FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2887123783> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2887123783 abstract "Despite its complexity, the accurate structural modelling of masonry still represents an active field of research, due to several practical applications in civil engineering, with special reference to the preservation and restoration of cultural heritage items. The above-mentioned tasks call for very accurate analyses of masonry structures, able to capture their peculiar mechanical features in the nonlinear range. With this purpose three different approaches are compared to predict the in-plane failure behaviour of masonry walls: a FEM-based multiscale Couple-Stress model, a combined Finite-Discrete Element Model (FEM/DEM) and non- standard Limit Analysis performed by means of a code specifically developed for masonry (ALMA). On one hand, the FEM-based Couple-Stress multiscale model may be regarded as an enhanced version of the multi-level domain decomposition approach, recently applied to masonry [1]. Both the micro-constituents (i.e. units and joints) are modelled in a standard Cauchy continuum setting, while the homogenized masonry material employed at the macro- scale is represented as a Couple-Stress continuum, i.e. a constrained version of the Cosserat model, which is able to take into account the size effects related to the bending deformations [2]. A suitable macro-to-micro switching criterion is introduced, in order to adaptively zoom- in the regions affected by damage initiation, thus reducing the overall computational costs. On the other hand, the FEM/DEM method, initially developed for the study of granular materials, has been recently adopted for the study of masonry material [3][4]. FEM/DEM is based on a micro-modelling approach. Here blocks are modelled as rigid bodies and mortar joints are modelled as zero thickness elasto-plastic Mohr-Coulomb interfaces. The method is a combination of classic FE and DE models. The model relies on a triangular discretization of the domain with embedded crack elements, that activate whenever the peak strength is reached. FEs allows to reproduce elastic strain while DEs are able to model the frictional cohesive behavior exhibited by masonry. Finally, Limit Analysis is able to provide fast and reliable results in term of collapse multiplier and relative cinematism. Here a non-standard Limit Analysis (non-associative rules) is adopted [5][6][7] via an own made procedure based on Non-Linear and Non-Convex Mathematical Programming, taking into account friction at interfaces, settlements of the supports, reinforcements and/or cohesion among stones. A numerical comparison is proposed to evaluate the field and limit of application of the three approaches. Acknowledgments. This work is supported by Italian Ministry of University and Research (P.R.I.N. National Grant 2015, B86J16002300001; Sapienza and Calabria Research Units) and by Sapienza University Grant 2016, B82F16005920005 References [1]  Greco, F., Leonetti, L., Luciano, R., and Trovalusci, P. (2017) Multiscale failure analysis of periodic masonry structures with traditional and fiber-reinforced mortar joints. Composites Part B: Engineering 118, 75-95. [2]  Leonetti, L., Greco, F., Trovalusci, P., Luciano, R., and Masiani, R. (2018) A multiscale damage analysis of periodic composites using a couple-stress/cauchy multidomain model: Application to masonry structures. Composites Part B: Engineering 141, 50-59. [3]  Reccia, E., Cazzani, A., and Cecchi, A. (2012) FEM-DEM modeling for out-of-plane loaded masonry panels: A limit analysis approach. Open Civil Engineering Journal 6, 231-238. [4]  Baraldi, D., Reccia, E., and Cecchi, A. (2017) In plane loaded masonry walls: DEM and FEM/DEM models. a critical review. Meccanica, 10.1007/s11012-017-0704-3. [5]  Baggio, C., and Trovalusci, P. (2000) Collapse behaviour of three- dimensional brick-block systems using non-linear programming. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 10, 2, 181-195. [6]  Baggio, C., and Trovalusci, P. (2016) 3D Limit Analysis of roman groin vaults. In: Brick and Block Masonry: Trends, Innovations and Challenges - Proceedings of the 16th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference, IBMAC 2016, 1023-1028. [7]  Trovalusci, P., and Baggio, C. (2003) An optimisation algorithm for the collapse detection of stone masonry structures. In: Advances in Architecture, 15, 473-481." @default.
• W2887123783 created "2018-08-22" @default.
• W2887123783 creator A5035901931 @default.
• W2887123783 creator A5068929304 @default.
• W2887123783 creator A5074337251 @default.
• W2887123783 creator A5076801748 @default.
• W2887123783 date "2018-06-02" @default.
• W2887123783 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2887123783 title "Invited: Multiscale couple-stress model, FEM/DEM approach and Limit Analysis for the in-plane failure analysis of masonry walls: a critical review" @default.
• W2887123783 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2887123783 type Work @default.
• W2887123783 sameAs 2887123783 @default.
• W2887123783 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2887123783 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2887123783 hasAuthorship W2887123783A5035901931 @default.
• W2887123783 hasAuthorship W2887123783A5068929304 @default.
• W2887123783 hasAuthorship W2887123783A5074337251 @default.
• W2887123783 hasAuthorship W2887123783A5076801748 @default.
• W2887123783 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2887123783 hasConcept C135628077 @default.
• W2887123783 hasConcept C2779100365 @default.
• W2887123783 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2887123783 hasConcept C535899295 @default.
• W2887123783 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2887123783 hasConceptScore W2887123783C127413603 @default.
• W2887123783 hasConceptScore W2887123783C135628077 @default.
• W2887123783 hasConceptScore W2887123783C2779100365 @default.
• W2887123783 hasConceptScore W2887123783C41008148 @default.
• W2887123783 hasConceptScore W2887123783C535899295 @default.
• W2887123783 hasConceptScore W2887123783C66938386 @default.
• W2887123783 hasLocation W28871237831 @default.
• W2887123783 hasOpenAccess W2887123783 @default.
• W2887123783 hasPrimaryLocation W28871237831 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W1990638140 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W1990854534 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W2032612129 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W2075402347 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W2137929048 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W2201030741 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W2241827164 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W2288747612 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W2335879592 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W2461052898 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W2550228315 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W2752604596 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W2761947585 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W2786193122 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W2887795851 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W2888894774 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W2900687576 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W2944745265 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W3021744072 @default.
• W2887123783 hasRelatedWork W3097858385 @default.
• W2887123783 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2887123783 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2887123783 magId "2887123783" @default.
• W2887123783 workType "article" @default.