Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2888165890> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 93 of
93
with 100 items per page.
- W2888165890 endingPage "844" @default.
- W2888165890 startingPage "835" @default.
- W2888165890 abstract "Tail biting is a major welfare and economic problem in intensive pig production. The objectives of this study were to (1) determine tail lesion prevalence at a German abattoir, (2) test for associations between meat inspection findings and tail lesions, (3) assess the agreement between tail necrosis recorded during meat inspection and scored from pictures and (4) test whether the tail biting management tool ‘Schwanzbeiß-Interventions-Programm’ (SchwIP) had an effect on tail lesion prevalence. A total of three observers scored tail lesions from pictures of 43 328 pigs from 32 farms where SchwIP had been applied, and of 36 626 pigs from 32 control farms. Tail lesions were classified as score 0: no visible lesion, score 1: mild lesion, score 2: severe lesion and score 3: necrosis. In addition, complete loss of tail (CL) was recorded. Tail necrosis was the only tail-related carcase finding recorded by meat inspectors. (1) Tail lesion prevalences in pigs from control farms were 23.6% for score 1, 1.02% for score 2, 0.55% for score 3 and 0.41% for CL. The combined prevalence of any lesion and/or CL was 25.4%. (2) Pleurisy, lung findings, signs of inflammation in the legs, arthritis and abscesses were the most frequent meat inspection findings (prevalences of 8.46%, 8.09%, 2.99%, 0.83% and 0.23%, respectively; n=79 954 pigs). Leg inflammation, arthritis and abscesses were more prevalent in pigs with tail lesions of any degree compared with pigs without tail lesions (3.39% v. 2.83%, 1.06% v. 0.75% and 0.39% v. 0.17%, respectively; all P<0.001, n=79 954 pigs). Pigs with severe tail lesions also had more lung findings (2.00% v. 0.17%, P<0.001). (3) Tail necrosis scored during meat inspection resulted in lower prevalence than scored from pictures (0.22% v. 0.69%; n=79 954 SchwIP and control farm pigs). (4) Although tail lesion prevalence was significantly higher in pigs from SchwIP than in pigs from control farms during the first 3 months (32.2% v. 23.8%, P=0.015), it was not significantly higher during the remainder of the year (22.6 v. 26.9, 24.4 v. 21.4 and 24.0 v. 28.0, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively). In conclusion, meat inspection results in much lower tail lesion prevalences than tail lesion assessment from pictures, even if only the category ‘necrosis’ is compared. Advising farms on tail biting using the management tool SchwIP helped to decrease the prevalence of tail lesions on problem farms." @default.
- W2888165890 created "2018-08-31" @default.
- W2888165890 creator A5000062381 @default.
- W2888165890 creator A5021427226 @default.
- W2888165890 creator A5042682001 @default.
- W2888165890 creator A5046749744 @default.
- W2888165890 creator A5063198564 @default.
- W2888165890 creator A5082119007 @default.
- W2888165890 creator A5088666829 @default.
- W2888165890 creator A5091882681 @default.
- W2888165890 date "2019-01-01" @default.
- W2888165890 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2888165890 title "Tail lesions in fattening pigs: relationships with postmortem meat inspection and influence of a tail biting management tool" @default.
- W2888165890 cites W163386696 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W1981074550 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W1996487103 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2006117482 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2015686675 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2020767032 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2047335961 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2058890096 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2059957026 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2070285512 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2070538996 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2087955309 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2106660965 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2119023085 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2119120184 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2136541711 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2138360120 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2147838369 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2150290224 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2205401670 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2296213758 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2316161352 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2330907784 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2432344402 @default.
- W2888165890 cites W2610925885 @default.
- W2888165890 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731118002070" @default.
- W2888165890 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30132431" @default.
- W2888165890 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2888165890 type Work @default.
- W2888165890 sameAs 2888165890 @default.
- W2888165890 citedByCount "25" @default.
- W2888165890 countsByYear W28881658902019 @default.
- W2888165890 countsByYear W28881658902020 @default.
- W2888165890 countsByYear W28881658902021 @default.
- W2888165890 countsByYear W28881658902022 @default.
- W2888165890 countsByYear W28881658902023 @default.
- W2888165890 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2888165890 hasAuthorship W2888165890A5000062381 @default.
- W2888165890 hasAuthorship W2888165890A5021427226 @default.
- W2888165890 hasAuthorship W2888165890A5042682001 @default.
- W2888165890 hasAuthorship W2888165890A5046749744 @default.
- W2888165890 hasAuthorship W2888165890A5063198564 @default.
- W2888165890 hasAuthorship W2888165890A5082119007 @default.
- W2888165890 hasAuthorship W2888165890A5088666829 @default.
- W2888165890 hasAuthorship W2888165890A5091882681 @default.
- W2888165890 hasBestOaLocation W28881658901 @default.
- W2888165890 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2888165890 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2888165890 hasConcept C2781156865 @default.
- W2888165890 hasConcept C42972112 @default.
- W2888165890 hasConcept C503630168 @default.
- W2888165890 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2888165890 hasConceptScore W2888165890C126322002 @default.
- W2888165890 hasConceptScore W2888165890C142724271 @default.
- W2888165890 hasConceptScore W2888165890C2781156865 @default.
- W2888165890 hasConceptScore W2888165890C42972112 @default.
- W2888165890 hasConceptScore W2888165890C503630168 @default.
- W2888165890 hasConceptScore W2888165890C71924100 @default.
- W2888165890 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W2888165890 hasLocation W28881658901 @default.
- W2888165890 hasLocation W28881658902 @default.
- W2888165890 hasOpenAccess W2888165890 @default.
- W2888165890 hasPrimaryLocation W28881658901 @default.
- W2888165890 hasRelatedWork W1966504330 @default.
- W2888165890 hasRelatedWork W1966775726 @default.
- W2888165890 hasRelatedWork W1974041167 @default.
- W2888165890 hasRelatedWork W1979139803 @default.
- W2888165890 hasRelatedWork W2030889776 @default.
- W2888165890 hasRelatedWork W2037631372 @default.
- W2888165890 hasRelatedWork W2070567609 @default.
- W2888165890 hasRelatedWork W2073527559 @default.
- W2888165890 hasRelatedWork W2159000141 @default.
- W2888165890 hasRelatedWork W2391409986 @default.
- W2888165890 hasVolume "13" @default.
- W2888165890 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2888165890 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2888165890 magId "2888165890" @default.
- W2888165890 workType "article" @default.