FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2885293155> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2885293155 endingPage "324" @default.
• W2885293155 startingPage "318" @default.
• W2885293155 abstract "STUDY DESIGN A cross-sectional, mixed methods analysis of sources of expectations of lumbar surgery. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to ascertain sources of expectations and compare them to clinical characteristics. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Understanding where patients obtain expectations of lumbar surgery is necessary in order to develop interventions to foster appropriate expectations. METHODS This was a qualitative-quantitative study of 428 patients interviewed preoperatively with a 20-item validated survey, which asks patients how much improvement they expect per item. Patients then were asked open-ended questions about how they came to have these expectations and, using qualitative analysis, responses were grouped into themes representing different sources of expectations. The likelihood of citing various sources was then assessed with odds ratios (ORs) based on demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS Patients' mean age was 55 years, 80% had degenerative diagnoses and 24% had prior lumbar surgery. Patients volunteered multiple sources; most prevalent were current surgeon (83%), internet resources (55%), social network contacts (26%), other physicians (22%); and previous experience (65%) for the subgroup who had prior lumbar surgery. Patients were more likely to cite their surgeon if they had less disability [OR 2.8, confidence interval (CI) 1.3-5.8, P = 0.007], were treated with conservative care, such as physical therapy (OR 2.7, CI 1.6-4.7, P = 0.0003), and had symptoms for ≤12 months (OR 1.8, CI 1.1-3.0, P = 0.03). Patients who cited the internet were employed (OR 2.2; CI 1.5-3.3; P < 0.0001), were treated with physical therapy (OR 1.9; CI 1.2-3.1; P = 0.006), had a negative screen for depression (OR 1.8; CI 1.2-2.8; P = 0.004), and were younger (OR 1.6; CI 1.1-2.4; P = .02). Patients were less likely to expect complete improvement for most items of the survey if they had prior lumbar surgery (P = 0.002) or other orthopedic surgery (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION Patients derive their expectations of lumbar surgery from multiple sources. Some sources are modifiable through enhanced communication with surgeons and potentially through novel modes of education, such as web-based resources that are specifically designed to address expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2." @default.
• W2885293155 created "2018-08-22" @default.
• W2885293155 creator A5008638908 @default.
• W2885293155 creator A5025789706 @default.
• W2885293155 creator A5041334417 @default.
• W2885293155 creator A5052136583 @default.
• W2885293155 creator A5078096304 @default.
• W2885293155 creator A5085181071 @default.
• W2885293155 creator A5087128983 @default.
• W2885293155 date "2019-03-01" @default.
• W2885293155 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2885293155 title "Sources of Patients’ Expectations of Lumbar Surgery" @default.
• W2885293155 cites W1901687322 @default.
• W2885293155 cites W1994735792 @default.
• W2885293155 cites W1995355804 @default.
• W2885293155 cites W2030430403 @default.
• W2885293155 cites W2039048322 @default.
• W2885293155 cites W2056989464 @default.
• W2885293155 cites W2127610577 @default.
• W2885293155 cites W2133229266 @default.
• W2885293155 cites W2143540592 @default.
• W2885293155 cites W2175502827 @default.
• W2885293155 cites W2218433659 @default.
• W2885293155 cites W2314160607 @default.
• W2885293155 cites W2335969875 @default.
• W2885293155 cites W2530904935 @default.
• W2885293155 cites W2792601250 @default.
• W2885293155 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002830" @default.
• W2885293155 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30086082" @default.
• W2885293155 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2885293155 type Work @default.
• W2885293155 sameAs 2885293155 @default.
• W2885293155 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2885293155 countsByYear W28852931552019 @default.
• W2885293155 countsByYear W28852931552020 @default.
• W2885293155 countsByYear W28852931552021 @default.
• W2885293155 countsByYear W28852931552022 @default.
• W2885293155 countsByYear W28852931552023 @default.
• W2885293155 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2885293155 hasAuthorship W2885293155A5008638908 @default.
• W2885293155 hasAuthorship W2885293155A5025789706 @default.
• W2885293155 hasAuthorship W2885293155A5041334417 @default.
• W2885293155 hasAuthorship W2885293155A5052136583 @default.
• W2885293155 hasAuthorship W2885293155A5078096304 @default.
• W2885293155 hasAuthorship W2885293155A5085181071 @default.
• W2885293155 hasAuthorship W2885293155A5087128983 @default.
• W2885293155 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2885293155 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2885293155 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2885293155 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2885293155 hasConceptScore W2885293155C141071460 @default.
• W2885293155 hasConceptScore W2885293155C44575665 @default.
• W2885293155 hasConceptScore W2885293155C61434518 @default.
• W2885293155 hasConceptScore W2885293155C71924100 @default.
• W2885293155 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2885293155 hasLocation W28852931551 @default.
• W2885293155 hasOpenAccess W2885293155 @default.
• W2885293155 hasPrimaryLocation W28852931551 @default.
• W2885293155 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
• W2885293155 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2885293155 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2885293155 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2885293155 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W2885293155 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W2885293155 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2885293155 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W2885293155 hasRelatedWork W2519357708 @default.
• W2885293155 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2885293155 hasVolume "44" @default.
• W2885293155 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2885293155 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2885293155 magId "2885293155" @default.
• W2885293155 workType "article" @default.