FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2885687911> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2885687911 abstract "INTRODUCTION : Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance increases plaque retention and produces a greater difficulty in optimal oral hygiene maintenance which predisposes to enamel demineralization and white spot formation. The use of probiotics has taken giant leaps since the 20th century. Probiotics can create a biofilm, acting as a protective lining for oral tissues against oral diseases by keeping the bacterial pathogens off oral tissues. AIM AND OBJECTIVES : The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of three different probiotics in inhibition of Streptococcus mutans in plaque around orthodontic brackets. Objectives of the study were to evaluate the effects of probiotic on streptococcus mutans levels within the group and compare the efficacy of three groups in inhibition of Streptococcus mutans in plaque around orthodontic brackets. MATERIALS AND METHOD : A randomized control trial performed, consisted of 80 orthodontic patients of age group between 14 to 29 years, divided into 4 groups of 20 each. Group 1 was the Probiotic lozenges group. The patients in group 2 were given probiotic sachets, those in group 3 were given probiotic drink and group 4 was the control group. . Samples were collected at 2 times: before the study began and after 30 days. Plaque specimens were collected from the labial surfaces immediately surrounding the orthodontic brackets of the maxillary lateral incisors using a 4-pass technique. The presence of S. mutans was evaluated using microbiological test. Statistical analysis was performed, and comparisons were made using a paired t test within the group and one way ANOVA performed to compare the efficacy between three groups. RESULTS : At the end of the study, Paired t test showed, there was reduction in S mutants CFU counts after 30 days of consumption of probiotic formulations in group 1 Probiotic Lozenges, group 2 Probiotic sachet and group 3 Probiotic drink compare to baseline. While comparing the efficacy between the groups, one way ANOVA and Tukey Post hoc Test analysis confirmed the maximum reduction of S. mutans CFU in 1 Probiotic lozenges group followed by 3 Probiotic Drink group followed by 2 Probiotic Sachet group. CONCLUSION : The consumption of probiotics cause a significant decrease in the S. mutans levels in the plaque around brackets in orthodontic patients." @default.
• W2885687911 created "2018-08-22" @default.
• W2885687911 creator A5008533951 @default.
• W2885687911 date "2017-04-01" @default.
• W2885687911 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2885687911 title "Comparing Effectiveness of Three Different Probiotics in Inhibition of Streptococcus Mutans in Plaque around Orthodontic Brackets: A Randomized Controlled trial" @default.
• W2885687911 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2885687911 type Work @default.
• W2885687911 sameAs 2885687911 @default.
• W2885687911 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2885687911 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W2885687911 hasAuthorship W2885687911A5008533951 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConcept C2778430296 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConcept C2779914569 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConcept C2780255968 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConcept C515851188 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConcept C523546767 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConceptScore W2885687911C141071460 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConceptScore W2885687911C168563851 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConceptScore W2885687911C199343813 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConceptScore W2885687911C2778430296 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConceptScore W2885687911C2779914569 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConceptScore W2885687911C2780255968 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConceptScore W2885687911C29694066 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConceptScore W2885687911C515851188 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConceptScore W2885687911C523546767 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConceptScore W2885687911C54355233 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConceptScore W2885687911C71924100 @default.
• W2885687911 hasConceptScore W2885687911C86803240 @default.
• W2885687911 hasLocation W28856879111 @default.
• W2885687911 hasOpenAccess W2885687911 @default.
• W2885687911 hasPrimaryLocation W28856879111 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W2000275248 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W2027632467 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W2380665151 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W2502379472 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W2532192148 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W2803946243 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W2916577537 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W2928920948 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W2937620399 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W2985221462 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W2986687809 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W3003945643 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W3033363945 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W3044718723 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W3081869143 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W3082339190 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W3083843238 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W3093492584 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W3190975875 @default.
• W2885687911 hasRelatedWork W3203613687 @default.
• W2885687911 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2885687911 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2885687911 magId "2885687911" @default.
• W2885687911 workType "dissertation" @default.