FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2889748094> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2889748094 abstract "Co-producing research with members of the public is increasingly recognised as a valuable process. Yet, despite these good intentions, the literature on coproduction has struggled to keep pace with the coproduction 'movement'. There is a lack of clarity regarding acceptable levels of involvement and attempts at standardising approaches appear generic and lack detail. Moreover, relatively little research has captured the views of all the parties involved (academics, service providers and service users).We conducted interviews with all those involved in developing a new online service for depression in Northern Ireland. Our main questions related to how these three very different groups of people worked together over a two-year period to design, develop and deliver the service (e.g. what were the benefits? What would they do differently?)We found that early involvement was a key factor as this promoted equal ownership. There was also a need to be flexible and recognise other workload pressures. Interestingly, service providers and service users were keen to become more involved in data analysis - this is one of the most under-researched and reported areas within the coproduction literature. Finally, we considered how user involvement worked within complex research designs and how this could be improved. Based on this learning, the paper concludes with a simple 3-step framework that others may wish to follow in order to improve coproduction outcomes within interventions.Background Co-production, involving members of the public in research, is increasingly encouraged by research funders. However, reports detailing involvement of the public in the entire research process from design, delivery, analysis and dissemination of findings are lacking. Furthermore, little is known about the lessons learnt from the perspective of the public and researchers; or more specifically lessons learnt when coproducing specific types of research projects, such as feasibility/pilot studies incorporating a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design. This paper aims to provide a more rounded picture of co-production based on the learning outcomes of researchers, their community partners and service users involved in a feasibility/pilot RCT study developing and evaluating an E-health Service for adults with depression. Methods Qualitative research incorporating 11 semi-structured interviews with academic team members (n = 4), community partners (n = 3) and service users with depression (n = 4) Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Key factors for successful coproduction include - (1) early involvement at the pre-development stage, including contributing to the scientific grant application; (2) early identification of team strengths and expertise from the outset; (3) regular team meetings and contact (formal or informal) among coproduction partners; (4) a flexible and pragmatic approach to research design (particularly within RCTs); (5) shared decision making and responsibility and (6) recognition of 'other' pressures and providing support to each other. Findings also suggested further scope for involving community partners in data analysis and dissemination through co-authored papers. Those seeking to coproduce interventions or utilise RCT designs should consider tensions between data quality and intervention implementation and ethical issues regarding control groups. Conclusion This paper confirms previous research confirming the benefits of coproduction. However, it also highlights a number of barriers, particularly when using complex research design, such as RCTs. Learning points are summarised in an implementation model for coproducing research. This model may provide a useful guide for considering activities associated with meaningful coproduction. We urge others to test this proposed model more widely in different areas of coproduced research." @default.
• W2889748094 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2889748094 creator A5010981674 @default.
• W2889748094 creator A5044038308 @default.
• W2889748094 creator A5048368182 @default.
• W2889748094 creator A5063525763 @default.
• W2889748094 creator A5069286845 @default.
• W2889748094 creator A5081799758 @default.
• W2889748094 date "2018-10-08" @default.
• W2889748094 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2889748094 title "Coproduction for feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trials: learning outcomes for community partners, service users and the research team" @default.
• W2889748094 cites W1502678715 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W1589185784 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W1635118023 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W1862337869 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W1919646544 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W1934001385 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W1940084825 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W1996760592 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2012837714 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2028994146 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2049504028 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2058890938 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2072287655 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2094067116 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2100889218 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2100905299 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2112361650 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2112728637 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2121486261 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2128659393 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2130268361 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2136901195 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2140960626 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2152542401 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2164626230 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2169877598 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2170722669 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2185174649 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2223676568 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2276793051 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2582684191 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2610057828 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2754075663 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W2765870229 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W3198653019 @default.
• W2889748094 cites W4255850435 @default.
• W2889748094 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-018-0116-0" @default.
• W2889748094 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6174568" @default.
• W2889748094 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30338129" @default.
• W2889748094 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2889748094 type Work @default.
• W2889748094 sameAs 2889748094 @default.
• W2889748094 citedByCount "33" @default.
• W2889748094 countsByYear W28897480942019 @default.
• W2889748094 countsByYear W28897480942020 @default.
• W2889748094 countsByYear W28897480942021 @default.
• W2889748094 countsByYear W28897480942022 @default.
• W2889748094 countsByYear W28897480942023 @default.
• W2889748094 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2889748094 hasAuthorship W2889748094A5010981674 @default.
• W2889748094 hasAuthorship W2889748094A5044038308 @default.
• W2889748094 hasAuthorship W2889748094A5048368182 @default.
• W2889748094 hasAuthorship W2889748094A5063525763 @default.
• W2889748094 hasAuthorship W2889748094A5069286845 @default.
• W2889748094 hasAuthorship W2889748094A5081799758 @default.
• W2889748094 hasBestOaLocation W28897480941 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C116537 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C13280743 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C2777146004 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C2777526511 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C2778746772 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C2780378061 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConceptScore W2889748094C108827166 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConceptScore W2889748094C116537 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConceptScore W2889748094C13280743 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConceptScore W2889748094C144024400 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConceptScore W2889748094C144133560 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConceptScore W2889748094C159110408 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConceptScore W2889748094C162853370 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConceptScore W2889748094C17744445 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConceptScore W2889748094C185592680 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConceptScore W2889748094C190248442 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConceptScore W2889748094C205649164 @default.
• W2889748094 hasConceptScore W2889748094C27415008 @default.

• next