FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2887751515> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2887751515 endingPage "E983" @default.
• W2887751515 startingPage "E975" @default.
• W2887751515 abstract "Abstract Background and study aims Severe fibrosis poses a challenge in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Recently, the pocket-creation method (PCM) has been developed for overcoming various difficulties of ESD. A specific tapered hood is used for adequate traction in the PCM, and endoscopic operability becomes stable in the pocket. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of the PCM in ESD for cases with severe fibrosis. Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed 1000 consecutive colorectal ESD cases (April 2006 to January 2017). Since 2016, the PCM was performed in 58 cases. The indications for ESD included (1) tumors ≥ 20 mm in size diagnosed as intramucosal cancer or high-grade dysplasia and part of T1a cancer using magnifying endoscopic examinations and (2) tumors that appeared impossible to resect with endoscopic mucosal resection because of suspected fibrosis. We identified 120 cases with severe fibrosis and compared them to cases without severe fibrosis. Additionally, the 120 severe fibrosis cases were divided into the PCM and non-PCM groups. En bloc resection, procedure time, discontinuation, and complications were analyzed between these 2 groups. Results Among all 1000 ESDs, severe fibrosis and discontinuation rates were 12.0 % (120 cases) and 1.8 % (18 cases), respectively. Regarding the comparison between cases with severe fibrosis and with no severe fibrosis, there were significant differences about en bloc resection rate (78.3 % vs. 95.7 %, P < 0.001), discontinuance rate (12.5 % vs. 0.3 %, P < 0.001), and perforation rate (8.3 % vs. 2.6 %, P = 0.001). Among the 120 cases with severe fibrosis, 21 and 99 cases were in the PCM and non-PCM groups, respectively. The PCM group had a higher en bloc resection rate (95.2 vs. 74.7, P = 0.03), a shorter mean procedure time (min) (79.6 ± 26.5 vs. 118.8 ± 71.0, P = 0.001), and no cases of discontinuation. An analysis of the interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of severe fibrosis among the 3 endoscopists showed kappa values of > 0.6. Conclusions In cases with severe fibrosis, the PCM with ESD improved en bloc resection rates and shortened the procedure time compared to the conventional non-PCM method. Additionally, the PCM reduced the discontinuation rate." @default.
• W2887751515 created "2018-08-22" @default.
• W2887751515 creator A5021943547 @default.
• W2887751515 creator A5027531032 @default.
• W2887751515 creator A5029169674 @default.
• W2887751515 creator A5036017250 @default.
• W2887751515 creator A5038459903 @default.
• W2887751515 creator A5045173926 @default.
• W2887751515 creator A5050131493 @default.
• W2887751515 creator A5055130191 @default.
• W2887751515 creator A5061869584 @default.
• W2887751515 creator A5061934624 @default.
• W2887751515 creator A5073846827 @default.
• W2887751515 creator A5080829935 @default.
• W2887751515 creator A5083496309 @default.
• W2887751515 date "2018-08-01" @default.
• W2887751515 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2887751515 title "The efficacy of the pocket-creation method for cases with severe fibrosis in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection" @default.
• W2887751515 cites W1898221368 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W193385261 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W1948935061 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W1981013931 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W1982429622 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W2029487819 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W2036623975 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W2061159935 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W2066202955 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W2069360264 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W2073056029 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W2086327306 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W2152566810 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W2297429128 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W2408929913 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W2440155082 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W2496921443 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W2504522418 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W2544046360 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W2588262134 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W2751523996 @default.
• W2887751515 cites W2589340867 @default.
• W2887751515 doi "https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0593-5818" @default.
• W2887751515 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6075949" @default.
• W2887751515 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30083587" @default.
• W2887751515 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2887751515 type Work @default.
• W2887751515 sameAs 2887751515 @default.
• W2887751515 citedByCount "34" @default.
• W2887751515 countsByYear W28877515152019 @default.
• W2887751515 countsByYear W28877515152020 @default.
• W2887751515 countsByYear W28877515152021 @default.
• W2887751515 countsByYear W28877515152022 @default.
• W2887751515 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2887751515 hasAuthorship W2887751515A5021943547 @default.
• W2887751515 hasAuthorship W2887751515A5027531032 @default.
• W2887751515 hasAuthorship W2887751515A5029169674 @default.
• W2887751515 hasAuthorship W2887751515A5036017250 @default.
• W2887751515 hasAuthorship W2887751515A5038459903 @default.
• W2887751515 hasAuthorship W2887751515A5045173926 @default.
• W2887751515 hasAuthorship W2887751515A5050131493 @default.
• W2887751515 hasAuthorship W2887751515A5055130191 @default.
• W2887751515 hasAuthorship W2887751515A5061869584 @default.
• W2887751515 hasAuthorship W2887751515A5061934624 @default.
• W2887751515 hasAuthorship W2887751515A5073846827 @default.
• W2887751515 hasAuthorship W2887751515A5080829935 @default.
• W2887751515 hasAuthorship W2887751515A5083496309 @default.
• W2887751515 hasBestOaLocation W28877515151 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConcept C2775894508 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConcept C2777137803 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConcept C2778456384 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConcept C2778527123 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConcept C2778715236 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConcept C2780559512 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConceptScore W2887751515C121608353 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConceptScore W2887751515C126322002 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConceptScore W2887751515C141071460 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConceptScore W2887751515C191897082 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConceptScore W2887751515C192562407 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConceptScore W2887751515C2775894508 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConceptScore W2887751515C2777137803 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConceptScore W2887751515C2778456384 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConceptScore W2887751515C2778527123 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConceptScore W2887751515C2778715236 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConceptScore W2887751515C2780559512 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConceptScore W2887751515C526805850 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConceptScore W2887751515C71924100 @default.
• W2887751515 hasConceptScore W2887751515C90924648 @default.
• W2887751515 hasIssue "08" @default.
• W2887751515 hasLocation W28877515151 @default.
• W2887751515 hasLocation W28877515152 @default.
• W2887751515 hasLocation W28877515153 @default.

• next