511 cites W2567072764 @default.
• W2884715511 cites W2584022492 @default.
• W2884715511 cites W2884160095 @default.
• W2884715511 cites W2899145254 @default.
• W2884715511 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.021" @default.
• W2884715511 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30017152" @default.
• W2884715511 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2884715511 type Work @default.
• W2884715511 sameAs 2884715511 @default.
• W2884715511 citedByCount "28" @default.
• W2884715511 countsByYear W28847155112019 @default.
• W2884715511 countsByYear W28847155112020 @default.
• W2884715511 countsByYear W28847155112021 @default.
• W2884715511 countsByYear W28847155112022 @default.
• W2884715511 countsByYear W28847155112023 @default.
• W2884715511 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2884715511 hasAuthorship W2884715511A5016244767 @default.
• W2884715511 hasAuthorship W2884715511A5031198733 @default.
• W2884715511 hasAuthorship W2884715511A5052953612 @default.
• W2884715511 hasAuthorship W2884715511A5068615747 @default.
• W2884715511 hasAuthorship W2884715511A5086180904 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConcept C12868164 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConcept C134132462 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConcept C206041023 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConcept C2776684213 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConcept C2779890979 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConceptScore W2884715511C126322002 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConceptScore W2884715511C12868164 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConceptScore W2884715511C134132462 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConceptScore W2884715511C136764020 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConceptScore W2884715511C159985019 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConceptScore W2884715511C192562407 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConceptScore W2884715511C199343813 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConceptScore W2884715511C206041023 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConceptScore W2884715511C2776684213 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConceptScore W2884715511C2779890979 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConceptScore W2884715511C29694066 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConceptScore W2884715511C41008148 @default.
• W2884715511 hasConceptScore W2884715511C71924100 @default.
• W2884715511 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2884715511 hasLocation W28847155111 @default.
• W2884715511 hasOpenAccess W2884715511 @default.
• W2884715511 hasPrimaryLocation W28847155111 @default.
• W2884715511 hasRelatedWork W1235273103 @default.
• W2884715511 hasRelatedWork W1578936140 @default.
• W2884715511 hasRelatedWork W2064027196 @default.
• W2884715511 hasRelatedWork W2281600705 @default.
• W2884715511 hasRelatedWork W2551150611 @default.
• W2884715511 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2884715511 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2884715511 hasRelatedWork W2981949184 @default.
• W2884715511 hasRelatedWork W4313242244 @default.
• W2884715511 hasRelatedWork W2502246267 @default.
• W2884715511 hasVolume "121" @default.
• W2884715511 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2884715511 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2884715511 magId "2884715511" @default.
• W2884715511 workType "article" @default.