FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2885803498> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2885803498 endingPage "161" @default.
• W2885803498 startingPage "145" @default.
• W2885803498 abstract "Several studies have been carried out over the past 20 or so years to assess the level of visual air quality that is judged to be acceptable in urban settings. Groups of individuals were shown slides or computer-projected scenes under a variety of haze conditions and asked to judge whether each image represented acceptable visual air quality. The goal was to assess the level of haziness found to be acceptable for purposes of setting an urban visibility regulatory standard. More recently, similar studies were carried out in Beijing, China, and the more pristine Grand Canyon National Park and Great Gulf Wilderness. The studies clearly showed that when preference ratings were compared to measures of atmospheric haze such as atmospheric extinction, visual range, or deciview (dv), there was not a single indicator that represented acceptable levels of visual air quality for the varied urban or more remote settings. For instance, using a Washington, D.C., setting, 50% of the observers rated the landscape feature as not having acceptable visual air quality at an extinction of 0.19 km−1 (21 km visual range, 29 dv), while the 50% acceptability point for a Denver, Colorado, setting was 0.075 km−1 (52 km visual range, 20 dv) and for the Grand Canyon it was 0.023 km−1 (170 km visual range, 7 dv). Over the past three or four decades, many scene-specific visibility indices have been put forth as potential indicators of visibility levels as perceived by human observers. They include, but are not limited to, color and achromatic contrast of single landscape features, average and equivalent contrast of the entire image, edge detection algorithms such as the Sobel index, and just-noticeable difference or change indexes. This paper explores various scene-specific visual air quality indices and examines their applicability for use in quantifying visibility preference levels and judgments of visual air quality.Implications: Visibility acceptability studies clearly show that visibility become more unacceptable as haze increases. However, there are large variations in the preference levels for different scenes when universal haze indicators, such as atmospheric extinction, are used. This variability is significantly reduced when the sky–landscape contrast of the more distant landscape features in the observed scene is used. Analysis suggest that about 50% of individuals would find the visibility unacceptable if at any time the more distant landscape features nearly disappear, that is, they are at the visual range. This common metric could form the basis for setting an urban visibility standard." @default.
• W2885803498 created "2018-08-22" @default.
• W2885803498 creator A5048354659 @default.
• W2885803498 creator A5054844741 @default.
• W2885803498 creator A5055317146 @default.
• W2885803498 creator A5075186413 @default.
• W2885803498 creator A5081067803 @default.
• W2885803498 date "2018-12-06" @default.
• W2885803498 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2885803498 title "Which visibility indicators best represent a population’s preference for a level of visual air quality?" @default.
• W2885803498 cites W118993750 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W1508090489 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W1963856037 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W1965673669 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W1978775690 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W1990132053 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W2008488417 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W2015462510 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W2019217013 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W2036554648 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W2039252407 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W2041027177 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W2045896792 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W2053332310 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W2063308452 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W2072840565 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W2077135658 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W2096488605 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W2159386812 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W2312959230 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W2323086467 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W4251919849 @default.
• W2885803498 cites W2775056113 @default.
• W2885803498 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2018.1506370" @default.
• W2885803498 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30067459" @default.
• W2885803498 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2885803498 type Work @default.
• W2885803498 sameAs 2885803498 @default.
• W2885803498 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2885803498 countsByYear W28858034982021 @default.
• W2885803498 countsByYear W28858034982022 @default.
• W2885803498 countsByYear W28858034982023 @default.
• W2885803498 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2885803498 hasAuthorship W2885803498A5048354659 @default.
• W2885803498 hasAuthorship W2885803498A5054844741 @default.
• W2885803498 hasAuthorship W2885803498A5055317146 @default.
• W2885803498 hasAuthorship W2885803498A5075186413 @default.
• W2885803498 hasAuthorship W2885803498A5081067803 @default.
• W2885803498 hasBestOaLocation W28858034981 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConcept C123403432 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConcept C126314574 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConcept C153294291 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConcept C191935318 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConcept C2778304055 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConcept C79974267 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConcept C84859931 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConceptScore W2885803498C123403432 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConceptScore W2885803498C126314574 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConceptScore W2885803498C153294291 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConceptScore W2885803498C166957645 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConceptScore W2885803498C191935318 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConceptScore W2885803498C205649164 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConceptScore W2885803498C2778304055 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConceptScore W2885803498C2908647359 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConceptScore W2885803498C39432304 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConceptScore W2885803498C58640448 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConceptScore W2885803498C71924100 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConceptScore W2885803498C79974267 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConceptScore W2885803498C84859931 @default.
• W2885803498 hasConceptScore W2885803498C99454951 @default.
• W2885803498 hasFunder F4320332542 @default.
• W2885803498 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2885803498 hasLocation W28858034981 @default.
• W2885803498 hasLocation W28858034982 @default.
• W2885803498 hasOpenAccess W2885803498 @default.
• W2885803498 hasPrimaryLocation W28858034981 @default.
• W2885803498 hasRelatedWork W1920543124 @default.
• W2885803498 hasRelatedWork W2357703469 @default.
• W2885803498 hasRelatedWork W2360189371 @default.
• W2885803498 hasRelatedWork W2363003319 @default.
• W2885803498 hasRelatedWork W2377479197 @default.
• W2885803498 hasRelatedWork W2383404717 @default.
• W2885803498 hasRelatedWork W2898303697 @default.
• W2885803498 hasRelatedWork W3111225517 @default.
• W2885803498 hasRelatedWork W4360602179 @default.
• W2885803498 hasRelatedWork W2611131363 @default.
• W2885803498 hasVolume "69" @default.
• W2885803498 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2885803498 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2885803498 magId "2885803498" @default.
• W2885803498 workType "article" @default.