FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2889749611> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2889749611 abstract "Service-learning (SL) has been widely implemented and grown as a pedagogy in the rehabilitation professions. However, assessment on the quality of evidence for the effectiveness of SL related to student learning outcomes and the scope of SL activities related to the occupation of work in the rehabilitation professions is not available.This systematic review was to evaluate the rigor of the methodological quality of SL studies and the scope of SL activities related to the occupation of work in the rehabilitation professions.We performed a systematic on-line electronic literature search of nine bibliographic databases available through the university library system to identify peer-reviewed journal articles on SL provided by the tri-alliance of rehabilitation professional students, with the primary or secondary outcome on the evaluation of student SL experiences. Twenty-two SL articles using experimental design between 1995 and 2016 were extracted as they qualified for the methodological appraisal. Appraisal of each article was performed independently by four investigators using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies.In six of the 22 SL studies (27%), service provided by the rehabilitation professional students was related to the occupation of work (i.e., assessment, prevention of illness, injury, and disability, and intervention). There was a significant increase in the number (and percent) of SL studies related to the occupation of work compared to that of a previous systematic review (0%, P = 0.03, Fisher's exact test). Results from the evaluation of the methodological quality of these 22 reviewed articles revealed that all received a global rating score of weak. The low methodological quality rating of the reviewed articles was mainly attributed to not controlling for confounders (22 articles), non-blinding (21), and using outcome measures which did not have evidence to support their validity (14). Inability to control for confounders was related to weak research design as more than 77% of the reviewed articles used quasi-experimental designs without a control group. Non-blinding was related to the self-report nature of the outcome measures.A significant increase in the number of SL studies related to the occupation of work was found, which may provide an indirect indication on an increase in the capacity to provide (work) rehabilitation services. However, selected studies demonstrated high risk of bias which limited firm conclusions to be drawn on reported findings from SL in the tri-alliance of rehabilitation professions curricula." @default.
• W2889749611 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2889749611 creator A5018499178 @default.
• W2889749611 creator A5057601634 @default.
• W2889749611 creator A5067301994 @default.
• W2889749611 creator A5090596795 @default.
• W2889749611 date "2018-10-09" @default.
• W2889749611 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2889749611 title "Methodological quality of service learning studies in rehabilitation professions: A systematic review" @default.
• W2889749611 cites W112221918 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W172964945 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W177685665 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W1993905377 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W1996379552 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2007233978 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2017358996 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2037872682 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2040666195 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2043752344 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2045224074 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2045535617 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2047030182 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2049327476 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2050815513 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2052061741 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2054198454 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2091230577 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2118376482 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2124633438 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2128966286 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2130819503 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2147117340 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2162163297 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2166754098 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2179694403 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2208053283 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2313213161 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2330680404 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2395747781 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2534096346 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2563410275 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W2607200906 @default.
• W2889749611 cites W319989719 @default.
• W2889749611 doi "https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-182779" @default.
• W2889749611 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30223412" @default.
• W2889749611 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2889749611 type Work @default.
• W2889749611 sameAs 2889749611 @default.
• W2889749611 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2889749611 countsByYear W28897496112019 @default.
• W2889749611 countsByYear W28897496112022 @default.
• W2889749611 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2889749611 hasAuthorship W2889749611A5018499178 @default.
• W2889749611 hasAuthorship W2889749611A5057601634 @default.
• W2889749611 hasAuthorship W2889749611A5067301994 @default.
• W2889749611 hasAuthorship W2889749611A5090596795 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C152541439 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C2778012447 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C111472728 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C138885662 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C142724271 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C152541439 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C15744967 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C159110408 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C17744445 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C1862650 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C189708586 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C199360897 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C199539241 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C204787440 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C2778012447 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C2778818304 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C2779473830 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C2779530757 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C2780665704 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C41008148 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C509550671 @default.
• W2889749611 hasConceptScore W2889749611C71924100 @default.
• W2889749611 hasLocation W28897496111 @default.
• W2889749611 hasLocation W28897496112 @default.
• W2889749611 hasOpenAccess W2889749611 @default.
• W2889749611 hasPrimaryLocation W28897496111 @default.

• next