FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2888179338> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2888179338 endingPage "e89" @default.
• W2888179338 startingPage "e79" @default.
• W2888179338 abstract "Rationale and Objectives This study employs clinical/radiological evaluation in establishing the optimum imaging conditions for breast cancer imaging using the X-ray propagation-based phase-contrast tomography. Materials and Methods Two series of experiments were conducted and in total 161 synchrotron-based computed tomography (CT) reconstructions of one breast mastectomy specimen were produced at different imaging conditions. Imaging factors include sample-to-detector distance, X-ray energy, CT reconstruction method, phase retrieval algorithm applied to the CT projection images and maximum intensity projection. Observers including breast radiologists and medical imaging experts compared the quality of the reconstructed images with reference images approximating the conventional (absorption) CT. Various radiological image quality attributes in a visual grading analysis design were used for the radiological assessments. Results The results show that the application of the longest achievable sample-to-detector distance (9.31 m), the lowest employed X-ray energy (32 keV), the full phase retrieval, and the maximum intensity projection can significantly improve the radiological quality of the image. Several combinations of imaging variables resulted in images with very high-quality scores. Conclusion The results of the present study will support future experimental and clinical attempts to further optimize this innovative approach to breast cancer imaging. This study employs clinical/radiological evaluation in establishing the optimum imaging conditions for breast cancer imaging using the X-ray propagation-based phase-contrast tomography. Two series of experiments were conducted and in total 161 synchrotron-based computed tomography (CT) reconstructions of one breast mastectomy specimen were produced at different imaging conditions. Imaging factors include sample-to-detector distance, X-ray energy, CT reconstruction method, phase retrieval algorithm applied to the CT projection images and maximum intensity projection. Observers including breast radiologists and medical imaging experts compared the quality of the reconstructed images with reference images approximating the conventional (absorption) CT. Various radiological image quality attributes in a visual grading analysis design were used for the radiological assessments. The results show that the application of the longest achievable sample-to-detector distance (9.31 m), the lowest employed X-ray energy (32 keV), the full phase retrieval, and the maximum intensity projection can significantly improve the radiological quality of the image. Several combinations of imaging variables resulted in images with very high-quality scores. The results of the present study will support future experimental and clinical attempts to further optimize this innovative approach to breast cancer imaging." @default.
• W2888179338 created "2018-08-31" @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5005344657 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5005982267 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5006101602 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5008667766 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5016069392 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5022180971 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5022599309 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5026204894 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5028262073 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5029394117 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5034083660 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5040357087 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5044157407 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5053391962 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5055715703 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5056941899 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5058196770 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5062023411 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5062556839 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5066727425 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5078934251 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5080681394 @default.
• W2888179338 creator A5087823974 @default.
• W2888179338 date "2019-06-01" @default.
• W2888179338 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2888179338 title "Toward Improving Breast Cancer Imaging: Radiological Assessment of Propagation-Based Phase-Contrast CT Technology" @default.
• W2888179338 cites W1119770155 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W1757407923 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W1938345065 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W1963483517 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W1966269405 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W1972248827 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W1973170994 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W1975347873 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W1975631995 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W1990382796 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W1997109904 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2007348179 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2009557540 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2028084613 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2030106215 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2038023641 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2053097068 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2053285379 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2071099763 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2086059573 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2087111693 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2109492853 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2110376121 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2110445810 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2118857601 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2123683167 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2125449863 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2166699377 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2211565800 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2255944052 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2327037637 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W250128136 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2583656510 @default.
• W2888179338 cites W2804298202 @default.
• W2888179338 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.07.008" @default.
• W2888179338 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30149975" @default.
• W2888179338 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2888179338 type Work @default.
• W2888179338 sameAs 2888179338 @default.
• W2888179338 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W2888179338 countsByYear W28881793382019 @default.
• W2888179338 countsByYear W28881793382020 @default.
• W2888179338 countsByYear W28881793382021 @default.
• W2888179338 countsByYear W28881793382022 @default.
• W2888179338 countsByYear W28881793382023 @default.
• W2888179338 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5005344657 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5005982267 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5006101602 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5008667766 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5016069392 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5022180971 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5022599309 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5026204894 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5028262073 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5029394117 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5034083660 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5040357087 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5044157407 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5053391962 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5055715703 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5056941899 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5058196770 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5062023411 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5062556839 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5066727425 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5078934251 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5080681394 @default.
• W2888179338 hasAuthorship W2888179338A5087823974 @default.
• W2888179338 hasBestOaLocation W28881793382 @default.

• next