FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2888626897> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2888626897 endingPage "1223" @default.
• W2888626897 startingPage "1216" @default.
• W2888626897 abstract "Abstract Background Silicone blocks and sleeves are simple devices used in cosmetic surgery. They are generally viewed as safe and effective; however, there is little information on their use in the penis. Aim This study evaluates a large single-surgeon series using a novel silicone sleeve penile implant (Penuma) to cosmetically correct the flaccid penis. Methods 526 patients underwent elective cosmetic penile surgery using a silicone sleeve penile implant between 2009 and 2014. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for a retrospective analysis, and study consent was obtained from 400 patients. Penile circumference was measured before surgery, immediately after surgery, and 30–90 days after the implant surgery. Using the nonvalidated Augmentation Phalloplasty Patient Selection and Satisfaction Inventory (APPSSI), changes in self-confidence, self-esteem, and satisfaction scores were assayed 6–8 weeks postoperatively. Scores were again assayed 2–6 years postoperatively in 77% of patients. The questionnaires rated patient self-confidence, self-esteem, and satisfaction as very low, low, medium, high, or very high. Main Outcome Measure Outcomes include changes in penile measurements; changes in APPSSI satisfaction, self-confidence, and self-esteem scores; and incidences of adverse events. Results In the 400 patients, the implantation of the Penuma silicone implant increased midshaft circumference from an average of 8.5 ± 1.2 cm to 13.4 ± 1.9 cm (56.7% increase; P &lt; .001). A 2-category improvement in self-confidence and self-esteem was noted in 83% of patients 6–8 weeks postoperatively. On long-term follow-up (2–6 years; mean 4 years), 72% patients remained improved (2-category improvement in APPSSI scoring), and 81% of subjects reported “high” or “very high” levels of satisfaction. The most frequently reported postoperative complications were seroma (4.8%), scar formation (4.5%), and infection (3.3%). No patients reported any changes in sexual function, erections, or ejaculation. 3% experienced adverse events necessitating device removal. Clinical Implications The Penuma silicone implant can help patients cosmetically correct the penis with increased flaccid penile girth and achieve enhanced self-confidence and self-esteem over the short- and long term. Strengths and Limitations Strengths include the large number of subjects (400 men) and the long-term follow-up period (2–6 years). Limitations include the retrospective and single-surgeon (inventor) nature of the study; the presence of 126 non-consenting subjects, potentially impacting the complication rate; and the APPSSI’s lack of validation. Conclusion Retrospective analysis of 400 men electing to have penile cosmetic correction with the Penuma device demonstrates improvements in girth (56.7% increase) and high and sustained patient satisfaction, self-confidence, and self-esteem with minimal and manageable adverse events." @default.
• W2888626897 created "2018-08-31" @default.
• W2888626897 creator A5021014831 @default.
• W2888626897 creator A5024287701 @default.
• W2888626897 creator A5048799256 @default.
• W2888626897 creator A5051402370 @default.
• W2888626897 creator A5089336383 @default.
• W2888626897 date "2018-08-23" @default.
• W2888626897 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2888626897 title "A Single-Surgeon Retrospective and Preliminary Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Penuma Silicone Sleeve Implant for Elective Cosmetic Correction of the Flaccid Penis" @default.
• W2888626897 cites W1998489962 @default.
• W2888626897 cites W2001481237 @default.
• W2888626897 cites W2011535497 @default.
• W2888626897 cites W2015851960 @default.
• W2888626897 cites W2046337900 @default.
• W2888626897 cites W2051415037 @default.
• W2888626897 cites W2099706612 @default.
• W2888626897 cites W2107357035 @default.
• W2888626897 cites W2538300762 @default.
• W2888626897 cites W4230172712 @default.
• W2888626897 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.07.006" @default.
• W2888626897 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30145095" @default.
• W2888626897 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2888626897 type Work @default.
• W2888626897 sameAs 2888626897 @default.
• W2888626897 citedByCount "29" @default.
• W2888626897 countsByYear W28886268972019 @default.
• W2888626897 countsByYear W28886268972020 @default.
• W2888626897 countsByYear W28886268972021 @default.
• W2888626897 countsByYear W28886268972022 @default.
• W2888626897 countsByYear W28886268972023 @default.
• W2888626897 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2888626897 hasAuthorship W2888626897A5021014831 @default.
• W2888626897 hasAuthorship W2888626897A5024287701 @default.
• W2888626897 hasAuthorship W2888626897A5048799256 @default.
• W2888626897 hasAuthorship W2888626897A5051402370 @default.
• W2888626897 hasAuthorship W2888626897A5089336383 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConcept C2777786686 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConcept C2779769944 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConceptScore W2888626897C126322002 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConceptScore W2888626897C141071460 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConceptScore W2888626897C167135981 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConceptScore W2888626897C178790620 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConceptScore W2888626897C185592680 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConceptScore W2888626897C2775944032 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConceptScore W2888626897C2777786686 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConceptScore W2888626897C2779769944 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConceptScore W2888626897C2781411149 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConceptScore W2888626897C44249647 @default.
• W2888626897 hasConceptScore W2888626897C71924100 @default.
• W2888626897 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2888626897 hasLocation W28886268971 @default.
• W2888626897 hasLocation W28886268972 @default.
• W2888626897 hasOpenAccess W2888626897 @default.
• W2888626897 hasPrimaryLocation W28886268971 @default.
• W2888626897 hasRelatedWork W1980393270 @default.
• W2888626897 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2888626897 hasRelatedWork W2011233823 @default.
• W2888626897 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2888626897 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2888626897 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2888626897 hasRelatedWork W3024727126 @default.
• W2888626897 hasRelatedWork W3138791732 @default.
• W2888626897 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W2888626897 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2888626897 hasVolume "15" @default.
• W2888626897 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2888626897 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2888626897 magId "2888626897" @default.
• W2888626897 workType "article" @default.