FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2890139941> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2890139941 endingPage "2935" @default.
• W2890139941 startingPage "2927" @default.
• W2890139941 abstract "Purpose To compare the risk of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure in patients who undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with either autograft tissue or hybrid grafts. Methods A systematic search was performed on February 28, 2018, on PubMed, Scopus, Arthroscopy, and Cochrane Library. Included studies were clinical outcome studies of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions that compared failure risk for hybrid grafts versus autografts. Baseline and outcomes data were extracted, and reporting quality was assessed via modified Coleman criteria. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted for both randomized and nonrandomized studies. Results Nine studies were identified with a mean of 40.1 months of follow-up. The mean Coleman methodology score was 66.5 (standard deviation, 12.8). One randomized study (Level II evidence) was identified with no difference in failure rates (0% for both groups, 8-mm minimum graft diameter for all patients). Eight nonrandomized studies (all Level III evidence) were identified with no difference in failure risk for hybrid grafts versus autograft (pooled odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-2.92; P = .55; I2 = 34%). Mean graft diameters were significantly larger in hybrid groups (range, 8.5-9.9 mm) than in autograft groups (range, 6.4-8.8 mm) in nonrandomized studies (mean difference, 0.5-2.5 mm; P ≤ .003). There was no evidence of small study bias or bias owing to reporting quality, and adjustment for length of follow-up, mean patient age, percentage of male patients, year of publication, or reporting quality did not improve statistical heterogeneity. Conclusions Based on the current literature, although it may be theoretically detrimental to add allograft to a small-diameter autograft, it cannot be definitively shown based on the findings of this review with meta-analysis. Currently, it remains unclear that there is an advantage or disadvantage to hybridization of small autograft with allograft, although randomized studies of patients with small (<8-mm) autograft diameters are lacking. Level of Evidence Level III, systematic review of Level II and III studies. To compare the risk of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure in patients who undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with either autograft tissue or hybrid grafts. A systematic search was performed on February 28, 2018, on PubMed, Scopus, Arthroscopy, and Cochrane Library. Included studies were clinical outcome studies of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions that compared failure risk for hybrid grafts versus autografts. Baseline and outcomes data were extracted, and reporting quality was assessed via modified Coleman criteria. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted for both randomized and nonrandomized studies. Nine studies were identified with a mean of 40.1 months of follow-up. The mean Coleman methodology score was 66.5 (standard deviation, 12.8). One randomized study (Level II evidence) was identified with no difference in failure rates (0% for both groups, 8-mm minimum graft diameter for all patients). Eight nonrandomized studies (all Level III evidence) were identified with no difference in failure risk for hybrid grafts versus autograft (pooled odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-2.92; P = .55; I2 = 34%). Mean graft diameters were significantly larger in hybrid groups (range, 8.5-9.9 mm) than in autograft groups (range, 6.4-8.8 mm) in nonrandomized studies (mean difference, 0.5-2.5 mm; P ≤ .003). There was no evidence of small study bias or bias owing to reporting quality, and adjustment for length of follow-up, mean patient age, percentage of male patients, year of publication, or reporting quality did not improve statistical heterogeneity. Based on the current literature, although it may be theoretically detrimental to add allograft to a small-diameter autograft, it cannot be definitively shown based on the findings of this review with meta-analysis. Currently, it remains unclear that there is an advantage or disadvantage to hybridization of small autograft with allograft, although randomized studies of patients with small (<8-mm) autograft diameters are lacking." @default.
• W2890139941 created "2018-09-27" @default.
• W2890139941 creator A5014935252 @default.
• W2890139941 creator A5020528316 @default.
• W2890139941 creator A5025455351 @default.
• W2890139941 creator A5082512348 @default.
• W2890139941 creator A5090368197 @default.
• W2890139941 date "2018-10-01" @default.
• W2890139941 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2890139941 title "Risk of Retear Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Hybrid Graft of Autograft Augmented With Allograft Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis" @default.
• W2890139941 cites W1815960126 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W1976272093 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W1978303393 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W1984963219 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W1996478032 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W1997758813 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2005725515 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2020835499 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2027313695 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2030871510 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2039235017 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2061397539 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2078914121 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2079424409 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2097535587 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2100305113 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2125983406 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2141621619 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2152990182 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2153334341 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2163295045 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2310514123 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2326926472 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2335626163 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2414954774 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2478573188 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2485195034 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2491473983 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2565091465 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2596072424 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2599077470 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2740227964 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2768138640 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W2776891898 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W4247733623 @default.
• W2890139941 cites W4294215472 @default.
• W2890139941 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.06.044" @default.
• W2890139941 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30195958" @default.
• W2890139941 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2890139941 type Work @default.
• W2890139941 sameAs 2890139941 @default.
• W2890139941 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W2890139941 countsByYear W28901399412018 @default.
• W2890139941 countsByYear W28901399412019 @default.
• W2890139941 countsByYear W28901399412020 @default.
• W2890139941 countsByYear W28901399412021 @default.
• W2890139941 countsByYear W28901399412023 @default.
• W2890139941 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2890139941 hasAuthorship W2890139941A5014935252 @default.
• W2890139941 hasAuthorship W2890139941A5020528316 @default.
• W2890139941 hasAuthorship W2890139941A5025455351 @default.
• W2890139941 hasAuthorship W2890139941A5082512348 @default.
• W2890139941 hasAuthorship W2890139941A5090368197 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConcept C2778434673 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConcept C2780887989 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConcept C28804328 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConceptScore W2890139941C126322002 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConceptScore W2890139941C141071460 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConceptScore W2890139941C156957248 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConceptScore W2890139941C168563851 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConceptScore W2890139941C2776478404 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConceptScore W2890139941C2778434673 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConceptScore W2890139941C2779162959 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConceptScore W2890139941C2780887989 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConceptScore W2890139941C28804328 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConceptScore W2890139941C44249647 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConceptScore W2890139941C71924100 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConceptScore W2890139941C82789193 @default.
• W2890139941 hasConceptScore W2890139941C95190672 @default.
• W2890139941 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2890139941 hasLocation W28901399411 @default.
• W2890139941 hasLocation W28901399412 @default.
• W2890139941 hasOpenAccess W2890139941 @default.
• W2890139941 hasPrimaryLocation W28901399411 @default.
• W2890139941 hasRelatedWork W1487791876 @default.
• W2890139941 hasRelatedWork W2217553306 @default.
• W2890139941 hasRelatedWork W2343507876 @default.
• W2890139941 hasRelatedWork W2762279224 @default.

• next