Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2887431661> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 74 of
74
with 100 items per page.
- W2887431661 endingPage "290" @default.
- W2887431661 startingPage "277" @default.
- W2887431661 abstract "Aim/Purpose: This study aimed to examine whether there is a difference between manual feedback and online feedback with regard to feedback quality, respondents’ percentage, reliability and the amount of verbal comments written by students. Background: The quality of teaching is an important component of academic work. There are various methods for testing the quality of teaching; one of these methods is through students’ feedback. Methodology: This study used a quantitative approach, including the quantification of qualitative verbal data collected through an open question in the questionnaire. A sample of 180 courses was randomly chosen, 90 courses were evaluated manually and 90 were evaluated online. The number of students ranges from 7 to 60 students per course. In total 4678 students participated in the study. Contribution: The findings show that there is almost an identical pattern of feedback of manual and online course teaching evaluation. These findings encourage a continued use of this evaluation method. Findings: No significant differences were found between manual feedback and online feedback in the students’ evaluation of the lecturer/course. The percentage of respondents was significantly higher in the manual feedback than in the online feedback. The number of qualitative comments was significantly greater in the online feedback than in the manual feedback. Impact on Society: The findings of this study refute the claims with regard to the unreliability of an online teaching evaluation. These findings reflect the advantages of using online feedback, such as cost savings, granting more time to students in order to provide feedback, and reducing disturbance during lectures. Future Research: The gender aspect was not taken into account in the study. Therefore, we recommend conducting a follow-up study that will examine gender differences in directions of- difference between male and female lecturers, and differences between male and female students in teaching evaluation." @default.
- W2887431661 created "2018-08-22" @default.
- W2887431661 creator A5087043780 @default.
- W2887431661 date "2017-01-01" @default.
- W2887431661 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2887431661 title "Teaching Quality Evaluation: Online vs. Manually, Facts and Myths" @default.
- W2887431661 cites W1514881224 @default.
- W2887431661 cites W1797652430 @default.
- W2887431661 cites W2062544827 @default.
- W2887431661 cites W2091259418 @default.
- W2887431661 cites W2168491419 @default.
- W2887431661 cites W2999063694 @default.
- W2887431661 doi "https://doi.org/10.28945/3904" @default.
- W2887431661 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2887431661 type Work @default.
- W2887431661 sameAs 2887431661 @default.
- W2887431661 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W2887431661 countsByYear W28874316612020 @default.
- W2887431661 countsByYear W28874316612021 @default.
- W2887431661 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2887431661 hasAuthorship W2887431661A5087043780 @default.
- W2887431661 hasBestOaLocation W28874316611 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConcept C2986081426 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConceptScore W2887431661C111472728 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConceptScore W2887431661C121332964 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConceptScore W2887431661C138885662 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConceptScore W2887431661C145420912 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConceptScore W2887431661C15744967 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConceptScore W2887431661C163258240 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConceptScore W2887431661C185592680 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConceptScore W2887431661C198531522 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConceptScore W2887431661C2779530757 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConceptScore W2887431661C2986081426 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConceptScore W2887431661C41008148 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConceptScore W2887431661C43214815 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConceptScore W2887431661C43617362 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConceptScore W2887431661C509550671 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConceptScore W2887431661C62520636 @default.
- W2887431661 hasConceptScore W2887431661C71924100 @default.
- W2887431661 hasLocation W28874316611 @default.
- W2887431661 hasOpenAccess W2887431661 @default.
- W2887431661 hasPrimaryLocation W28874316611 @default.
- W2887431661 hasRelatedWork W2057142235 @default.
- W2887431661 hasRelatedWork W2116911522 @default.
- W2887431661 hasRelatedWork W2160599399 @default.
- W2887431661 hasRelatedWork W2246664734 @default.
- W2887431661 hasRelatedWork W2275080951 @default.
- W2887431661 hasRelatedWork W2375009213 @default.
- W2887431661 hasRelatedWork W2390860293 @default.
- W2887431661 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2887431661 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2887431661 hasRelatedWork W3033029863 @default.
- W2887431661 hasVolume "16" @default.
- W2887431661 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2887431661 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2887431661 magId "2887431661" @default.
- W2887431661 workType "article" @default.