FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2886016479> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2886016479 endingPage "554" @default.
• W2886016479 startingPage "553" @default.
• W2886016479 abstract "Federal government agencies, particularly, the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and the National Council for the Development of Science and Technology (CNPq) provide the majority of sponsored research funds for Brazilian scientists. The CNPq is mainly devoted to researcher funding, whereas the CAPES evaluates postgraduate courses and funds undergraduate and graduate fellowships. CNPq also provides a particular form of funding called scientific productivity fellowship, which classifies the researchers under 2 main categories: category 1 and 2, by decreasing order of value. Category 1 is subdivided into 4 levels: 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D.1Arruda D Bezerra F Neris VA Toro PR Wainer J Brazilian computer science research: gender and regional distributions.Scientometrics. 2009; 79: 651-665Crossref Scopus (34) Google Scholar According to the Advisory Committee of the CNPq, the criteria for receiving a scientific productivity fellowship include scientific production, training of human resources, contribution to innovation, coordination and participation in research projects, and participation in editorial activities. Moreover, this Committee stated that considering the limited number of scholarships, the following criteria, among others, are used as classification parameters and apply to all categories/levels: (1) number of publications and impact factor of the journals, (2) number of national and international patents, (3) number of PhD students, (4) number of Master's students, and (6) the Hirsch Index (http://www.cnpq.br/web/guest/view//journal_content/56_INSTANCE_0oED/10157/49701). Recently, we demonstrated that Brazilian scientists have significantly contributed to the literature with publications in major periodicals in the areas of Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology.2de Andrade RS Martelli DRB de Almeida OP et al.Brazilian scientific production in Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018; 125: 179-181Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar Here, we describe the profiles and the scientific production of recipients of CNPq scientific productivity fellowship in Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology. Of the 217 fellows in Dentistry in December 2017 (http://www.cnpq.br/web/guest/bolsistas-vigentes), 34 describe Oral Medicine and/or Oral Pathology as their main areas of investigation. Using the publicly available Lattes curriculum in the Lattes Platform (http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/busca.do?metodo=apresentar), we constructed a database with information on each researcher in terms of institution, time since receiving the PhD degree, scientific production (number of published papers) and training of human resources (supervision of undergraduates scientific initiation student, Master's and PhD students, and postdoctoral fellows) Table I.Table IProfile of the researchers in Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology granted with a scientific productivity fellowship by the Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).Number of researchersGrant level (n)Published articles (n)Training of human resources (n)SISMScPhDPostdoc341A1B1C1D2Career5,449Career48332624132341719Median160.26Median14.209.587.080.942013-20172,1182013-2017104767023Median62.29Median3.052.232.050.67SIS: Scientific Initiation Student, MSc: Master of Science, PhD: Doctor of Philosophy, PD: Postdoctoral fellow. Open table in a new tab SIS: Scientific Initiation Student, MSc: Master of Science, PhD: Doctor of Philosophy, PD: Postdoctoral fellow. For the analysis of scientific production, we considered all publications and counseling services over the researcher's career, defined as the period between the date of publication of the first scientific paper and December 2017. We also analyzed the publications and consultations over the past 5 years, considering the period between 2013 and 2017 (average duration of fellowship). The 34 researcher fellows, with predominance of males (n = 22; 64.7%), were distributed in 7 Brazilian states: São Paulo (n = 14; 41.17%), Minas Gerais (n = 8; 23.52%), Bahia (n = 3; 8.82%), Rio Grande do Norte (n = 3; 8.82%), Goiás (n = 2; 5.88%), Pernambuco (n = 2; 5.88%) and Rio Grande do Sul (n = 2; 5.88%). As for the home institution, researchers were spread over 15 different institutions in the country. However, 3 institutions are responsible for approximately 35.3% of the fellows: Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo (FOUSP-SP) (n = 4; 11.76%), Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (FOP-UNICAMP) (n = 4; 11.76%), and Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (FO-UFMG) (n = 4; 11.76%). The median time since receiving the PhD degree was 20.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] 12–44). Over their academic career, the 34 researchers published 5449 articles in scientific journals, with an average of 160.26 articles per researcher (range 67–323 articles). Of the 5449 articles, 3176 (58.28%) were indexed in the Web of Science (an average of 93.41 articles/researcher), and 3035 (55.67%) articles were indexed in the Scopus (an average of 89.23 articles/researcher). Over their career, the fellows counseled 483 undergraduate students in research (median 14.20; range 3–49), 326 master students (median 9.58; range 5–41), 241 PhD students (median 7.08; range 1–30), and 32 postdoctoral fellows (median 0.94; range 0–11). The median Hirsch Index of the Institute for Scientific Information (H-index ISI) of the fellows is 15.14. As expected, our findings show that fellows in Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology who are recipients of the CNPq scientific productivity scholarship are a group with significant scientific production, as also observed in other areas, such as Medicine and Pharmacy.3Oliveira E A Colosimo EA Martelli DR et al.Comparison of Brazilian researchers in clinical medicine: are criteria for ranking well-adjusted?.Scientometrics. 2011; 90: 429-443Google Scholar, 4Oliveira EA Peicots-Filho R Martelli DR et al.Is there a correlation between journal impact factor and researchers’ performance? A study comprising the fields of clinical nephrology and neurosciences.Scientometrics. 2013; 97: 149-160Crossref Scopus (7) Google Scholar, 5Rodrigues LO Gouvea MM Marques FCC Mourao SC Overview of the scientific production in the Pharmacy area in Brazil: profile and productivity of researchers granted with fellowships by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development.Scientometrics. 2017; 110: 1157-1171Crossref Scopus (5) Google Scholar The Minas Gerais State Research Foundation-FAPEMIG, Minas Gerais, Brazil and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development – CNPq, Brazil." @default.
• W2886016479 created "2018-08-22" @default.
• W2886016479 creator A5025361824 @default.
• W2886016479 creator A5035755230 @default.
• W2886016479 creator A5036550619 @default.
• W2886016479 creator A5065114082 @default.
• W2886016479 creator A5086669838 @default.
• W2886016479 date "2018-12-01" @default.
• W2886016479 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2886016479 title "Scientific production of the Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) researchers in the field of Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology granted with a scientific productivity fellowship" @default.
• W2886016479 cites W2016444923 @default.
• W2886016479 cites W2058655839 @default.
• W2886016479 cites W2122809367 @default.
• W2886016479 cites W2584262837 @default.
• W2886016479 cites W2750486787 @default.
• W2886016479 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2018.07.057" @default.
• W2886016479 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30316881" @default.
• W2886016479 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2886016479 type Work @default.
• W2886016479 sameAs 2886016479 @default.
• W2886016479 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2886016479 countsByYear W28860164792019 @default.
• W2886016479 countsByYear W28860164792020 @default.
• W2886016479 countsByYear W28860164792021 @default.
• W2886016479 countsByYear W28860164792023 @default.
• W2886016479 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2886016479 hasAuthorship W2886016479A5025361824 @default.
• W2886016479 hasAuthorship W2886016479A5035755230 @default.
• W2886016479 hasAuthorship W2886016479A5036550619 @default.
• W2886016479 hasAuthorship W2886016479A5065114082 @default.
• W2886016479 hasAuthorship W2886016479A5086669838 @default.
• W2886016479 hasBestOaLocation W28860164791 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConcept C204983608 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConcept C3020774429 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConcept C525823164 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConceptScore W2886016479C138885662 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConceptScore W2886016479C161191863 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConceptScore W2886016479C162324750 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConceptScore W2886016479C17744445 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConceptScore W2886016479C199539241 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConceptScore W2886016479C204983608 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConceptScore W2886016479C2778137410 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConceptScore W2886016479C2778805511 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConceptScore W2886016479C2779473830 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConceptScore W2886016479C3020774429 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConceptScore W2886016479C41008148 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConceptScore W2886016479C41895202 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConceptScore W2886016479C50522688 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConceptScore W2886016479C509550671 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConceptScore W2886016479C525823164 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConceptScore W2886016479C71924100 @default.
• W2886016479 hasConceptScore W2886016479C83867959 @default.
• W2886016479 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2886016479 hasLocation W28860164791 @default.
• W2886016479 hasLocation W28860164792 @default.
• W2886016479 hasOpenAccess W2886016479 @default.
• W2886016479 hasPrimaryLocation W28860164791 @default.
• W2886016479 hasRelatedWork W2072455680 @default.
• W2886016479 hasRelatedWork W2238156834 @default.
• W2886016479 hasRelatedWork W2529708521 @default.
• W2886016479 hasRelatedWork W2769647066 @default.
• W2886016479 hasRelatedWork W3027978877 @default.
• W2886016479 hasRelatedWork W3173390368 @default.
• W2886016479 hasRelatedWork W3174269779 @default.
• W2886016479 hasRelatedWork W4206202781 @default.
• W2886016479 hasRelatedWork W4292004714 @default.
• W2886016479 hasRelatedWork W4327767232 @default.
• W2886016479 hasVolume "126" @default.
• W2886016479 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2886016479 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2886016479 magId "2886016479" @default.
• W2886016479 workType "article" @default.