FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2890116714> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2890116714 endingPage "103" @default.
• W2890116714 startingPage "103" @default.
• W2890116714 abstract "<i>Background:</i> Most of the people in Bangladesh due to their hectic lifestyles are now increasingly dependent on various bakery products as a source of ready-to-eat foods. Generally, majority of these widely consumed bakery products mainly bread and cakes are supplied by local bakeries. Any chance of unwanted microbial contamination of these popular food products due to any poor manufacturing, handling and packaging practices can lead to major food safety and public health problems. <i>Objectives:</i> This study was aimed to determine and compare the microbiological quality of the locally produced bakery products of Jessore based bakeries with those of branded bakery products produced by renowned food bakeries as well as assessing their relative packaging conditions in respective shops. <i>Method:</i> 120 bakery shops were randomly selected in Jessore region for a questionnaire based data collection. Three types of bakery shops; tea stalls, confectionaries, and variety stores were inspected against their vending extent of branded and local bakery products with associated packaging and visual appearance. Later, 20 samples of cakes (n=10) and breads (n=10) were tested to determine the total fungal count (TFC), total bacterial count (TBC), total <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (TSA), total Enterobacteriaceae (TE), and total coliforms count (TC) in cfu/g. For required statistical data analysis Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS)-16 software was used. <i>Results:</i> Most of the open (44.6%) and spoiled (49.4%) bakery products were found in the Tea stalls. Locally produced bakery products had greater percentage of spoiled bread and cakes compared to their branded counterparts. Breads were more visually spoiled than cakes irrespective of their brands. The number of visually spoiled breads and cakes positively and significantly increased with the number of opened or partially sealed breads and cakes (r=0.64, p<0.01). Microbial counts (cfu/g) in local products were always higher than that of their branded counterparts. Bacterial counts (cfu/g) in branded products were always lower than local counterparts (Bread, 12.8 ×10⁷ ± 3.63×10⁷ vs 37.8×10⁷ ± 19.1×10⁷, p=0.024 and Cake, 10.2×10⁷ ± 3.20×10⁷ vs 30.8×10⁷ ± 21.7×10⁷, p=0.003). Coliform count in unpacked sample (4.7×10⁴ cfu/g) was observed much higher than the safety limit for human consumption. Bread and cake produced by local bakeries showed lower standard in packaging and microbial quality. A better manufacturing and packaging initiatives can be introduced to avoid its related food safety concerns in future." @default.
• W2890116714 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2890116714 creator A5011169336 @default.
• W2890116714 creator A5020558663 @default.
• W2890116714 creator A5028374110 @default.
• W2890116714 creator A5029043620 @default.
• W2890116714 creator A5044164538 @default.
• W2890116714 creator A5091022941 @default.
• W2890116714 date "2018-01-01" @default.
• W2890116714 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2890116714 title "Packaging and Microbial Status of Local & Branded Bakery Products: A Comparative Study on Jessore Region, Bangladesh" @default.
• W2890116714 doi "https://doi.org/10.11648/j.fem.20180404.12" @default.
• W2890116714 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2890116714 type Work @default.
• W2890116714 sameAs 2890116714 @default.
• W2890116714 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2890116714 countsByYear W28901167142023 @default.
• W2890116714 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2890116714 hasAuthorship W2890116714A5011169336 @default.
• W2890116714 hasAuthorship W2890116714A5020558663 @default.
• W2890116714 hasAuthorship W2890116714A5028374110 @default.
• W2890116714 hasAuthorship W2890116714A5029043620 @default.
• W2890116714 hasAuthorship W2890116714A5044164538 @default.
• W2890116714 hasAuthorship W2890116714A5091022941 @default.
• W2890116714 hasBestOaLocation W28901167141 @default.
• W2890116714 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2890116714 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2890116714 hasConcept C2986587452 @default.
• W2890116714 hasConcept C2987718291 @default.
• W2890116714 hasConcept C31903555 @default.
• W2890116714 hasConcept C33070731 @default.
• W2890116714 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2890116714 hasConcept C74139830 @default.
• W2890116714 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2890116714 hasConceptScore W2890116714C105795698 @default.
• W2890116714 hasConceptScore W2890116714C144133560 @default.
• W2890116714 hasConceptScore W2890116714C2986587452 @default.
• W2890116714 hasConceptScore W2890116714C2987718291 @default.
• W2890116714 hasConceptScore W2890116714C31903555 @default.
• W2890116714 hasConceptScore W2890116714C33070731 @default.
• W2890116714 hasConceptScore W2890116714C33923547 @default.
• W2890116714 hasConceptScore W2890116714C74139830 @default.
• W2890116714 hasConceptScore W2890116714C86803240 @default.
• W2890116714 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2890116714 hasLocation W28901167141 @default.
• W2890116714 hasOpenAccess W2890116714 @default.
• W2890116714 hasPrimaryLocation W28901167141 @default.
• W2890116714 hasRelatedWork W1522955152 @default.
• W2890116714 hasRelatedWork W2049566587 @default.
• W2890116714 hasRelatedWork W2060721031 @default.
• W2890116714 hasRelatedWork W2467988512 @default.
• W2890116714 hasRelatedWork W2955460402 @default.
• W2890116714 hasRelatedWork W3011917871 @default.
• W2890116714 hasRelatedWork W3042567637 @default.
• W2890116714 hasRelatedWork W3112214126 @default.
• W2890116714 hasRelatedWork W3176560993 @default.
• W2890116714 hasRelatedWork W4226336650 @default.
• W2890116714 hasVolume "4" @default.
• W2890116714 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2890116714 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2890116714 magId "2890116714" @default.
• W2890116714 workType "article" @default.