FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2885663668> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2885663668 endingPage "547" @default.
• W2885663668 startingPage "520" @default.
• W2885663668 abstract "The objective of this review was to examine the economic cost of robotic therapy compared to conventional therapy for adult stroke patients, from the perspective of hospitals.It is important to identify appropriate treatment methods that not only reduce the disability experienced by stroke survivors but also do so cost effectively. While robotic devices enable a high-intensity training regime for patients, robotic training equipment involves a significant capital outlay for healthcare providers. Hence, the decision to introduce robotic devices into clinical settings and offer robotic stroke rehabilitation to patients has an important cost consideration for hospitals.This review included rehabilitation trials of adult stroke patients (18 years and older) involving robotic devices and comparing the economic outcomes to control groups that used conventional physiotherapy.We searched major databases such as PubMed, Embase and CINAHL for trial studies conducted from year 2000 and published in English. Included studies were critically appraised, and data were extracted and synthesized using the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI).Five studies with 213 patients were included in this review. Four studies examined upper limb interventions, and one study evaluated both upper limb and lower limb interventions. Of the five studies, two included acute/sub-acute patients and three included chronic patients. The overall methodological quality of the studies was of a moderate level. The included studies compared the cost of providing robotic intervention against the cost of providing conventional therapy in dose-matched therapy sessions and computed the cost measures in terms of cost per patient session or cost per patient. We performed a cost comparison of the various studies and reviewed the data based on two approaches: the dominance ranking framework and the dominance ranking score. By comparing the cost outcome of each study, four of the five studies showed better cost benefits for the robotic intervention group. Under the dominance ranking framework and the dominance ranking score, the overall dominance levels for most sub-groups favored robotic intervention.Our review indicated that robotic therapy had a better economic outcome than conventional therapy. For patients with severe disability from significant stroke, a moderate dominance favoring robotic therapy for health benefit was found, and a strong dominance for robotic therapy for cost benefit was found. However, the limited number of studies in the review required us to view the results with caution. Key sensitivity factors affecting robotic therapy were the number of patients who could be treated per robotic session and the time therapists spent with patients during a robotic session. Robotic therapy could be prescribed primarily for patients with severe impairment after stroke. To maximize the cost economics, hospital providers may wish to organize their robotic therapy programs based on cost-sensitivity factors. For further research, we suggest better collaboration in methods within this field to enable a more comparable cost computation across studies." @default.
• W2885663668 created "2018-08-22" @default.
• W2885663668 creator A5026984187 @default.
• W2885663668 creator A5037231711 @default.
• W2885663668 creator A5075491769 @default.
• W2885663668 date "2019-04-01" @default.
• W2885663668 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2885663668 title "The economic cost of robotic rehabilitation for adult stroke patients" @default.
• W2885663668 cites W1902863658 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W1983394866 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W1989927068 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W1994824286 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W1996847354 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2009802066 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2018179516 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2022911223 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2038514344 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2040750201 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2063801052 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2072084193 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2073702421 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2077764376 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2082077639 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2095683367 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2103262618 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2109887283 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2112433864 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2128614279 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2150106013 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2153482494 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2154146881 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2157117527 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2157823046 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2319801867 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2331740896 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2518986912 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W2571921956 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W4241521977 @default.
• W2885663668 cites W4294215472 @default.
• W2885663668 doi "https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2017-003896" @default.
• W2885663668 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30973526" @default.
• W2885663668 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2885663668 type Work @default.
• W2885663668 sameAs 2885663668 @default.
• W2885663668 citedByCount "32" @default.
• W2885663668 countsByYear W28856636682019 @default.
• W2885663668 countsByYear W28856636682020 @default.
• W2885663668 countsByYear W28856636682021 @default.
• W2885663668 countsByYear W28856636682022 @default.
• W2885663668 countsByYear W28856636682023 @default.
• W2885663668 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2885663668 hasAuthorship W2885663668A5026984187 @default.
• W2885663668 hasAuthorship W2885663668A5037231711 @default.
• W2885663668 hasAuthorship W2885663668A5075491769 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C102190203 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C2776125615 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C2780645631 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C102190203 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C112930515 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C127413603 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C142724271 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C159110408 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C160735492 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C162324750 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C17744445 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C1862650 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C199539241 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C27415008 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C2776125615 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C2778818304 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C2779473830 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C2780645631 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C2781145037 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C3019080777 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C50522688 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C71924100 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C78519656 @default.
• W2885663668 hasConceptScore W2885663668C99508421 @default.
• W2885663668 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2885663668 hasLocation W28856636681 @default.

• next