Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2890198114> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 66 of
66
with 100 items per page.
- W2890198114 abstract "The research carried out allowed to look at social assessment of both already implemented statutory quotas and the proposed gender parity on electoral lists. The findings of the research showed that over half of the surveyed left-wing political party-in-the-electorate acknowledged the implementation of statutory quotas as reasonable and the proposal of introducing gender parity on the electoral lists as worth-implementing (Palikot's Movement - 42.2% and Democratic Left Alliance - 37.9%). Among the Civic Platform and Polish People's Party adherents a substantial percentage are the adherents of quotas rather than gender parity (Civic Platform - 44.1% and 38.9% respectively, Polish People's Party - 48.7% i 34.2% respectively) but there are substantially fewer adversaries of this solution. At the same time among the adversaries of Law and Justice only 35.6% acknowledge the solution implemented as reasonable whereas only 35.5% consider the proposal for introducing gender parity as worth-implementing. Nevertheless the percentage of adversaries of such solutions is even smaller - in the case of quotas it is 28.1% and in the case of gender parity - 35.1%. The rest of the Law and Justice adversaries do not have an opinion on this issue. The division into adherents and adversaries of the decision about implementing statutory quotas or proposals for gender parity with reference to ideological views is even clearer. Among the respondents expressing their views as left- wing more than half of them acknowledge the implementation of quotas as reasonable (51%) and 38.5% consider the propo- sals for gender parity as worth- implementing. 48% of the persons sympathising with the centre were in favour of quotas, while 34% were for gender parity. On the other hand among the respondents defining their views as right-wing only 31.8% acknowledged the implementation of statutory quotas as reasonable whereas 29.8% considered the proposal for gender parity as worth-implementing. It is worth-emphasising that irrespective of political sympathies the respondents assess the implemented statutory quotas much favourably than the proposal for implementing gender parity on electoral lists." @default.
- W2890198114 created "2018-09-27" @default.
- W2890198114 creator A5017193219 @default.
- W2890198114 date "2013-07-01" @default.
- W2890198114 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W2890198114 title "The Attitude of the Electorate to Statutory Solutions Giving Equal Opportunity to Men and Women in Filling the Positions on Electoral Lists" @default.
- W2890198114 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2890198114 type Work @default.
- W2890198114 sameAs 2890198114 @default.
- W2890198114 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2890198114 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2890198114 hasAuthorship W2890198114A5017193219 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConcept C109214941 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConcept C158071213 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConcept C158129432 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConcept C2777151079 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConcept C2778431023 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConcept C3018429975 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConcept C555826173 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConceptScore W2890198114C109214941 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConceptScore W2890198114C121332964 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConceptScore W2890198114C144024400 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConceptScore W2890198114C158071213 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConceptScore W2890198114C158129432 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConceptScore W2890198114C17744445 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConceptScore W2890198114C190253527 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConceptScore W2890198114C199539241 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConceptScore W2890198114C2777151079 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConceptScore W2890198114C2778431023 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConceptScore W2890198114C3018429975 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConceptScore W2890198114C555826173 @default.
- W2890198114 hasConceptScore W2890198114C94625758 @default.
- W2890198114 hasIssue "6" @default.
- W2890198114 hasLocation W28901981141 @default.
- W2890198114 hasOpenAccess W2890198114 @default.
- W2890198114 hasPrimaryLocation W28901981141 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W124803419 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W134648339 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W2004315364 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W2009796197 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W2094610925 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W2128824074 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W2135858061 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W2166543563 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W2255875945 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W2258766195 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W2260706163 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W2339610283 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W2735880883 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W2754524228 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W3119241455 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W3137969768 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W583828823 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W639001228 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W2186926187 @default.
- W2890198114 hasRelatedWork W2188694754 @default.
- W2890198114 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2890198114 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2890198114 magId "2890198114" @default.
- W2890198114 workType "article" @default.