FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2888936698> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2888936698 endingPage "38" @default.
• W2888936698 startingPage "32" @default.
• W2888936698 abstract "The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance and confidence of conventional, optimized, and ultrashort time to echo (UTE) magnetic resonance (MR) protocols for detection of simulated lumbar spondylolysis in human cadavers. In addition, we sought to demonstrate the feasibility of the UTE technique in subjects with and without spondylolysis.Four human lumbar spine specimens with 46 individual pars interarticularis were randomly left intact (n = 26) or received experimental osteotomy (n = 20) using a microsurgical saw to simulate spondylolysis. The specimens were imaged using a computed tomography (CT) scan along with 3 Tiers of MR protocols at 3 T: Tier 1, conventional lumbar MR protocol; Tier 2, optimized conventional protocol consisting of a sagittal oblique spoiled gradient recall echo and axial oblique T1 and short tau inversion recovery sequences; and Tier 3, a sagittal UTE MR sequence. Two blinded readers evaluated the images using a 4-point scale (1 = spondylolysis certainly absent, 2 = probably absent, 3 = probably present, 4 = certainly present) at each individual pars. For each imaging protocol, diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, using the surgical osteotomy as the reference) and confidence were assessed and compared using the McNemar test. Furthermore, 2 human subjects were imaged with the conventional and UTE MR protocols to demonstrate feasibility in vivo.Diagnostic performance was moderate for Tiers 1 and 2, with a moderate sensitivity (0.70 to 0.75) and high (1.00) specificity. In contrast, CT and Tier 3 UTE MR imaging had both high sensitivity (1.00) and specificity (1.00). The sensitivities of CT or Tier 3 were statistically greater than Tier 1 sensitivity (P = 0.041) and neared statistical significance when compared with Tier 2 sensitivity (P = 0.074). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was also significantly greater for CT and Tier 3 (each area = 1.00), compared with the areas for Tier 1 (0.89, P = 0.037) or Tier 2 (0.873, P = 0.024). Diagnostic confidences of CT or Tier 3 were much greater than other Tiers: Both Tiers 1 and 2 had a large percentage of uncertain (>60%, P < 0.001) or wrong interpretations (>10%, P < 0.001), unlike CT or Tier 3 (0% uncertain or wrong interpretations). Preliminary in vivo UTE images clearly depicted intact and fractured pars.Our study demonstrated that the detection of pars fractures using a single sagittal UTE MR sequence is superior in performance and confidence to conventional and optimized MR protocols at 3 T, whereas matching those from CT evaluation. Furthermore, we demonstrated the feasibility of in vivo application of the UTE sequence in subjects with and without spondylolysis." @default.
• W2888936698 created "2018-09-07" @default.
• W2888936698 creator A5000690337 @default.
• W2888936698 creator A5012246721 @default.
• W2888936698 creator A5022128683 @default.
• W2888936698 creator A5039397033 @default.
• W2888936698 creator A5067758672 @default.
• W2888936698 creator A5074139800 @default.
• W2888936698 creator A5075949145 @default.
• W2888936698 creator A5080113762 @default.
• W2888936698 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W2888936698 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2888936698 title "Ultrashort Time-to-Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 T for the Detection of Spondylolysis in Cadaveric Spines" @default.
• W2888936698 cites W1835090478 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W1951747618 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W1966504651 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W1972012651 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W1981180078 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W1982542937 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W1983692078 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2001851779 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2003130167 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2005162964 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2006203080 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2008190514 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2010088323 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2012453923 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2015758012 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2021767987 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2031845727 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2038038602 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2045176044 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2048330954 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2063771475 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2069171575 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2092055232 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2096697328 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2102982627 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2132884759 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2137465928 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2137554305 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2137571255 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2140650202 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2153185631 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2156664953 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2157825442 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2159515364 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2164777277 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2168365274 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2317247184 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2400365025 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2516502969 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2518291781 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2570320735 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2579129208 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2757379895 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W2767390539 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W3021368349 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W4246066421 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W4361867964 @default.
• W2888936698 cites W4376848672 @default.
• W2888936698 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/rli.0000000000000506" @default.
• W2888936698 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6269191" @default.
• W2888936698 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30157099" @default.
• W2888936698 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2888936698 type Work @default.
• W2888936698 sameAs 2888936698 @default.
• W2888936698 citedByCount "24" @default.
• W2888936698 countsByYear W28889366982019 @default.
• W2888936698 countsByYear W28889366982020 @default.
• W2888936698 countsByYear W28889366982021 @default.
• W2888936698 countsByYear W28889366982022 @default.
• W2888936698 countsByYear W28889366982023 @default.
• W2888936698 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2888936698 hasAuthorship W2888936698A5000690337 @default.
• W2888936698 hasAuthorship W2888936698A5012246721 @default.
• W2888936698 hasAuthorship W2888936698A5022128683 @default.
• W2888936698 hasAuthorship W2888936698A5039397033 @default.
• W2888936698 hasAuthorship W2888936698A5067758672 @default.
• W2888936698 hasAuthorship W2888936698A5074139800 @default.
• W2888936698 hasAuthorship W2888936698A5075949145 @default.
• W2888936698 hasAuthorship W2888936698A5080113762 @default.
• W2888936698 hasBestOaLocation W28889366982 @default.
• W2888936698 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2888936698 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2888936698 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2888936698 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W2888936698 hasConcept C175696284 @default.
• W2888936698 hasConcept C178910020 @default.
• W2888936698 hasConcept C186282968 @default.
• W2888936698 hasConcept C2776623965 @default.
• W2888936698 hasConcept C2780212340 @default.
• W2888936698 hasConcept C2780307688 @default.
• W2888936698 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2888936698 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2888936698 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2888936698 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2888936698 hasConceptScore W2888936698C105702510 @default.

• next